Li, Neill Y.

Background: Shoulder function after spinal nerve grafting in pan–brachial plexus injuries (pan-BPI) is not well described. The authors evaluated shoulder abduction (ABD) and external rotation (ER) after spinal nerve grafting to the suprascapular nerve, axillary nerve, or posterior division of the upper trunk and determined patient characteristics, injury severity and characteristics, and nerve graft factors that influenced outcomes. Methods: A total of 362 patients undergoing pan-BPI reconstruction and spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation in a single institution between 2001 and 2018 were reviewed. Patient demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), graft characteristics, strength, range of motion for shoulder ABD and ER, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on recovery of shoulder function: no return, ABD only, and ABD and ER. Results: A total of 110 patients underwent spinal nerve grafting, with 41 meeting inclusion criteria. Seventeen (41.5%) had no return of shoulder function, 14 (34.1%) had ABD alone, and 10 (24.4%) had ABD and ER. Patients with recovery of both ABD and ER were significantly younger (18.6 ± 5.56 years), had lower body mass index (22.4 ± 4.0), and had a lower ISS (10.5 ± 6.24; P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis found that with increasing age (OR, 0.786; 95% CI, 0.576, 0.941) and ISS (OR, 0.820; 95% CI, 0.606, 0.979), odds for return of ABD and ER decreased significantly. Conclusions: In pan-BPI, 24.4% of patients demonstrated return of both ABD and ER after spinal nerve grafting to suprascapular nerve and either axillary nerve or posterior division of the upper trunk. Age, body mass index, and ISS were associated with poorer recovery of shoulder function. Careful patient selection and consideration of age, body mass index, and ISS may improve outcomes of spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

AbstractSegmental loss of the sciatic nerve secondary to oncologic resection or trauma is detrimental to hamstring and leg function. The diameter of this nerve and the length of its axons spanning the lower extremity create significant challenges in reconstruction and optimizing return of sensory or motor function. The purpose of this report is to describe outcomes of a free vascularized sural nerve graft to preserve hamstring function in a large proximal sciatic nerve defect beginning at the greater sciatic foramen. A 44‐year‐old female underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation for treatment of a left sciatic nerve synovial cell sarcoma. The patient underwent R0 resection of the proximal left sciatic nerve resulting in a 15 cm defect. An ipsilateral vascularized sural nerve graft was used to reconstruct the medial aspect of the sciatic nerve, prioritizing the tibial division, in an effort to restore hamstring function and plantar sensation. A 5 cm allograft nerve was added to the cutaneous branches of the sural nerve graft to better span the large defect and reconstruct the lateral aspect of the nerve. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. At 1‐year follow‐up, the patient showed MRC grade 4/5 strength with knee flexion and steady gait pattern with a left ankle‐foot orthosis. Outcomes support the use of a single vascularized nerve graft alongside acellular nerve allograft to restore motor function in large diameter and large defect mixed nerve injuries.