Back to Authors

Greer, Katarina B.

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5676-3464

Mayo Clinic

Case Western Reserve University

Citations 2

American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
Chey, William D. , Imdad, Aamer , Almario, Christopher V. , Bharucha, Adil E. , Diem, Susan J. , Greer, Katarina B. , Hanson, Brian, Harris, Lucinda A. , Ko, Cynthia W. , Patel, Amit , Shah, Eric D. , Sultan, Shahnaz , Patel, A , Imdad, Aamer , Shah, Eric D , Chang, Lin , Murad, M. Hassan , Lembo, Anthony

American Journal of Gastroenterology | May 19, 2023 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 936-954

10.14309/ajg.0000000000002227 Get It

INTRODUCTION: Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is a common disorder associated with significant impairment in quality of life. This clinical practice guideline, jointly developed by the American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology, aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of CIC in adults. METHODS: The American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that conducted systematic reviews of the following agents: fiber, osmotic laxatives (polyethylene glycol, magnesium oxide, lactulose), stimulant laxatives (bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, senna), secretagogues (lubiprostone, linaclotide, plecanatide), and serotonin type 4 agonist (prucalopride). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework to assess the certainty of evidence for each intervention. The Evidence to Decision framework was used to develop clinical recommendations based on the balance between the desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 10 recommendations for the pharmacological management of CIC in adults. Based on available evidence, the panel made strong recommendations for the use of polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulfate, linaclotide, plecanatide, and prucalopride for CIC in adults. Conditional recommendations were made for the use of fiber, lactulose, senna, magnesium oxide, and lubiprostone. DISCUSSION: This document provides a comprehensive outline of the various over-the-counter and prescription pharmacological agents available for the treatment of CIC. The guidelines are meant to provide a framework for approaching the management of CIC; clinical providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences as well as medication cost and availability. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to help guide future research opportunities and enhance the care of patients with chronic constipation.
ACG Clinical Guideline: Gastroparesis
Camilleri, Michael , Vaughn, Vida, Petrey, Jessica , Greer, Katarina B. , Kuo, Braden , Nguyen, Linda Anh B. , Yadlapati, Rena , Abell, Thomas L.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | August 4, 2022 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1197-1220

10.14309/ajg.0000000000001874 Get It

Gastroparesis is characterized by symptoms suggesting retention of food in the stomach with objective evidence of delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction in the gastric outflow. This condition is increasingly encountered in clinical practice. These guidelines summarize perspectives on the risk factors, diagnosis, and management of gastroparesis in adults (including dietary, pharmacological, device, and interventions directed at the pylorus), and they represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence for these guidelines was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation process. When the evidence was not appropriate for Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, we used expert consensus to develop key concept statements. These guidelines should be considered as preferred but are not the only approaches to these conditions.