Eshmuminov, Dilmurodjon

Abstract Background Perioperative morbidity and mortality remain a point of concern for the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure. Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) after the second step poses the most significant risk factor for futile outcome. Recovery of liver function after the first step of ALPPS is critically important to allow for sufficient liver function after this surgery. The APRI+ALBI score has been proposed as an easily assessable score to monitor liver function and its dynamic recovery. Aims We explored if the APRI+ALBI score was able to assess liver function recovery after the first step of ALPPS and allow for optimal timing of the 2nd step. Methods Based on the ALPPS registry, patients from 2012 to 2020 with available APRI+ALBI score were included. Postoperative outcomes (PHLF A – C, PHLF B + C, 90-day mortality and severe morbidity) were defined as per standard definitions. The APRI/ALBI score was monitored perioperatively. Results Overall, 464 patients from 16 international participating centers in the ALPPS registry were included. Clinically relevant PHLF (B + C) was observed in 7.5 % and of these 63 % of patients ultimately died due to liver failure. The APRI+ALBI score immediately increased after each surgical intervention and continuously decrease thereafter. Failure of the APRI+ALBI score to decrease until the 2nd step of ALPPS predicted PHLF B+C (p = 0.001; AUC 0.78). Particularly patients with high APRI+ALBI scores and short interstage intervals were at risk to develop PHLF B+C. Conclusion The APRI+ALBI score objectifies liver function recovery after the 1st step of ALPPS and failure to sufficiently decreased is associated with a higher risk for PHLF B+C. This might allow for optimized planning of the 2nd step of ALPPS to allow for sufficient liver function recovery to minimize the risk for PHLF B+C and associated futile outcome.

Background: In patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM), liver transplantation (LT) is an alternative to liver resection (LR), although the choice of therapy remains controversial. In this multicenter study, we aim to provide novel insight in this dispute. Methods: Following a systematic literature search, 15 large international centers were contacted to provide comprehensive data on their patients after LR or LT for NELM. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, while multivariable Cox regression served to identify factors influencing survival after either transplantation or resection. Inverse probability weighting and propensity score matching was used for analyses with balanced and equalized baseline characteristics. Results: Overall, 455 patients were analyzed, including 230 after LR and 225 after LT, with a median follow-up of 97 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 85–110 months]. Multivariable analysis revealed G3 grading as a negative prognostic factor for LR [hazard ratio (HR)=2.22, 95% CI: 1.04–4.77, P=0.040], while G2 grading (HR=2.52, 95% CI: 1.15–5.52, P=0.021) and LT outside Milan criteria (HR=2.40, 95% CI: 1.16–4.92, P=0.018) were negative prognostic factors in transplanted patients. Inverse probability-weighted multivariate analyses revealed a distinct survival benefit after LT. Matched patients presented a median overall survival (OS) of 197 months (95% CI: 143–not reached) and a 73% 5-year OS after LT, and 119 months (95% CI: 74–133 months) and a 52.8% 5-year OS after LR (HR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.3–0.9, P=0.022). However, the survival benefit after LT was lost if patients were transplanted outside Milan criteria. Conclusions: This multicentric study in patients with NELM demonstrates a survival benefit of LT over LR. This benefit depends on adherence to selection criteria, in particular low-grade tumor biology and Milan criteria, and must be balanced against potential risks of LT.