Miyanji, Firoz

Background: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is an alternative to posterior fusion. There are limited prospective, multicenter data available on VBT following US Food and Drug Administration approval. We hypothesize that curve correction on first postoperative standing (first erect, FE) imaging is associated with higher rates of successful correction at final follow-up. Methods: All qualifying patients with AIS who underwent thoracic and lumbar VBT between 2019 and 2022 were prospectively enrolled from 9 institutions. Radiographic and clinical data were compared preoperatively, at FE, and at final follow-up with minimum of 2 years. Success was defined as major curve magnitude of ≤35° at final follow-up and no fusion surgery. Results: One hundred twenty-seven patients were enrolled (79.5% female), with mean follow-up 2.4 years. Mean age at surgery was 12.9 ± 1.4 years, most had bone age of Sanders 4 or lower (93/112, 83.0%). In average, 7.6 ± 1.7 levels were tethered. Mean preoperative major curve magnitude was 50 ± 8°, with mean initial correction at FE of 29 ± 8° (% correction, 39 ± 18%). At final follow-up, mean curve magnitude was maintained at 26 ± 11° (% correction, 45 ± 23%) despite 29% of tether breakage. Patients who had mean FE curve magnitude of ≤35° were 88% successful compared with only 60% in those with >35° on FE (p = 0.0021). Patients showed stable sagittal alignment across all timepoints. Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores improved significantly by 2 years (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This was the first prospective, multicenter study to assess outcomes of VBT for patients with AIS. VBT shows promise, but optimal results may depend on careful patient selection and surgical technique. FE major curve magnitude of ≤35° was associated with 88% success rate compared with only 60% success for those with poor correction. Level of Evidence: Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is a promising fusionless alternative for treating idiopathic scoliosis; however, limited data exist on the learning curve for this procedure. Previous studies are limited by single-center and short-term complication data. This multicenter study assesses the learning curve by evaluating improvements in operative characteristics over time and radiographic measurements up to 2 years postoperatively. Methods: As recorded from a multicenter registry, surgeons with ≥10 index AVBT procedures for patients with idiopathic scoliosis aged 16 years and below were included. Relationships between case number and multiple surgical variables were determined using Pearson correlation and linear regression testing. For identification of an inflection point, consecutive cases were plotted against operative time per level and fitted with a locally weighted scatterplot smoothing curve. Independent samples t test and χ 2 test were used to compare outcomes between cases before and after the inflection point. Outcomes of interest included demographic, surgical, and radiographic information at the baseline, immediate postoperative, and 2-year timepointswhere available. Results: Eight surgeons and 325 index AVBT patients met the inclusion criteria. Inverse relationships were identified between case number and estimated blood loss, operative time, anesthesia time, and fluoroscopic time per level ( P < 0.005). The inflection point was identified at 15 cases. Operative time, anesthesia time, and fluoroscopy time per level were greater in the first 15 cases compared with those after ( P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in demographic variables, intraoperative complications, or length of stay between the early and late cases. Greater correction in the major coronal curve, minor coronal curve, and coronal balance occurred in the cases performed after the inflection point ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: AVBT is a safe alternative to posterior spinal fusion and demonstrates a predictable improvement in surgical performance over time. Large improvements can be expected during the first 15 AVBT cases performed with minimal differences in complications. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Background: Prior “best practice guidelines” (BPG) have identified strategies to reduce the risk of acute deep surgical site infection (SSI), but there still exists large variability in practice. Further, there is still no consensus on which patients are “high risk” for SSI and how SSI should be diagnosed or treated in pediatric spine surgery. We sought to develop an updated, consensus-based BPG informed by available literature and expert opinion on defining high-SSI risk in pediatric spine surgery and on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of SSI in this high-risk population. Materials and Methods: After a systematic review of the literature, an expert panel of 21 pediatric spine surgeons was selected from the Harms Study Group based on extensive experience in the field of pediatric spine surgery. Using the Delphi process and iterative survey rounds, the expert panel was surveyed for current practices, presented with the systematic review, given the opportunity to voice opinions through a live discussion session and asked to vote regarding preferences privately. Two survey rounds were conducted electronically, after which a live conference was held to present and discuss results. A final electronic survey was then conducted for final voting. Agreement ≥70% was considered consensus. Items near consensus were revised if feasible to achieve consensus in subsequent surveys. Results: Consensus was reached for 17 items for defining high-SSI risk, 17 items for preventing, 6 for diagnosing, and 9 for treating SSI in this high-risk population. After final voting, all 21 experts agreed to the publication and implementation of these items in their practice. Conclusions: We present a set of updated consensus-based BPGs for defining high-risk and preventing, diagnosing, and treating SSI in high-risk pediatric spine surgery. We believe that this BPG can limit variability in practice and decrease the incidence of SSI in pediatric spine surgery. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.