Lazure, Patrice

Abstract Background and Aims Non‐invasive tests (NITs) are underutilized for diagnosis and risk stratification in metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), despite good accuracy. This study aimed to identify challenges and barriers to the use of NITs in clinical practice. Methods We conducted a qualitative exploratory study in Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and United States. Phase 1 participants (primary care physicians, hepatologists, diabetologists, researchers, healthcare administrators, payers and patient advocates; n = 29) were interviewed. Phase 2 participants (experts in MASLD; n = 8) took part in a group discussion to validate and expand on Phase 1 findings. Finally, we triangulated perspectives in a hybrid deductive/inductive thematic analysis. Results Four themes hindering the use of NITs emerged: (1) limited knowledge and awareness; (2) unclear referral pathways for patients affected by liver conditions; (3) uncertainty over the value of NITs in monitoring and managing liver diseases; and (4) challenges justifying system‐level reimbursement. Through these themes, participants perceived a stigma associated with liver diseases, and primary care physicians generally lacked awareness, adequate knowledge and skills to use recommended NITs. We identified uncertainties over the results of NITs, specifically to guide lifestyle intervention or to identify patients that should be referred to a specialist. Participants indicated an ongoing need for research and development to improve the prognostic value of NITs and communicating their cost‐effectiveness to payers. Conclusions This qualitative study suggests that use of NITs for MASLD is limited due to several individual and system‐level barriers. Multi‐level interventions are likely required to address these barriers.

e13054 Background: Combination therapy with cyclin dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i: palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib) and endocrine therapy (ET) has markedly improved treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2-negative (-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) worldwide.However, data is limited on why patients may discontinue CDK4/6i based therapy and how healthcare providers (HCPs) see their role in educating patients (Px) about side effects and supporting compliance. Objective: This study identifies reasons for suboptimal compliance and early discontinuation of CDK4/6i in US HR+ HER2- MBC Px, with a focus on HCPs and Px educational needs related to on-treatment monitoring, side effects and symptom management. Methods: A sequential mixed-methods design was used; 45-minute phone interviews (n=25) informed the development of an online survey (n=193). Both phases included HCPs comprising medical oncologists (ONCs), oncology registered nurses (RNs), nurse practitioners, and physician assistants (NPs/PAs) in community-based settings. Results: Identified areas of improvement for HCPs included: suboptimal competencies were identified: educating Px adequately regarding potential side effects and engaging them to monitor, report, and address them. Among HCPs surveyed, 26%-48% reported suboptimal knowledge of side effects of specific CDK4/6i [Table]. Interviewees noted that educating Px and setting expectations on potential side effects was critical, but 52% of ONCs reported suboptimal skill doing so. A majority of HCPs (68%-91%) expect Px to be able to report all side effects, with half of ONCs considering compliance with medication entirely Pxs’ responsibility, compared with NPs/PAs and RNs at 16-17%. Conclusions: This study identified areas where HCPs can improve their ability to counsel Px and address concerns that may influence a Px’s decision to prematurely discontinue therapy and should be used to inform future professional development initiatives. [Table: see text]