Marso, Steven P.

Background: Cardiovascular risk factors have an impact on coronary atherosclerosis evolution. However, there is only limited information about the relationship between risk and atherosclerotic plaque as measured invasively by Intravascular Ultrasound Radiofrequency (IVUS-RF) analysis. The Aim of this study was to assess the impact of cardiovascular risk factors not only on overall coronary plaque volume but on coronary plaque composition. Methods: 990 patients from 42 centers were enrolled in the prospective, multicenter, non randomized, global VH-IVUS registry. Coronary lesions were measured by conventional and IVUS-VH parameters using 20MHz Intravascular Ultrasound catheter. The four IVUS-VH plaque components (Dense Calcium-DC, Necrotic Core-NC, Fibrous tissue-F, Fibro Fatty-FF) were analyzed in every recorded frame. The results were expressed as mean cross-sectional areas, and percentage of total plaque volume. Risk factor assessment included correlation with family history of myocardial infarction, past or current smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and laboratory measurements. Results: Patients with diabetes have an increased relative amount of NC (6.47±0.28% vs. 5.86±0.14%, p=0.037) and DC (4.58±0.27% vs. 3.90±0.14%, p=0.017), Patients with hypertension have an increased relative amount of FF, DC (4.35±0.16% vs. 3.57±0.17%, p=0.02) and NC (6.24±0.17% vs. 5.60±0.19%, p=0.01). Compared with patients with LDL cholesterol 160 mg/dl had higher plaque volume (342.1±26.2mm 3 vs. 318.6±10.7mm 3 ). Linear Regression Analysis showed a correlation between the level of HDL and F (r=−0.149, p<0.01), FF (r=−0 –106, p< 0.01), and NC (r=−0.90, p<0.05). The level of LDL correlated with F (r = 0.110, p < 0.01). Patients with prior MI have an increased percentage of F (30.03±0.59 % vs. 28.20±0.37 %, p<0.009). Smoking had no relevant effect on plaque composition. Conclusion: IVUS-RF analysis detects marked differences in coronary plaque depending on the risk factor profile with particular focus on lipid levels. Patients with greater amounts of necrotic core were associated with hypertension, myocardial infarction, and low HDL. This may have implications for prognosis and systemic treatment of patients with coronary artery disease.

Background— Current guidelines recommend surgical revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]) over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease. Few data are available describing revascularization patterns among these patients in the setting of non–ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Methods and Results— Using Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get with the Guidelines (ACTION Registry–GWTG), we compared the in-hospital use of different revascularization strategies (PCI versus CABG versus no revascularization) in diabetes mellitus patients with non–ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction who had angiography, demonstrating multivessel coronary artery disease between July 2008 and December 2014. Factors associated with use of CABG versus PCI were identified using logistic multivariable regression analyses. A total of 29 769 patients from 539 hospitals were included in the study, of which 10 852 (36.4%) were treated with CABG, 13 760 (46.2%) were treated with PCI, and 5157 (17.3%) were treated without revascularization. The overall use of revascularization increased over the study period with an increase in the proportion undergoing PCI (45% to 48.9%; P trend =0.0002) and no change in the proportion undergoing CABG (36.1% to 34.7%; p trend =0.88). There was significant variability between participating hospitals in the use of PCI and CABG (range: 22%–100%; 0%–78%, respectively; P value <0.0001 for both). Patient-level, but not hospital-level, characteristics were statistically associated with the use of PCI versus CABG, including anatomic severity of the disease, early treatment of adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists at presentation, older age, female sex, and history of heart failure. Conclusions— Among patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease presenting with non–ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, only one third undergo CABG during the index admission. Furthermore, the use of PCI, but not CABG, increased modestly over the past 6 years.

We compared measures of ID coronary atherosclerosis between diabetic and non-diabetic patients enrolled in a prospective multinational IVUS registry. The region of interest was the most diseased 10 mm segment of a single coronary artery. Coronary plaque was quantified using greyscale IVUS and further classified by phenotype (ID-adaptive intimal thickening, ID-pathological intimal thickening, ID-TCFA, ID-fibroatheroma, or ID-fibrocalcific) using VH-IVUS. There was a non-significant trend for greater total plaque volume in diabetic (n=191) compared with non-diabetic (n=584) patients (94.8 vs. 88.1 mm 3 , p=0.36, adjusted for multiple comparisons). There was a greater proportion of ID-TCFA among diabetic patients (21.6 vs. 13.6%, p=0.01 after adjustment for multiple comparisons; p=0.08 following multivariable adjustment for age and clinical demographics), while differences in pathological intimal thickening, fibroatheroma and fibrocalcific plaque were not significant between groups. ID-TCFA was more common in the most diseased 10 mm segment of diabetic than in non-diabetic coronary arteries. Multivariable adjustment demonstrated age and possibly the presence of diabetes to be independent predictors of ID-TCFA.