Jiménez, Rafael E.

5053 Background: Genomic aberrations associated with resistance/response to AA/P are not known. In a prospective study we assessed whole-exome/RNA-seq based aberrations in CRPC metastatic biopsies for identifying molecular markers associated with primary resistance and response duration. Methods: Sequencing of metastatic biopsies was performed for analyzing molecular aberrations that predict primary resistance (defined as progression at 12-weeks of therapy (non-responders) using PSA, RECIST, bone scan criteria per PCWG2). Gene network analysis was performed in genes mutated more frequently in non-responders and in genes differentially expressed between non-responders and responders using a “risk ratio” (RR) of ≥2. Cox regression models with multiple gene network pathways were used for determining association with time to treatment change (TTTC). Results: Of 92 enrolled pts 82 had complete whole-exome, RNA-seq & 12-week outcome data available for analysis. At 12-weeks 33/82 had progressed. Using a RR of ≥2, 113 genes were more frequently mutated in non-responders & 292 in responders. In non-responders, gene network analysis revealed frequent mutations in Wnt/β-catenin pathway genes; frequent deletion of negative regulators of Wnt pathway ( DKK4, SFRP2, LRP6). Gene expression analyses revealed significantly reduced expression levels of Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitors and increased expression levels of cell cycle proliferation (CCP) genes in non-responders. Median study follow up was 32 months during which time 58/82 pts progressed and switched treatments. Median TTTC was 10.1 months (IQR:4.4-24.1). In multivariate analysis CCP scores of ≥50 predicted shorter TTTC (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.17-3.80; p = 0.01). Conclusions: In metastases Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation is associated with primary AA/P resistance and increased CCP with acquired drug resistance. These findings offer molecular based predictive biomarkers in CRPC stage treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT#01953640.

Abstract Purpose: Deletions or mutations in PTEN and TP53 tumor suppressor genes have been linked to lineage plasticity in therapy-resistant prostate cancer. Fusion-driven overexpression of the oncogenic transcription factor ERG is observed in approximately 50% of all prostate cancers, many of which also harbor PTEN and TP53 alterations. However, the role of ERG in lineage plasticity of PTEN/TP53–altered tumors is unclear. Understanding the collective effect of multiple mutations within one tumor is essential to combat plasticity-driven therapy resistance. Experimental Design: We generated a Pten-negative/Trp53-mutated/ERG-overexpressing mouse model of prostate cancer and integrated RNA-sequencing with ERG chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) to identify pathways regulated by ERG in the context of Pten/Trp53 alteration. We investigated ERG-dependent sensitivity to the antiandrogen enzalutamide and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor palbociclib in human prostate cancer cell lines, xenografts, and allografted mouse tumors. Trends were evaluated in TCGA, SU2C, and Beltran 2016 published patient cohorts and a human tissue microarray. Results: Transgenic ERG expression in mice blocked Pten/Trp53 alteration–induced decrease of AR expression and downstream luminal epithelial genes. ERG directly suppressed expression of cell cycle–related genes, which induced RB hypophosphorylation and repressed E2F1-mediated expression of mesenchymal lineage regulators, thereby restricting adenocarcinoma plasticity and maintaining antiandrogen sensitivity. In ERG-negative tumors, CDK4/6 inhibition delayed tumor growth. Conclusions: Our studies identify a previously undefined function of ERG to restrict lineage plasticity and maintain antiandrogen sensitivity in PTEN/TP53–altered prostate cancer. Our findings suggest ERG fusion as a biomarker to guide treatment of PTEN/TP53-altered, RB1-intact prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4551–65. ©2018 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Androgen receptor (AR) variant AR-V7 is a ligand-independent transcription factor that promotes prostate cancer resistance to AR-targeted therapies. Accordingly, efforts are under way to develop strategies for monitoring and inhibiting AR-V7 in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The purpose of this study was to understand whether other AR variants may be coexpressed with AR-V7 and promote resistance to AR-targeted therapies. Experimental Design: We utilized complementary short- and long-read sequencing of intact AR mRNA isoforms to characterize AR expression in CRPC models. Coexpression of AR-V7 and AR-V9 mRNA in CRPC metastases and circulating tumor cells was assessed by RNA-seq and RT-PCR, respectively. Expression of AR-V9 protein in CRPC models was evaluated with polyclonal antisera. Multivariate analysis was performed to test whether AR variant mRNA expression in metastatic tissues was associated with a 12-week progression-free survival endpoint in a prospective clinical trial of 78 CRPC-stage patients initiating therapy with the androgen synthesis inhibitor, abiraterone acetate. Results: AR-V9 was frequently coexpressed with AR-V7. Both AR variant species were found to share a common 3′ terminal cryptic exon, which rendered AR-V9 susceptible to experimental manipulations that were previously thought to target AR-V7 uniquely. AR-V9 promoted ligand-independent growth of prostate cancer cells. High AR-V9 mRNA expression in CRPC metastases was predictive of primary resistance to abiraterone acetate (HR = 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.31–12.2; P = 0.02). Conclusions: AR-V9 may be an important component of therapeutic resistance in CRPC. Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4704–15. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a deadly disease with a poor prognosis. Treatment options for CRPC patients involve taxanes or newly developed drugs targeting the androgen pathway or androgen synthesis, including CYP17 inhibitors. However, response to therapy varies dramatically among patients, which might be due, in part, to tumor heterogeneity. Therefore, understanding of the genomic landscape of CRPC would be important to help achieve better outcomes by developing personalized therapies. One challenge contributing to our lack of therapies for CRPC is a paucity of clinically relevant animal models predictive of response to therapy in human patients. The Prostate Cancer Medically Optimized Genome Enhanced Therapy (PROMOTE) study is a Mayo Clinic prospective trial designed for patients with metastatic CRPC who are treated with abiraterone acetate, a CYP17 inhibitor, over a 12 week period. Fresh tissue from metastatic lesions, primarily bone metastases, was obtained by needle core biopsy before and 12 weeks after initiating abiraterone acetate treatment. The samples were submitted for DNA and RNA sequencing and were also used to generate patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. PDX models were developed by injecting biopsy samples subcutaneously or under the renal capsule in male non-obese diabetic (NOD)/severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) or NOD/SCID/IL-2γ-receptor null (NSG) mice implanted with 25mg testosterone pellets at the time of tissue implantation and 2 months later. Baseline samples from 103 unique patients as well as second samples from 61 patients post abiraterone acetate treatment were injected into approximately 600 mice. Of the samples for which pathology is currently available, 31% of the biopsies injected into mice were confirmed to include tumor tissue, which may be compared with a figure of 37.5% of samples sent for sequencing. Thus far, we have established 8 PDX models, four from baseline and four from post treatment samples. Seven models were derived from metastatic bone lesions, and one model from a liver metastasis. The tumor tissue in each model was expanded into a second of generation of mice and harvested when the tumors grew. No tumor was expanded more than four times. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of xenograft tissue from different “generations” of xenograft expansion is ongoing and will be compared with similar data for the original biopsy. The evaluation of treatment response after exposure of these PDX models to different therapies including CYP19 inhibitors, AR blockers and taxanes is ongoing. These PDX models provide a tool for future drug testing and for studying mechanisms of resistance to therapy in CRPC. Citation Format: Fang Xie, Manish Kohli, Yin Ping, Rafael E. Jimenez, Richard M. Weinshilboum, Liewei Wang. Developing patient derived xenograft (PDX) models for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) during CYP17 inhibitor therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr A05.

86 Background: Phyllodes tumors (PT) are rare breast neoplasms confounding their systematic study and evidence-based management guidelines. There is little data on the sensitivity of preoperative core needle biopsy (CNB) and imaging findings in establishing a correct preoperative diagnosis. We undertook this study to evaluate the sensitivity of CNB histologic findings and imaging findings in preoperatively categorizing tumors as benign or borderline/malignant. Methods: We identified 47 patients who underwent surgical resection of a PT at our institution after a preoperative CNB between 6/2000-3/2012. Statistical analysis utilized Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. Results: 30 patients had a final diagnosis of benign and 17 of borderline/malignant PT. The latter were significantly more often palpable (76.5% vs 36.7%, p=0.01). No other clinical or radiologic feature predicted borderline/malignant subtype, although irregular shape on US was suggestive (70.6% vs 44.8%, p= 0.09). CNB diagnosis by tumor type is summarized in the table. No benign PT had ≥10 mitoses, necrosis or marked stromal atypia on CNB. No case with absent mitoses on preoperative CNB was a borderline/malignant PT; however 77% of benign PT did exhibit mitoses on CNB. Sensitivity of CNB for PT overall was 48.9% (95% CI: 35.3-62.8%) while it was 40% (24.6-57.7%) for benign PT and 17.6% (6.2-41.0%) for borderline/malignant PT. Conclusions: Marked stromal atypia, ≥10 mitoses and necrosis were rare on CNB, but suggestive of malignancy. No imaging or histology feature reliably distinguished between tumor types. Over one-third of borderline/malignant PT had a preoperative CNB diagnosis of fibroadenoma or cellular fibroepithelial lesion emphasizing the low sensitivity of CNB and the need for judicious consideration of definitive surgical excision. [Table: see text]

249 Background: Evaluating tumor specific pathologic and genetic profiles in mCRPC stage is difficult due to the limited availability of mCRPC tissue. We describe findings from a prospective cohort study performed to obtain concomitant histopathology and genetic information in mCRPC. Methods: Patients with mCRPC initiating abiraterone acetate therapy underwent 2 serial (3 months apart) metastatic (met) site needle core biopsies (NCB1/2). Bone lesions were biopsied using 11-13G core needles and 18G core biopsy devices were used for non-osseous masses. Up to 4 cores were obtained at each biopsy with the 1st core (S1) sent for DNA sequencing, the 2nd (S2) for RNA sequencing, and the 3rd/4th (X3, X4) submitted for xenograft implantation. From each, 1-2 mm segments were separated and formalin-fixed for histopathologic examination (HPE). Results: A total of 54 patients, enrolled between June 2013 and July 2014, underwent 94 NCB (54 NCB1, 40 NCB2), rendering a total of 259 samples (94 S1; 75 S2; 59 X3 and 31 X4) of which 85 (32%) were positive (pos) for tumor by HPE. Positivity for tumor in S1, S2, X3, and X4 cores was 42%, 33%, 22%, and 19%, respectively. At least one core pos for met tumor was observed in 62% NCB1 and 52% NCB2 (overall 52/94; 56%). Met sites biopsied include bone (71), lymph nodes (18), liver (3), penile (1) and pelvic (1) soft tissues. HPE revealed met adenocarcinoma in 44/52, and poorly differentiated carcinoma in 8/52. Gleason grade applied to the met ranged from 3+4 to 5+5. 45/85 pos samples (53%) had > 50% tumor cellularity. Pos NCB in bone lesions was observed in 23/71 (32%), compared to 17/23 (73%) of non-bone sites (p=.0004). 85 S1 samples yielded DNA material, of which 66 (77%) had ≥10% tumoral DNA. 24 cases with negative HPE had ≥10% tumoral DNA; 7 cases with pos HPE had <10 tumoral DNA. In all, 76/94 (81%) NCB yielded tumor material either by HPE or DNA analysis. Conclusions: NCB of mCRPC is feasible and provides adequate tissue for pursuing HPE and sequencing studies. HPE of extracted material correlates with DNA sequencing data and provides complementary information on tumor features. Bone lesions yield significantly less tumoral material than non-osseous sites.

174 Background: AA/P is an FDA approved treatment for mCRPC. Since markers of early resistance to AA/P are unknown, we report initial findings of androgen receptor (AR) based associations with short term (12 week) progression on AA/P. Methods: mCRPC stage patients (pts) initiating pre-chemotherapy AA/P underwent metastatic site biopsies at baseline (pre AA/P) and after 12 weeks. Baseline somatic whole exome DNA, tumor gene expression for AR full length (ARFL), AR splice variant 7 (ARV7) and ARV7/ARFL ratios were compared in progessors versus non-progressors. Progression at or within 12 weeks of AA/P therapy was defined as death or disease progression by PCWG2 “composite progression (CP)” and/or “radiographic progression” endpoints. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to test for differences in the two groups for comparing ARFL, ARV7 expressions and ARV7/ARFL ratios and chi square tests were used for differences in copy number variation. Results: Between 1/2013 and 6/2014, 59 pts were enrolled of which 44 have disease assessment data at the12-week time point. CP was observed in 17/44 patients. DNA seq and clinical data was available for 42/44 pts. Using radiographic progression at 12 weeks, AR Amplification/Gain was observed in 20/26 non-progressors (13 with Amplification) and in 9/16 progressors (P-value = 0.19; OR 2.5). ARFL and ARV7 gene expressions in both groups is provided in table. Conclusions: A trend towards higher ARV7/ARFL gene expression ratio in metastases was observed with early progression on AA/P. AR gain/amplification is observed less often in pts with early progression. Validation of these findings is on-going in this prospective trial. Clinical trial information: NCT# 01953640. [Table: see text]

247 Background: There are no prospective and few large retrospective studies of male breast cancer (MBC). This study’s aim was to describe our institutional experience with MBC and evaluate the ability of the AJCC staging system to stratify survival. Methods: All MBC cases were identified from our institution’s cancer registry from 1984-2008. Data collected included tumor characteristics, lymph node status, treatment, age, and survival. Results: During the study period 166 MBC cases were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range 27-87). Most common presentation was a palpable breast mass (77%). Stage at diagnosis was stage 0 (6%), stage 1 (27%), stage 2 (36%), stage 3 (17%), stage 4 (5%), and unknown (9%). Procedure performed was mastectomy in 148 patients (89%), lumpectomy in 10 patients (6%) and unknown in 8 patients (5%). Median tumor size was 2.0 cm (range 0.2-11.0 cm). Most common histology was invasive ductal carcinoma (91%). Estrogen and progesterone receptor status assessed at diagnosis was positive in 93% and 86% of cases tested respectively. HER2/neu status was positive in 6 of 47 cases tested (13%). Nodal staging was performed by axillary dissection (AD) (70%), sentinel node biopsy (SN) alone (11%), SN and AD (11%) and no axillary staging (8%); 43% were node positive, 47% node negative and 10% unknown. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 40 patients (24%), adjuvant hormonal therapy to 42 patients (25%) and adjuvant radiation therapy was used in 33 cases (20%). With a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 86 patients (52%) have died: 44 due to breast cancer, 23 due to causes unrelated to breast cancer, and in 19 the cause of death is unknown. Median overall survival was 9.3 years. Median cancer-specific survival was 16.0 years. For patients initially diagnosed at stage 2, 3, and 4 median cancer-specific survival was 12.9, 7.2, and 0.8 years respectively. Median cancer-specific survival was significantly different for stages 2 vs. 3 (p = 0.03) and 3 vs. 4 (p = 0.0006). Conclusions: MBC most commonly presents as a palpable mass, is hormone responsive, and is most commonly treated with mastectomy. The TNM system appropriately stratifies men with MBC by duration of survival.