Objective: Health care delivery has undergone a shift from in-person visits to more remote consultations via telehealth. Despite the increasing adoption of telehealth for tertiary medical centers’ new patient visits, its impact on subsequent in-person health care utilization has not been widely studied. Our objective was to examine differences in health care services used by patients who established care in-person versus those who initiated care remotely via telehealth. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who established care at one of our three main Mayo Clinic campuses through either an in-person or telemedicine visit between September 1, 2023, and September 30, 2024. We analyzed aggregate data related to downstream in-person services encompassing diagnostic studies, outpatient procedures, surgical procedures (referred to as “surgical yield”), specialist consultations, and follow-up appointments. Results: This study evaluated 252,356 new patient visits, of which 14,915 (5.9%) were performed remotely via telemedicine. Patients who established care in-person had an average of 10.47 subsequent in-person visits. Among patients who initiated care via telemedicine, 62.7% (9,351) later received in-person services, with an average of 16 in-person visits per patient. Surgical yield was higher for patients who started remotely via telehealth and then came on-site, at 29% compared to 16% for those who started with an on-site visit. States bordering the clinic locations had increased percentages of in-person visits compared to states that required patients to travel longer distances. Conclusions: Patients who established care through an initial telemedicine appointment and then came on-site had more downstream encounters and surgical procedures than those who began in-person. This may be due to the ability to efficiently coordinate multiple appointments within a condensed timeframe, optimizing the planning of on-site visits. Additionally, both patients and providers may selectively utilize telemedicine to identify individuals who would derive the greatest benefit from in-person care.
Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Small Intestinal Malignancy
Abstract Background Prior studies have examined small intestinal dysplasia and cancer in Crohn’s disease; however, there is limited information on ulcerative colitis (UC). We describe characteristics of small intestinal dysplasia and cancer in patients with UC. In this study, we aimed to identify common characteristics between patients with UC that were diagnosed with small intestinal malignancy. Methods Electronic medical records were reviewed for 3 tertiary referral centers to identify patients with a diagnosis of UC and small intestinal dysplasia or cancer between 2010 and 2023. Data collection included demographics, family history of gastrointestinal malignancy, UC diagnosis date, duration and location of disease, prior UC medical treatment or surgery, diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), PSC-related complications, and details of cancer or dysplasia. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results Thirty-five patients (60% male, mean age of diagnosis 39.3 ± 21.5 years old) were identified with UC and subsequent small intestinal dysplasia or cancer. Most had pancolitis (74.3%) or pancolitis with backwash ileitis (8.57%). Half underwent surgery for their UC, and half of these had the cancer or dysplasia found at the time of surgery. Ileal dysplasia was found in 2 patients (5.71%), duodenal adenocarcinoma in 2 (5.71%), ileal adenocarcinoma 2 (5.71%), duodenal carcinoid in 4 (11.4%), ileal carcinoid in 24 (68.6%), other duodenal neuroendocrine tumor in 1 (2.86%). Primary sclerosing cholangitis was diagnosed in 5 patients (14%), and 3 required liver transplants. Conclusions Small intestinal dysplasia and cancer are rare in this population. Most patients with small intestinal cancer or dysplasia were male, Caucasian, and had a history of extensive colitis. Ileal carcinoid had the highest incidence. Gastroenterologists should be aware of this finding in patients with UC.
Diagnosing and managing gastroparesis - where are we now?
A male patient in his 70s with a history of tobacco use, organising pneumonia and rheumatoid arthritis that had been treated for several years with rituximab currently being treated with tocilizumab, presented with progressively worsening shortness of breath, increasing oxygen requirements and weakness. He had a history of COVID-19 infection 6 months prior to presentation. Initial COVID-19 PCR testing at presentation was negative. Bronchoalveolar lavage was positive for COVID-19 but negative for spike antibodies. It was thought that he did not clear his prior COVID-19 infection due to his immunocompromised state while taking rituximab. On recommendation of infectious disease, he was treated with a prolonged course of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir and corticosteroids with significant symptom improvement.
Purpose of review Functional dyspepsia is a common gastrointestinal disease that is under-recognized and under-diagnosed. It is a complex disorder of gut–brain interaction with no FDA-approved treatment options. The purpose of this review is to highlight updates in the proposed pathophysiology and present new data regarding potential therapies for functional dyspepsia. Recent findings Alterations in the intestinal microbiome and integrity of the intestinal membrane may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia. The low FODMAP diet, in addition to modulating the microbiome with antibiotics and probiotics, are targets for large future studies. Novel methods of delivery of gut–brain therapies have shown promising results, especially virtual reality. Summary The pathophysiology and management of functional dyspepsia is complex and there is still much unknown; however, continued research is identifying new targets for treatment. New and more targeted treatment options provide clinicians a variety of tools to offer patients with functional dyspepsia.
Esophageal Stricture Recalcitrant to Repeated Dilation in Complex Rheumatological Disease
ABSTRACT We report a case of severe refractory esophageal strictures in the setting of rheumatological disease found to be secondary to isolated esophageal autoimmune bullous disease. She had a history of Sjogren syndrome and esophageal strictures with many previous dilations. After rheumatological workup, she was diagnosed with mixed connective tissue disease. Biopsy showed complement and immunoglobulin G deposition in the basement membrane consistent with bullous lupus or bullous pemphigoid. She had no cutaneous bullae and was diagnosed with isolated esophageal bullous disease. She required multiple dilatations over several months of treatment and was started on mycophenolate mofetil with clinical improvement.
Diagnosis, symptoms, and treatment knowledge of aberrant right subclavian artery in followers of a social media group