Migliozzi, Simona

Abstract Current transcriptomic classification of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) has been ineffective to predict survival and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Recently, we proposed a four-group functional classification of GBM that included proliferative/progenitor, neuronal, mitochondrial and glycolytic/plurimetabolic subtypes with prognostic and therapeutic implications as the mitochondrial subtype carries the best survival and exhibits distinct sensitivity to mitochondrial OXPHOS inhibitors. To uncover novel therapeutic targets for each functional GBM subtype, we focused on protein kinases for their attractive features as both drivers and drug targets, with current availability of 62 FDA-approved inhibitors available for cancer precision therapeutics. We designed an unbiased integrative, machine learning-based proteomics/phosphoproteomics network for the identification of Master Kinases (MKs) responsible for effecting key phenotypic hallmarks of each of the four GBM subtypes. Here we report the identification and validation of protein kinase C delta (PRKCd) and DNA-PKcs as MKs that sustain the glycolytic/plurimetabolic and proliferative/progenitor GBM subtypes, respectively. Genetic and pharmacologic inactivation of PKCd in GBM patient-derived organoids of the glycolytic/plurimetabolic subtype blocked glucose uptake and lipid accumulation, resulting in marked anti-tumor effects. We also validated the role of PKCd in oncometabolic processes at the intersection between insulin, IGF, and lipid metabolism. DNA-PKcs was qualified as MK for the proliferative/progenitor GBM subtype, which is characterized by high basal level of replication stress. Biochemical experiments showed activation of DNA-PK in GBM patient-derived organoids of the proliferative/progenitor subgroup. Targeting DNA-PK in proliferative/progenitor GBM organoids with the clinically tested DNA-PKcs inhibitor nedisertib in association with gamma irradiation, the essential component of the standard of care for patients with GBM, led to an unsustainable level of DNA damage and massive GBM cell death selectively in this GBM subtype. As DNA-PKcs inhibitors have been introduced into clinical trials, our findings suggest that pre-selection of patient with PPR tumors is likely to enhance therapeutic success.

Abstract Tumor heterogeneity and broad therapeutic resistance are major challenges when treating patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Moreover, different from other cancer types, the absence of clinically useful classifiers for glioblastoma has hampered the translation of genomic and proteomic information to improve diagnosis and design precision therapeutics for patients. We analyzed a large dataset of human GBM to determine the multi-omics features characterizing the four GBM subtypes that we have recently identified through single-cell RNA sequencing and validated in bulk tumor analysis. Each subtype exhibits activation of unique functional traits that confer distinct therapeutic vulnerabilities. The examination of proteomics, phosphoproteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics and acetylomics data revealed that each GBM subtype has a coherent molecular structure driving the dominant function traceable in each analytical platform. Functional classes are not a specific attribute of GBM as we identified the same subtypes in breast and lung cancer. To test the translational impact of proteomic data in GBM, we developed an unbiased protein kinase signaling network approach for the selection of master kinases (MKs) aberrantly activated in each GBM subtype. We identified therapeutically actionable MKs and novel phosphorylation substrates that we experimentally validated. To provide rapid translation of the functional classifier for precision medicine in GBM, we developed a probabilistic classification tool which determines the probability that a patient’s GBM belongs to one of the four subtypes, exhibiting optimal performance when using RNA extracted from either frozen and paraffin-embedded tissues. The algorithm is publicly accessible and can be used to evaluate the association of therapeutic response with GBM subtypes and as tool for selection criteria in prospective clinical trials.