Citations 426

Outcomes of patients with POEMS syndrome treated initially with radiation
Humeniuk, Michael, Lacy, Martha Q. , Kyle, Robert A. , Kumar, Shaji , Kapoor, Prashant , Lust, John A., Hayman, Suzanne R. , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Zeldenrust, Steven R., Russell, Stephen J. , Dingli, David , Lin, Yi , Leung, Nelson , Dispenzieri, Angela , Humeniuk, Michael S, Gertz, Morie A. , Witzig, Thomas E. , Buadi, Francis K. , Rajkumar, S Vincent , Leung, Nelson , Dispenzieri, Angela , Russell, Stephen J , Dingli, David , Lin, Yi

Blood | May 23, 2013 | Volume: 122 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 68-73

10.1182/blood-2013-03-487025 Get It

Key PointsRadiation is appropriate primary therapy in approximately 25% of cases. Radiation provides long-term remissions in more than 50% of patients.
Systemic amyloidosis associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma
Kourelis, Taxiarchis , Lacy, Martha Q. , Kyle, Robert A. , Kapoor, Prashant , Zeldenrust, Steven R., Hayman, Suzanne R. , Lust, John A., Russell, Stephen J. , Lin, Yi , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Kumar, Shaji , Leung, Nelson , Dingli, David , Dispenzieri, Angela , Gertz, Morie A. , Zent, Clive S. , Buadi, Francis K. , Witzig, Thomas E. , Rajkumar, S Vincent , Leung, Nelson , Dispenzieri, Angela , Russell, Stephen J , Dingli, David , Lin, Yi

American Journal of Hematology | February 12, 2013 | Volume: 88 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 375-378

10.1002/ajh.23413 Get It

To clarify the presentation and course of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and amyloidosis. Mayo databases were interrogated for patients who carried a diagnosis of amyloidosis and CLL evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from January 1974 to October 2012. Charts were abstracted and data analyzed. Of the 33 patients identified, 20 (61%) were diagnosed with AL and 13 (39%) with non‐AL. Only four patients had immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) that could be solely attributed to the CLL clone; another six had both a plasma cell clone and a CLL clone that shared the same light chain. Median overall survival was 15.6 months for patients with AL and 58.1 months for patients with non‐AL. For patients with AL management involved chemotherapy targeted toward monoclonal plasma cells, lymphocytes or both, and for patients with non‐AL no specific amyloid treatment was administered. AL is a rare complication of CLL, but in this elderly population of patients non‐AL is nearly as common. Distinguishing between these two groups is essential since patients with non‐AL amyloidosis have better outcomes and they do not require cytotoxic chemotherapy to treat their amyloidosis. Am. J. Hematol. 88:375–378, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The role of phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 and focal adhesion kinase in aggressive multiple myeloma
Lin, Yi , Gertz, Morie A. , Lin, Yi

Leukemia & Lymphoma | January 6, 2012 | Volume: 53 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1021-1022

10.3109/10428194.2011.654340 Get It

Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment and Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease
Lin, Yi , Hogan, William J. , Lin, Yi

Advances in Hematology | December 10, 2011 | Volume: 2011 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-17

10.1155/2011/427863 Get It

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) represent a heterogeneous population of stromal cells with pluripotent mesenchymal differentiation potential. They have been found to have immunosuppressive properties and the ability to modulate angiogenesis and endogenous tissue repair byin vitroand animal studies. Clinical trials have examined the utility of these cells in autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. In particular, in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), multiple studies have been conducted to explore the use of MSC to treat acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and for cotransplantation with HSCT to promote HSC engraftment and prevent GVHD. We review here the results of these studies and discuss some challenges of this treatment modality in this disease setting.
Immunosuppressive CD14+HLA-DRlow/− monocytes in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Lin, Yi , Bulur, Peggy A. , Gastineau, Dennis A. , Dietz, Allan B. , Gustafson, Michael P. , Witzig, Thomas E. , Dietz, Allan B , Lin, Yi

Blood | November 10, 2010 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 872-881

10.1182/blood-2010-05-283820 Get It

AbstractImmunosuppression is a known risk factor for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), yet mechanisms of tumor-associated immunosuppression remain to be fully characterized. We examined the immunophenotype of 40 NHL patients and 27 age-matched healthy volunteers to better understand systemic immune suppression. NHL peripheral blood mononuclear cells had significantly decreased interferon-γ production and proliferation. This suppression was not the result of regulatory T cells, interleukin-6 or interleukin-10, as these factors were not different between NHL and healthy volunteers (controls). We were able to restore T-cell proliferation by removing NHL monocytes, suggesting that these monocytes are suppressive. This suppression was mediated in part through arginine metabolism as exogenous arginine supplementation partially overcame monocytes' suppression of T-cell proliferation in vitro and NHL patients had elevated arginase I in their plasma. NHL monocytes had impaired STAT1 phosphorylation and interferon-α production to CpG stimulation and a dendritic cell differentiation deficiency. Further studies demonstrated that monocytes from NHL patients had decreased HLA-DR and Tumor necrosis factor-α receptor II (CD120b) expression compared with controls (CD14+HLA-DRlow/−CD120blow). Patients with increased ratios of CD14+HLA-DRlow/− monocytes had more aggressive disease and suppressed immune functions. In summary, we report that CD14+HLA-DRlow/− monocytes are a major and multifactorial contributor to systemic immunosuppression in NHL.
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Carriers Protect Oncolytic Measles Viruses from Antibody Neutralization in an Orthotopic Ovarian Cancer Therapy Model
Mader, Emily K., Maeyama, Yoshihiro, Lin, Yi , Butler, Greg W., Russell, Holly , Russell, Stephen J. , Dietz, Allan B. , Peng, Kah-Whye , Galanis, Evanthia , Dietz, Allan B , Russell, Stephen J , Lin, Yi

Clinical Cancer Research | November 25, 2009 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 7246-7255

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-1292 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Preexisting antiviral antibodies in cancer patients can quickly neutralize oncolytic measles virus (MV) and decrease its antitumor potency. In contrast to “naked” viruses, cell-associated viruses are protected from antibody neutralization. Hence, we hypothesized that measles virotherapy of ovarian cancer in measles-immune mice might be superior if MV-infected mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) carriers are used. Experimental Design: Antimeasles antibodies titers in ovarian cancer patients were determined. The protection of MV by MSC from antimeasles antibodies, the in vivo biodistribution profiles, and tumor infiltration capability of MSC were determined. Measles-naïve or immune tumor–bearing mice were treated with naked virus or MSC-associated virus and mice survivals were compared. Results: MSC transferred MV infection to target cells via cell-to-cell heterofusion and induced syncytia formation in the presence of high titers of antimeasles antibody, at levels that completely inactivated naked virus. Athymic mice bearing i.p. human SKOV3ip.1 ovarian tumor xenografts passively immunized with measles-immune human serum were treated with saline, naked MV, or MV-infected MSC. Bioluminescent and fluorescent imaging data indicated that i.p. administered MSC localized to peritoneal tumors, infiltrated into the tumor parenchyma, and transferred virus infection to tumors in measles naïve and passively immunized mice. Survival of the measles-immune mice was significantly enhanced by treatment with MV-infected MSC. In contrast, survivals of passively immunized mice were not prolonged by treatment with naked virus or uninfected MSC. Conclusions: MSC should be used as carriers of MV for intraperitoneal virotherapy in measles-immune ovarian cancer patients. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(23):7246–55)