Nemes, Karolina

AbstractPurposeRadiotherapy (RT) is associated with improved survival in atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT); however, optimal RT delivery is unknown. A meta‐analysis was conducted for disseminated (M+) ATRT receiving focal or craniospinal radiation (CSI).MethodsAfter abstract screening, 25 studies (1995–2020) contained necessary patient, disease, and radiation treatment information (N = 96). All abstract, full text, and data capture were independently double‐reviewed. The corresponding author was contacted for cases of insufficient information. Response to pre‐radiation chemotherapy (N = 57) was categorized as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). Univariate and multivariate statistics were performed to investigate survival correlation. Patients with M4 disease were excluded.ResultsThe 2‐ and 4‐year overall survival (OS) was 63.8% and 45.7%, respectively, with a median follow‐up of 2 years (range 0.3–13.5). The median age was 2 years (range 0.2–19.5), and 96% received chemotherapy. On univariate analysis, gross total resection (GTR, p = .0007), pre‐radiation chemotherapy response (p < .001), and high‐dose chemotherapy with stem cell recuse (HDSCT, p = .002) correlated with survival. On multivariate analysis, pre‐radiation chemotherapy response (p = .02) and GTR (p = .012) retained survival significance as compared to a trend for HDSCT (p = .072). Comparisons of focal RT (vs. CSI) and greater than or equal to 5400 cGy primary dose were nonsignificant. Following CR or PR, a statistical trend favored focal radiation (p = .089) over CSI.ConclusionChemotherapy response prior to RT and GTR correlated with improved survival on multivariate analysis for ATRT M+ receiving RT. No benefit was observed for CSI compared to focal RT among all patients and following favorable chemotherapy response, inviting further study of focal RT for ATRT M+.

Abstract Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is a malignant central nervous system tumor predominantly affecting infants. Mutations of SMARCB1 or (rarely) SMARCA4 causing loss of nuclear SMARCB1 or SMARCA4 protein expression are characteristic features, but further recurrent genetic alterations are lacking. Most AT/RTs occur de novo, but secondary AT/RTs arising in other central nervous system tumors have been reported. Malignant gliomas, IDH-wildtype, arising in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome typically show somatic mutations of TP53 as well as complex copy number alterations, but little is known about loss of SMARCB1 or SMARCA4 protein expression in this context. Here we report two children, in whom malignant supratentorial brain tumors with SMARCB1-deficiency, complex copy number alterations and somatic TP53 mutations lead to the discovery of pathogenic/likely pathogenic TP53 variants in the germ line. Screening of the molecularneuropathology.org data set for cases with similar genetic and epigenetic alterations yielded another case with SMARCA4-deficiency in a young adult with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. In conclusion, SMARCB1- or SMARCA4-deficient malignant brain tumors with complex copy number alterations and somatic TP53 mutations in children and young adults may represent the first clinical manifestation of Li-Fraumeni syndrome and should prompt genetic counseling and investigation for TP53 germline status.