Neugarten, Carter

Palliative care (PC) has been shown to improve quality of life (QoL), reduce symptom burden, and align care with patient goals in those with serious illnesses. However, its integration into the emergency department (ED), where many patients with advanced illness present, remains underexplored and inconsistently applied. This narrative review evaluates several recent studies on ED-based palliative care, aiming to clarify whether the early benefits in symptom management and QoL are associated with reduced healthcare utilization and cost. A comprehensive literature search identified five new key studies with significant methodological differences, including variations in patient populations, outcome measures, and study designs. Some studies demonstrated short-term symptom relief, yet only one showed significant improvements in QoL at long-term follow-up. For healthcare utilization, still only one of these new studies reported substantial cost savings, underscoring the need for further research to validate financial benefits. We suggest how future work should be designed to explore both clinical and economic outcomes in tandem to establish a clear value proposition for ED-based palliative care. By addressing this lack of cohesion, we can determine the merit of ED-palliative care integrations with the goal of improving patient care and optimizing resource utilization.

Background: While the benefits of embedding palliative care (PC) clinicians into the emergency department (ED) are now more widely appreciated, only a handful of programs have been reported in the literature. None has previously evaluated the attitudes and experiences of the multidisciplinary ED team with such an intervention. Objectives: We evaluated the experience of ED attendings, residents, nurses, social workers, and chaplains with an embedded PC clinician in the ED. Design/Subjects: We embedded PC clinicians into an urban, academic ED in the United States and surveyed 142 ED clinicians about their experiences. We analyzed survey results using descriptive analysis for closed-ended responses and thematic analyses for open-ended responses. Measurements/Results: One hundred six of 141 clinicians responded (75% response rate). Quantitative analysis found that 99% of participants found the program valuable. Benefits of embedded PC included changing patients' management or care trajectory, freeing up ED providers for other tasks, contributing to provider education, helping providers feel more supported during their shifts, and adding to providers' skill sets and confidence in practicing primary PC. Most participants reported minimal barriers to engaging with PC. The qualitative analysis identified program approval, desire for expansion/continuation of the program, and ongoing education of ED staff. Important themes for future programs include staff education, PC proactivity, importance of adapting to the needs of the ED, and education regarding PC consultation criteria. Conclusions: ED clinicians' attitudes toward embedded PC reflected overall approval, with underlying themes of providers feeling more supported during their shifts, improved resource management, the perception of better patient care, and nursing empowerment.