Abstract Background The left ventricular (LV) force, also known as elastance, serves as a load-independent indicator of contractility and can be noninvasively assessed through echocardiography. In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the heightened presence of the active state of myosin heads results in an increased LV force. Purpose To assess the prognostic value of increased LV elastance at rest in patients with HCM. Methods We enrolled 1420 HCM patients (age 50±16 years, 907 males, 64%) with ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%, referred for rest transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 10 quality-controlled labs from 7 countries. TTE assessment included peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG), EF, and LV force (systolic blood pressure + LVOTG/LV end-systolic volume assessed with 2-D, mmHg/mL). All patients were followed up. All-cause death was the outcome measure. Results At a median follow-up of 83 months, 150 deaths occurred (Group 1). At study entry, Group 1 patients had the same ESC-Sudden cardiac death score compared to survivors (Group 2). In Group 1 compared to Group 2, TTE showed higher values of MR severity, E/e’ , left atrial volume index, estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure, and force (see table). At multivariable Cox analysis, only age (HR =1.08, 95% CI=1.03-1.14, p=0.001) and force > median value of 5.3 mmHg/mL (HR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.53-2.99, p=0.020) were independent predictors of mortality. Ten-year survival was 95% in the pooled first (<3.8 mmHg/mL) and second (3.8-5.2 mmHg/mL) quartiles vs 80% in the pooled third (5.3-7.8 mmHg/mL) and fourth quartiles (>7.8 mmHg/mL), see figure. Conclusion HCM patients with higher values of resting LV elastance show a worse survival, highlighting the dark prognostic side of an excess of force in these patients. Table Legends E/e’, early mitral inflow to early mitral annulus motion ratio, EF, left ventricular ejection fraction, LAVI, left atrial volume index; LVOTG, left ventricular outflow tract peak gradient, MR, mitral regurgitation; MWT, maximal wall thickness, NYHA, New York Heart Association classification, RWT, relative wall thickness; SCD risk, risk score for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, SPAP, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure.Table.Clinical and TTE findingsFigure.Survival in the force quartiles
Acute myocarditis associated with desmosomal gene variants
Abstract Background The risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocarditis (AM) and desmosomal gene variants (DGV) remains unknown. Purpose To ascertain the risk of death, ventricular arrhythmias, recurrent myocarditis, and heart failure (main endpoint) in patients with AM and pathogenic or likely pathogenetic DGV. Methods In a retrospective international study from 23 hospitals, 97 patients were included: 36 with AM and DGV (DGV(+)), 25 with AM and negative gene testing (DGV(−)), and 36 AM patients without genetics (w/o genetics). All patients had troponin elevation plus findings consistent with AM on histology or at cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). In 86 patients CMRI changes in function and structure were re-assessed at follow-up. Results In the DGV(+) AM group (88.9% DSP variants), median age was 24 years, 91.7% presented with chest pain, and median left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was 56% on CMRI (p=NS vs. the other 2 groups). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a higher risk of the main endpoint in DGV(+) AM compared to DGV(−) and w/o genetics patients (62.3% vs. 17.5% vs. 5.3% at 5 years respectively; p<0.0001), driven by myocarditis recurrence and ventricular arrhythmias (Figure 1A, B). At follow-up CMRI, a higher number of late-gadolinium enhanced segments was found in DGV(+) AM. Conclusions Patients with AM and evidence of DGV have a higher incidence of adverse cardiovascular events compared with AM patients without DGV. Further prospective studies are needed to ascertain if genetic testing might improve risk stratification of patients with AM who are considered at low risk. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Italian Ministry of Health