Heilberger, Justin

6057 Background: The incidence rate of human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV(+)OPSCC) has persistently increased over the past decade and is anticipated to rise further over the next decade. Cost effective, accurate, and less invasive screening options for HPV(+)OPSCC have remained stagnant leading to the interrogation of circulating tumor DNA in liquid biopsies such as plasma. We hypothesized that candidate methylated DNA markers (MDMs), previously described by our group, would be present in the plasma of patients with HPV(+)OPSCC and absent in controls. Methods: HPV(+)OPSCC cases were enrolled from a high-volume referral practice. Cancer-free control patients were identified from the surrounding 7-county catchment area and frequency matched to cases by age and alcohol use. cfDNA was extracted from 4 mL of plasma and bisulfite converted prior to Target Enrichment Long-probe Quantitative Amplified Signal assays for 15 MDMs. Strand counts for individual MDMs were normalized to a methylated genomic reference marker. An MDM score was derived via random forest modeling of the 15 MDMs. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) for discriminating cases from controls was evaluated for individual markers and for the MDM score. The sensitivity of the MDM score at 95% specificity was also evaluated. Results: The study consisted of 96 HPV(+)OPSCC and 100 cancer-free controls. The study population was predominately white (95%) with a median age of 61 yrs (IQR: 52-69 yrs). Eighty-nine percent of the cases were male with cancers affecting either the tonsil in 50 (52%) or base of the tongue in 46 (48%) patients; by design 50% of controls were male. Stage I:II:III:IV disease was present in 66%:22%:9%:3% of the cases. The median (IQR) AUC across the 15 MDMs was 0.83 (0.82-0.85) overall: 0.78 (0.77-0.83) for stage I disease and 0.92 (0.91-0.93) for stage II-IV disease. The MDM score for the combined panel of 15 MDMs achieved a cross-validated AUC of 0.93 (CI: 0.89-0.97) overall: 0.90 (CI: 0.84-0.96) for stage I disease and 0.98 (CI: 0.97-1.00) for stage II-IV disease. At 95% specificity, the cross-validated sensitivity of the MDM score for HPV(+)OPSCC was 80% (CI: 71-87%) overall: 73% (CI: 60-83%) for stage I disease and 94% (CI: 78-99%) for stage II-IV disease. Conclusions: We validated a set of previously discovered MDM markers in HPV(+)OPSCC in a robust case control cohort using plasma. The MDMs were detected in both early and late-stage disease. Additional prospective studies in larger intended use cohorts are needed to validate our results for clinical use.

Plasma-based MDMs may offer a cost-effective alternative to imaging for melanoma detection. Early results show 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity against cancer-free controls. Further study needed. #MelanomaResearch #EarlyDetection

Abstract Purpose: Many cancer deaths could be avoided, and survival could be improved with detection of cancer at an earlier stage. Screening programs for breast, colon, and cervical cancer as well as the NLST trial for lung cancer screening demonstrated significant improvement in survival rates with screening. However, for 2021, the American Cancer Society estimates these screened cancers represent less than ~40% of cancer incidence and deaths. The remainder of cancer deaths occur because of tumors in unscreened organs and, therefore, a multicancer test that detects cancer in these organs can increase survival rates. By focusing on detection of unscreened cancers, this type of multicancer test would be complementary to current screening procedures. Here we describe the validation of a combined panel of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) and proteins for multicancer detection through testing an independent set of case/control samples. Experimental Procedures: In this study, we further evaluate the performance of our previously identified panel of 15 MDMs and 5 proteins for multicancer detection (Allawi et al., 2021 AACR Annual Meeting) by testing 315 controls and 160 cases encompassing 6 cancer types (liver, esophageal, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, and stomach). All samples used in the study were case-control collections with smoking status, age, and gender matching between cases and asymptomatic controls. Testing was performed in blinded fashion using multiplex PCR followed by LQAS (Long probe Quantitative Amplified Signal) assay on bisulfite converted DNA extracted from 3 mL of plasma collected in LB Gard® blood tubes. Protein concentrations were determined from paired serum aliquots and combined with MDMs for a multi-analyte analysis. The subjects were divided into training and validation with equal representation of cancer type, staging, gender, and age. Two thirds of the cases and controls were used to train with a logistic prediction algorithm, and the remaining 1/3 were used to validate the model. Results: Using stepwise logistic regression, a training model of MDMs and protein markers resulted in an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.97 and cancer sensitivity of 89% at 98% specificity. The same model predicted the validation set with an AUC of 0.96 and cancer sensitivity of 85% at a specificity of 95%. Applying the algorithm to the combined training and validation sets resulted in sensitivities and specificities of 88% and 97%, respectively. The sensitivities per cancer type ranged from 73% for pancreatic cancer to 97% for lung cancer. Conclusion and Next Steps: This study demonstrates the performance of our MDMs and protein markers and their importance as components in our multi-omics strategy for multicancer detection. The next steps would be to expand the testing to include additional cancer types and combine with NGS-based methods to improve performance and optimize workflow. Citation Format: Hatim T. Allawi, Slava Katerov, Abram Vaccaro, Harrison L. Fleming, Debra E. Rugowski, Brittany Otto, Justin Heilberger, Jillian Cassel, Jacquelyn Hennek, William Taylor, Graham Lidgard. Validation of a panel of methylated DNA and protein markers for multi-cancer detection in plasma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 631.

9567 Background: Cutaneous melanoma surveillance is important to identify low-volume systemic disease, but imaging is costly and poorly accessible to patients; frequent skin checks lack sensitivity and specificity. We aimed to establish clinical feasibility of a liquid biopsy blood test, which quantifies validated, melanoma-specific, methylated DNA markers (MDMs), previously discovered, and reported by our team, using tissue extracted DNA. Methods: We prospectively collected blood from adult patients with histologically confirmed melanoma metastases and no other internal malignancies (within 5-years) who underwent surveillance by FDG-PET/CT (N = 88). Blood from age- and sex balanced cancer-free controls (N = 100) were compared. From PET/CT, we extracted the number of organs involved, SUV-max, and largest tumor diameter. Unequivocal metastasis was defined as SUV ≥ 4 and largest diameter > 5 mm. Because PET/CT is inadequate for the screening of brain metastases, we excluded the brain from the analysis. MDMs ( chr11.149, HOXA9, chr20.210, FLJ22536, CLIC5, SIX4, chr7.155, chr17.730, chr1.110) were assayed using target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays, normalized to B3GALT6, in blinded fashion. Using a logistic regression approach and nine candidate MDMs, we calculated the sensitivity for detecting patients with metastasis on PET/CT at 100% specificity. Results: 52/88 (59%) of melanoma patients showed evidence of metastasis on PET/CT at the time of blood draw. At 100% specificity, a panel of 4 MDMs ( HOXA9, chr20.210, chr17.730, chr1.110) yielded a sensitivity of 86.5% (45/52 cases) vs. 100 cancer-free controls. When applying this model to the 36 PET/CT-negative patients, specificity was as high as 97.2% (35/36 cases) while maintaining a sensitivity of 86.5% (one patient with a positive test result had a complete metabolic response to binimetinib / encorafenib prior to negative PET/CT). For patients with ≥ 2 organs involved by metastasis, sensitivity was 100% (29/29 cases). False-negative cases had metastasis in single organs and were characterized by minimal tumor burden and oral corticosteroid use. One false-negative patient had localized stage III disease without known primary melanoma. Conclusions: Plasma MDM levels appear highly concordant with FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma. A liquid biopsy approach has potential to lower cost and improve patient access to surveillance. Additional prospective studies in larger intended use cohorts are needed to validate our results.