ObjectiveIt is unclear whether isolated cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) affects cardiovascular risk. We estimated the cumulative incidence and mortality of cardiovascular diseases in a population‐based CLE cohort and compared the risk with a matched non‐CLE cohort.MethodsAll incident cases of CLE in Olmsted County, Minnesota, between 1965 and 2005 were followed until December 2013. The cumulative incidence of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs [including stroke and transient ischemic attack]), ischemic heart disease (IHD [including coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and angina pectoris]), heart failure, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was derived and compared to an age‐, sex‐, and calendar year–matched non‐CLE cohort using Cox models.ResultsThere were 155 patients with CLE (mean ± SD age at diagnosis 48 ± 16 years, 65% female, mean ± SD BMI 26.3 ± 7.1 kg/m2, 40% smokers, 9% with diabetes mellitus). During a median followup of 14.6 years, 41 CLE patients had cardiovascular events (15 patients with CVAs, 32 patients with IHD), with a 20‐year cumulative incidence of 31.6%. As compared to non‐CLE subjects, the risk of CVAs (smoking‐adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.97 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13–7.78]) and PAD (HR 2.06 [95% CI 0.99–4.32]) was increased in patients with CLE, but the risk of IHD was not increased (HR 0.94 [95% CI 0.57–1.54]). There was no increase in cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.68 [95% CI 0.76–3.75]). The magnitude of risk for any cardiovascular outcome was not significantly influenced by the extent of cutaneous involvement.ConclusionCLE may be associated with an increased risk of CVAs and PAD, but not IHD. Factors contributing to increased CVA risk in patients with CLE merit evaluation.
Randomized Comparison of Low-Dose Involved-Field Radiotherapy and No Radiotherapy for Children With Hodgkin’s Disease Who Achieve a Complete Response to Chemotherapy
PURPOSE: Current standard therapy for children and adolescents with Hodgkin’s disease includes combination chemotherapy and low-dose involved-field radiation (LD-IFRT). Because radiation may be associated with adverse late effects, the Children’s Cancer Group (CCG) investigated whether radiation could be omitted in patients achieving a complete response to initial chemotherapy without jeopardizing the excellent outcome obtained with combined-modality therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1998, 829 eligible patients were enrolled onto CCG 5942. A total of 501 patients who achieved an initial complete response after risk-adapted combination chemotherapy were randomized to receive LD-IFRT or no further treatment. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival were assessed from the date of study entry or the date of randomization, as appropriate. RESULTS: The projected 3-year EFS from study entry for the entire cohort was 87% ± 1.2%. Among patients who achieved a complete response to initial chemotherapy, 92% ± 1.9% of those randomized to receive LD-IFRT were alive and disease free 3 years after randomization, versus 87% ± 2.2% for patients randomized to receive no further therapy (stratified log-rank test; P = .057). With an “as-treated” analysis, 3-year EFS after randomization for the radiation cohort was 93% ± 1.7% versus 85% ± 2.3% for patients receiving no further therapy (stratified log-rank test; P = .0024). Three-year survival estimates for patients treated with and without LD-IFRT were 98% ± 1.1% for patients who received radiation and 99% ± 0.5% for patients who did not receive radiation. CONCLUSION: LD-IFRT after an initial complete response to risk-adapted chemotherapy improved EFS. At this time, there is no survival advantage for LD-IFRT, but follow-up remains short.