Back to Authors

Forde, Patrick M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-6344

Mayo Clinic

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center

Citations 4

Guide to Understanding and Supporting International Medical Graduates in Hematology/Oncology by the ASCO International Medical Graduates Community of Practice
Dizman, Nazlı , Bakouny, Ziad , Haykal, Tarek , Riaño, Ivy , Desai, Aakash , Butt, Ayesha , Basu, Arnab , Zhao, Dan , Saad, Eddy , Saliby, Renée Maria , Gosain, Rohit , Gosain, Rahul , Ardeshir, Fatemeh , Matt-Amaral, Laurie , Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Marshall, Ariela L. , Murphy, Martina, Lopes, Gilberto , Lee, Alfred Ian , Deng, Lei , Matt-Amaral, Laurie , Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Manochakian, Rami , Marshall, Ariela , Forde, Patrick , Subbiah, Vivek , Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana , Owonikoko, Taofeek Kunle , Lopes, Gilberto , Aggarwal, Charu , Lee, Alfred I , Choueiri, Toni K , Desai, Aakash P , Bakouny, Ziad , Basu, Arnab , Butt, Ayesha , Zhao, Dan , Saad, Eddy , Deng, Lei , Manochakian, Rami , Forde, Patrick M. , Subbiah, Vivek , Chávez‐MacGregor, Mariana , Aggarwal, Charu , Choueiri, Toni K.

JCO Oncology Practice | October 7, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 292-299

10.1200/op-24-00565 Get It

PURPOSE International medical graduates (IMGs) are an essential component of the oncology workforce in the United States, comprising a third of all practicing oncologists and almost half of hematology/oncology fellows. In this article, we discuss the contributions of IMGs in the US oncology workforce, review unique challenges faced by IMGs, and propose potential solutions to overcome these challenges. METHODS ASCO's IMG Community of Practice was established with the mission to connect, mentor, guide, raise awareness, and overcome the challenges unique to IMGs interested in pursuing medical oncology in the United States. The content of this article is based on discussions at the IMG Community of Practice meetings at ASCO's 2023 and 2024 Annual Meetings. RESULTS IMGs bring an inherent diversity of thought and experience to the oncology workforce. They provide high-quality, culture- and language-concordant care to a diverse population of patients with cancer. However, IMGs in oncology face significant hardships throughout their careers, including visa-related restrictions, psychosocial and cultural struggles, as well as differential treatment while applying for residency and fellowship training, and early career positions. Greater awareness of these challenges among the members of the hematology/oncology community, along with institutional and individual efforts to support IMGs, is warranted. CONCLUSION We encourage oncology professionals and institutions to join our efforts in recognizing the unique paths of IMGs and providing support and advocacy to maximize the potential of IMGs in the US oncology workforce.
Phase 2 randomized trial of neoadjuvant or palliative chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy for peritoneal mesothelioma (Alliance A092001).
Goodrich, Austin W. , Foster, Nathan R. , Savvides, Panos, Feldman, Diane, Cao, Liang, Salvatore, Mary , Roden, Anja C. , Powell, Steven , Shergill, Ardaman , Mansfield, Aaron S. , Savvides, Panos, Villaruz, Liza Cosca , Forde, Patrick M. , Raghav, Kanwal , Romesser, Paul B. , Feldman, Diane, Münster, Pamela N. , Schwartz, Gary K. , Grotz, Travis E.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 4, 2023 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: TPS8603-TPS8603

10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.tps8603 Get It

TPS8603 Background: Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare and poorly studied disease with few treatment options. For patients (pts) who are not surgical candidates, treatment recommendations for systemic therapy have been extrapolated from clinical trials for pleural mesothelioma that commonly exclude pts with peritoneal mesothelioma. Recently, the combination of the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab and the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab received FDA-approval for the frontline treatment of non-resectable pleural mesothelioma. Additionally, a prospective, non-randomized phase 2 trial demonstrated activity with combined PD-L1 (atezolizumab) and VEGF (bevacizumab) blockade in peritoneal mesothelioma. In parallel, encouraging activity with combined chemo-immunotherapy has been reported in pleural mesothelioma. Given the benefits observed with immunotherapy, and the potential to improve upon those with chemotherapy and VEGF inhibition, we seek to determine whether the addition of the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab improves outcomes with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in pts with newly diagnosed peritoneal mesothelioma. Methods: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A092001 is a prospective, randomized phase 2 clinical trial. All pts with newly diagnosed peritoneal mesothelioma will be randomized 1:1 using a dynamic allocation Pocock-Simon procedure to receive carboplatin, pemetrexed and bevacizumab, with or without atezolizumab, every 21 days for four cycles. Patients who are eligible to proceed with surgery after four cycles of therapy will then do so. Pts who are not eligible to proceed with surgery may receive maintenance bevacizumab and atezolizumab, or second-line atezolizumab with bevacizumab until progression of disease or toxicity. The primary objective is to determine if frontline treatment with carboplatin, pemetrexed, bevacizumab and atezolizumab results in a superior best response rate (RR) to carboplatin, pemetrexed and bevacizumab as determined by RECIST. With 31 eligible pts per arm (62 eligible total), this randomized design has 80% power to detect an improvement in the RR from 20% to 45%, with a 1-sided significance level of 0.10 where an interim futility analysis will be conducted after 32 pts are enrolled. Stratification factors include eligibility for cytoreductive surgery at diagnosis and histologic subtype. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse events. As integrated biomarkers, we will determine if soluble mesothelin-related peptides and megakaryocyte potentiating factor correlate with responses. This trial was recently approved by the National Cancer Institute Central IRB and is activating at sites across the country. Clinical trial information: NCT05001880 .
Phase 2 randomized trial of neoadjuvant or palliative chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy for peritoneal mesothelioma (Alliance A092001).
Goodrich, Austin W. , Foster, Nathan R. , Ernani, Vinicius , Garbacz, Krista, Cao, Liang, Salvatore, Mary , Roden, Anja C. , Powell, Steven , Shergill, Ardaman , Mansfield, Aaron S. , Forde, Patrick M. , Villaruz, Liza Cosca , Raghav, Kanwal , Romesser, Paul B. , Münster, Pamela N. , Schwartz, Gary K. , Grotz, Travis E.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 6, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: TPS8598-TPS8598

10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps8598 Get It

TPS8598 Background: Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare and poorly studied disease with few treatment options. For patients who are not surgical candidates, treatment recommendations for systemic therapy have been extrapolated from clinical trials for pleural mesothelioma that commonly exclude patients with peritoneal mesothelioma. Recently, the combination of the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab and the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab received FDA-approval for the frontline treatment of non-resectable pleural mesothelioma. Additionally, a prospective, non-randomized phase 2 trial demonstrated activity with combined PD-L1 (atezolizumab) and VEGF (bevacizumab) blockade in peritoneal mesothelioma. In parallel, encouraging activity with combined chemo-immunotherapy has been reported in pleural mesothelioma. Given the benefits observed with immunotherapy, and the potential to improve upon those with chemotherapy and VEGF inhibition, we seek to determine whether the addition of the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab improves outcomes with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed peritoneal mesothelioma. Methods: A092001 is a prospective, randomized phase 2 clinical trial. All patients with newly diagnosed peritoneal mesothelioma will be randomized 1:1 using a dynamic allocation Pocock-Simon procedure to receive carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab, with or without atezolizumab, every 21 days for four cycles. Patients who are eligible to proceed with surgery after four cycles of therapy will then do so. Patients who are not eligible to proceed with surgery may receive maintenance bevacizumab and atezolizumab, or second-line atezolizumab with bevacizumab until progression of disease or toxicity. The primary objective is to determine whether frontline treatment with carboplatin, pemetrexed, bevacizumab and atezolizumab results in a superior best response rate (RR) to carboplatin, pemetrexed and bevacizumab as determined by RECIST. With 31 eligible patients per arm (62 eligible total), this randomized design has 80% power to detect an improvement in the RR from 20% to 45%, with a 1-sided significance level of 0.10 where an interim futility analysis will be conducted after 32 patients are enrolled. As stratification factors we have included eligibility for cytoreductive surgery at diagnosis, and histologic subtype. Secondary endpoints include assessment of progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. As integrated biomarkers, we will determine if soluble mesothelin-related peptides and megakaryocyte potentiating factor correlate with responses. This trial was recently approved by the National Cancer Institute Central IRB and is activating at sites across the country. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882. Clinical trial information: NCT05001880.
Mogamulizumab in Combination with Nivolumab in a Phase I/II Study of Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Hong, David S. , Rixe, Olivier, Chiu, Vi K., Forde, Patrick M., Dragovich, Tomislav, Lou, Yanyan , Nayak-Kapoor, Asha , Leidner, Rom , Atkins, James N., Collaku, Agron , Fox, Floyd E., Marshall, Margaret A. , Forde, Patrick M. , Olszanski, Anthony J , Hong, David S , Forde, Patrick , Rixe, Olivier, Chiu, Vi K., Dragovich, Tomislav, Lou, Yanyan , Nayak-Kapoor, Asha , Leidner, Rom , Atkins, James N., Collaku, Agron , Fox, Floyd E., Marshall, Margaret A.

Clinical Cancer Research | November 9, 2021 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 479-488

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2781 Get It

Abstract Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacodynamic profile of mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody targeting effector regulatory T cells (Treg) in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Patients and Methods: This was a multicenter, dose-finding (phase I), and dose expansion (phase II) study (NCT02705105) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. There were no dose-limiting toxicities in phase I with mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg every week for cycle 1 followed by 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks intravenously, and cohort expansion occurred at this dose level. Results: All 114 patients treated with mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 240 mg in phases I (n = 4) and II (n = 110) were assessed for safety and efficacy. Mogamulizumab plus nivolumab showed acceptable safety and tolerability. Objective response rate was 10.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6–17.7; 3 complete and 9 partial responses]. Disease control rate was 36.8%. Median duration of response was 14.4 months. Median progression-free survival was 2.6 (95% CI, 2.3–3.1) months, and median overall survival was 9.5 (95% CI, 5.9–13.5) months. Conclusions: Combination of mogamulizumab with nivolumab for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors did not result in enhanced efficacy. Tolerability of mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 240 mg was acceptable.