Back to Authors

Initiative, EADC‐ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging

Mayo Clinic

University of Geneva

Citations 1

Operationalizing protocol differences for EADC‐ADNI manual hippocampal segmentation
Boccardi, Marina , Bocchetta, Martina , Ganzola, Rossana , Robitaille, Nicolas , Redolfi, Alberto , Duchesne, Simon , Jack, Clifford R. , Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Initiative, EADC‐ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Bartzokis, George, Csernansky, John G., deToledo‐Morrell, Leyla, Lehéricy, Stéphane , Malykhin, Nikolai , Pantel, Johannes, Pruessner, Jens C. , Watson, Craig, Boccardi, Marina , Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Initiative, EADC‐ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Segmentation and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Leon, Mony J. de , Killiany, Ronald , Soininen, Hilkka S. , Jack, Clifford R , Bocchetta, Martina

Alzheimer's & Dementia | May 21, 2013 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 184-194

10.1016/j.jalz.2013.03.001 Get It

AbstractBackgroundHippocampal volumetry on magnetic resonance imaging is recognized as an Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker, and manual segmentation is the gold standard for measurement. However, a standard procedure is lacking. We operationalize and quantitate landmark differences to help a Delphi panel converge on a set of landmarks.MethodsOne hundred percent of anatomic landmark variability across 12 different protocols for manual segmentation was reduced into four segmentation units (the minimum hippocampus, the alveus/fimbria, the tail, and the subiculum), which were segmented on magnetic resonance images by expert raters to estimate reliability and AD‐related atrophy.ResultsIntra‐ and interrater reliability were more than 0.96 and 0.92, respectively, except for the alveus/fimbria, which were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. Of all AD‐related atrophy, the minimum hippocampus contributed to 67%; tail, 24%; alveus/fimbria, 4%; and the subiculum, 5%.ConclusionsAnatomic landmark variability in available protocols can be reduced to four discrete and measurable segmentation units. Their quantitative assessment will help a Delphi panel to define a set of landmarks for a harmonized protocol.