Chen, Anita

Importance Urethral diverticulectomy is performed with or without concomitant pubovaginal sling (PVS). Patients with complex UD are more frequently offered concomitant PVS. However, there is paucity of literature comparing postoperative incontinence rates for patients with simple versus complex UD. Objective The objective of this study is to examine postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) rates after Urethral Diverticulectomy without concomitant PVS for both complex and simple cases. Study Design A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 55 patients who underwent Urethral Diverticulectomy from 2007 to 2021. Preoperative SUI was patient-reported and confirmed with cough stress test result. Complex cases were defined as circumferential or horseshoe configurations, prior diverticulectomy, and/or anti-incontinence procedure. Primary outcome was postoperative SUI. Secondary outcome was interval PVS. Complex and simple cases were compared using the Fisher exact test. Results Median age was 49 years (interquartile range, 36–58 years). Median follow-up was 5.4 months (IQR, 2–24 months). Thirty of 55 (55%) cases were simple, and 25 of 55 (45%) complex. Preoperative SUI was present in 19/57 (35%) (11 complex vs 8 simple, P = 0.25). Stress urinary incontinence persisted postoperatively in 10 of 19 (52%) (6 complex vs 4 simple, P = 0.48). De novo SUI occurred in 7 of 55, 12% (4 complex vs 3 simple, P = 0.68). Overall, 17 of 55 (31%) patients had postoperative SUI (10 complex vs 7 simple, P = 0.24). Of those, 8 of 17 underwent subsequent PVS placement (P = 0.71) and 9 of 17 had resolution of pad use after physical therapy (P = 0.27). Conclusions We did not find evidence of an association between complexity and postoperative SUI. Age at surgery and preoperative frequency were the strongest predictors of postoperative SUI in this cohort. Our findings suggest successful complex urethral diverticulum repair does not require concomitant PVS.

Abstract Purpose Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is first line therapy for treatment of myofascial pelvic pain (MFPP). Pelvic floor trigger point injections (PFTPI) are added if symptoms are refractive to conservative therapy or if patients experience a flare. The primary objective was to determine if a session of physical therapy with myofascial release immediately following PFTPI provides improved pain relief compared to trigger point injection alone. Methods This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 87 female patients with MFPP who underwent PFTPI alone or PFTPI immediately followed by PFPT. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded pre-treatment and 2 weeks post-treatment. The primary outcome was the change in VAS between patients who received PFTPI alone and those who received PFTPI followed by myofascial release. Results Of the 87 patients in this study, 22 received PFTPI alone and 65 patients received PFTPI followed by PFPT. The median pre-treatment VAS score was 8 for both groups. The median post-treatment score was 6 for the PFTPI only group and 4 for the PFTPI followed by PFPT group, showing a median change in VAS score of 2 and 4 respectively (p = 0.042). Seventy-seven percent of patients in the PFTPI followed by PFPT group had a VAS score improvement of 3 or more, while 45% of patients in the PFTPI only group had a VAS score improvement greater than 3 (p = 0.008). Conclusions PFTPI immediately followed by PFPT offered more improvement in pain for patients with MFPP. This may be due to greater tolerance of myofascial release immediately following injections.