Rehan, Syeda Tayyaba

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common emergency condition with high morbidity, mortality, and socio-economic impact. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a potential biomarker for AP prognosis. This study systematically reviews the literature on suPAR’s prognostic roles in assessing AP severity, organ failure, mortality, and other pathological markers. Methods: A comprehensive search of 5 databases up to March 19, 2023, was conducted, selecting cohort studies that examined suPAR’s relationship with AP outcomes. Outcome variables included AP severity, organ failure, mortality, hospital stay length, and suPAR’s association with other inflammatory markers. Our paper has been registered on Prospero (ID: CRD42023410628). Results: Nine prospective observational studies with 1033 AP patients were included. Seven of eight studies found suPAR significantly elevated in severe acute pancreatitis ( P < .05). Four studies showed suPAR effectively predicted organ failure risk, and 4 studies concluded suPAR significantly predicted mortality ( P < .05). The review had no high-risk studies, enhancing credibility. Conclusion: suPAR is a valuable prognostic marker in AP, significantly predicting severity, organ failure, hospital stay length, and mortality. Further large-scale studies are needed to explore suPAR’s role in other clinical outcomes related to AP disease course, to establish it as a mainstay of AP prognosis.

Abstract Introduction An unusual association between thyroid dysfunction and autoimmune encephalitis (AE) was noticed when patients presented with low free triiodothyronine (fT3) levels and antithyroid antibodies. We conducted a meta‐analysis to investigate whether thyroid dysfunction, that is, lower fT3 levels are associated with worsening clinical manifestations and prognosis in patients with AE. Methods Literature search of five electronic databases was performed till April 5, 2023. Inclusion criteria were as follows: Observational studies reporting patients with all subtypes of AE and assessing thyroid dysfunction categorized as low fT3 and non‐low fT3. Primary endpoints included modified Rankin scale (mRS) at admission, abnormal magnetic resonance imaging, length of stay, seizures, and consciousness declination. Results Comprehensive literature search resulted in 5127 studies. After duplicate removal and full‐text screening, six observational studies were included in this analysis. Patients with low fT3 were 2.95 times more likely to experience consciousness declination ( p = .0003), had higher mRS at admission ( p < .00001), had 3.14 times increased chances of having a tumor ( p = .003), were 3.88 times more likely to experience central hypoventilation, and were 2.36 times more likely to have positivity for antithyroid antibodies ( p = .009) as compared to patients with non‐low fT3. Conclusion The findings of our study suggest that low fT3 levels might be related to a more severe disease state, implying the significance of thyroid hormones in AE pathogenesis. This finding is crucial in not only improving the early diagnosis of severe AE but also in the efficient management of the disease.

Rationale: Dengue fever is a widespread mosquito-borne viral disease, most prevalent in the tropical and subtropical areas of the world. There has been a significant rise in the incidence and number of outbreaks of dengue in recent years, which has made it a matter of global concern. It may be associated with a number of renal complications, ranging from hematuria, proteinuria, glomerulonephritis, and acute tubular necrosis. However, renal cortical necrosis (RCN) is a rare renal complication of this disease. Patients concerns: We report the case of a young gentleman who presented with fever, vomiting, and anuria. On workup, he was found to be having complicated Dengue fever with RCN resulting in acute renal failure. Diagnosis: To the best of our knowledge, RCN is not a reported renal complication of dengue fever. Interventions and outcomes: Our report highlights the importance of early consideration of renal cortical necrosis in patients with dengue fever and persistent anuria. Lesson: This would allow for better disease prognostication while enabling physicians to develop more effective treatment strategies.

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection has taken the world by storm within a few months. Evidence has suggested that patients with electrolyte imbalances at baseline may have a longer duration of hospital stay. We aimed to determine the factors associated with hyponatremia on admission in COVID-19 patients and its impact on the length of stay. We conducted a retrospective study including 521 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and had their electrolytes checked on admission from June 2020 to October 2020. Patients with sodium <135 mmol/l were included in the hyponatremic group and were compared against normonatremic patients. The severity of COVID-19 was found to be more prevalent in the case group as compared to control (38.3% vs 29.2%; 21.1% vs 17.7%). Hyponatremic patients stayed more than 5 days in hospital (56.3% vs 46.5%), and stayed longer in special care (23.4% vs 20.0%) as compared to controls. Hyponatremic patients as compared to control were more likely to have diabetes (47.9% vs 30.0%), hypertension (49.0% vs 38.5%), ischemic heart disease (20.7% vs 15.4%), chronic liver disease (2.7% vs 1.2%), and chronic kidney disease (9.6% vs 3.8%). Upon matching on the age, the adjusted odds of hyponatremia in COVID-19-positive patients were 1.9 times among diabetic patients. Moreover, COVID-19-positive patients suffering from CKD had a higher risk of developing hyponatremia (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.1–5.6). The risk of hyponatremia among COVID-19-positive patients is statistically higher in patients with 1 comorbidity (OR = 1.9, 95%CI: 1.3–3.4). Hyponatremia on admission can be used to forecast the length of hospital stay and the severity of illness in COVID-19 patients.

Background: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an inflammatory biomarker that is used to predict mortality, readmission, early discharge, and LOS, thus, serves as a useful tool for ED physicians. Our study aims to analyze the efficacy of suPAR in predicting these prognostic markers in ED. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search on 6 databases from the inception to 30th November 2022, to select the following eligibility criteria; a) observation or triage trial studies investigating the role of suPAR levels in predicting: 30 day and 90-day mortality, 30-day readmission, early discharge (within 24hr), and LOS in patients coming to AMU. Results: A total of 13 studies were included, with a population size of 35,178, of which 52.9% were female with a mean age of 62.93 years. Increased risk of 30-day mortality (RR = 10.52; 95% CI = 4.82–22.95; I2 = 38%; P < .00001), and risk of 90-day mortality (RR = 5.76; 95% CI = 3.35–9.91; I2 = 36%; P < .00001) was observed in high suPAR patients. However, a slightly increased risk was observed for 30-day readmission (RR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.16–1.94; I2 = 54%; P = .002). More people were discharged within 24hr in the low suPAR level group compared to high suPAR group (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.40–0.53; I2 = 41%; P < .00001). LOS was thrice as long in high suPAR level patients than in patients with low suPAR (WMD = 3.20; 95% CI = 1.84–4.56; I2 = 99%; P < .00001). Conclusion: suPAR is proven to be a significant marker in predicting 30-day and 90-day mortality in ED patients.

AbstractBackgroundThe menstrual cycle in women is the main indicator of their reproductive health which is affected by the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. This review aims to summarize the effects of the COVID‐19 infection and the global pandemic on the menstrual health of women.MethodsThe literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar using keywords “COVID‐19,” “Menstrual Cycle,” “Menstrual Cycle Irregularities,” “Amenorrhea,” “Polymenorrhea,” and “Dysmenorrhea.” The articles were selected according to the following inclusion criteria: (i) cross‐sectional studies, (ii) cohort studies, (iii) surveys, and (iv) other observational studies observing the effects of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or COVID‐19 pandemic on menstrual health of women. Exclusion criteria included: case reports, gray literature, and website articles regarding menstrual health.ResultsA total of 30,510 articles were shortlisted after a comprehensive search. Sixteen articles were included out of which 13 studies investigated the effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the menstrual cycle while 3 evaluated the possible effects of COVID‐19 infection on the menstrual health of women. Menstrual disorders or irregularities were a more common finding during the pandemic as compared to before (p = 0.008). Women affected by pandemic‐related stress were more prone to changes in the duration of their menses (p = 0.0008), reported heavier bleeding (p = 0.028), and increased incidence of painful periods (p < 0.0001). COVID‐19 infected women also reported changes in their menstrual cycle including irregular menstruation, increased symptoms of premenstrual syndrome, and infrequent menstruation.ConclusionsWomen suffering from COVID‐19 infection or pandemic‐associated stress and anxiety were more likely to experience irregular menstruation, dysmenorrhea, amenorrhea, and other menstrual abnormalities compared to those who were less exposed.