Shao, Belinda

OBJECTIVE The global need for neurosurgical care is significant and often unmet. Building partnerships between high-income countries (HICs) and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) can help bridge the gap. Six features of sustainable global surgical partnerships have been identified; however, their application in neurosurgery has not been studied. The authors analyzed how the 6 pillars of sustainability are applied to neurosurgical partnerships established by the Neurosurgery Outreach Foundation (NOF) with hospitals in LMICs in Asia. METHODS NOF is an all-volunteer, nonprofit US foundation with the mission to advance neurosurgical care in underserved communities through education, service, and support. The authors examined the NOF programs and identified the characteristics associated with the 6 pillars of sustainability, which are community engagement, multidisciplinary collaboration, education and training, outcome measurement, multisource funding, and bilateral authorship. The authors discuss how these pillars contribute to the establishment of sustainable partnerships. RESULTS From 2010 to 2024, NOF has established partnerships at 4 sites: Cebu, Manila, and Davao, the Philippines; and Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Partnerships were established with tertiary or quaternary government hospitals to develop neurosurgical programs tailored to the needs of each site and remained sustained and active. Educational surgical missions were in-person outreach activities conducted annually or biennially and were supplemented with online or remote collaboration. The 5 pillars of sustainable partnerships present at all sites include community engagement, multidisciplinary collaboration, education and training, outcome measurement, and multisource funding. The sixth pillar, bilateral authorship, was present at University of the Philippines–Philippine General Hospital in Manila. CONCLUSIONS Using the 6 pillars of sustainable global partnerships, neurosurgical partnerships can be developed and maintained by all-volunteer nonprofit organizations such as NOF. Incorporating these pillars during the planning and executing of global neurosurgical partnerships are essential for long-term success.

OBJECTIVE Complex tethered spinal cord (cTSC) release in children is often complicated by surgical site infection (SSI). Children undergoing this surgery share many similarities with patients undergoing correction for neuromuscular scoliosis, where high rates of gram-negative and polymicrobial infections have been reported. Similar organisms isolated from SSIs after cTSC release were recently demonstrated in a single-center pilot study. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if these findings are reproducible across a larger, multicenter study. METHODS A multicenter, retrospective chart review including 7 centers was conducted to identify all cases of SSI following cTSC release during a 10-year study period from 2007 to 2017. Demographic information along with specific microbial culture data and antibiotic sensitivities for each cultured organism were collected. RESULTS A total of 44 SSIs were identified from a total of 655 cases, with 78 individual organisms isolated. There was an overall SSI rate of 6.7%, with 43% polymicrobial and 66% containing at least one gram-negative organism. Half of SSIs included an organism that was resistant to cefazolin, whereas only 32% of SSIs were completely susceptible to cefazolin. CONCLUSIONS In this study, gram-negative and polymicrobial infections were responsible for the majority of SSIs following cTSC surgery, with approximately half resistant to cefazolin. Broader gram-negative antibiotic prophylaxis should be considered for this patient population.