Kaymakci, Mahmut

Objective Gain‐of‐function variants in IDH1 and IDH2 are enriched among individuals with coexisting myeloid neoplasms and autoimmune diseases. However, the association between IDH1 / IDH2 variants and rheumatic diseases independent of hematologic neoplasms remains unclear. We investigated the association between rare gain‐of‐function and loss‐of‐function genetic variants in IDH1 and IDH2 and immune‐mediated rheumatic diseases. Methods Individuals with gain‐of‐function and loss‐of‐function variants in IDH1/IDH2 were identified by whole genome sequencing in the UK Biobank and the All of Us Research Program. These individuals were matched 1:10 to controls without IDH1 or IDH2 variants by age, sex, and ancestry. The frequency of immune‐mediated rheumatic diseases in the presence and absence of IDH1/IDH2 variants was compared using chi‐square or Fisher exact tests. Results Fifty‐five individuals with IDH1 or IDH2 gain‐of‐function variants without pre‐existing hematologic neoplasms were identified in the UK Biobank. These individuals had a significantly higher frequency of incident immune‐mediated rheumatic diseases compared to matched controls (11 of 55 [20%] vs 20 of 550 [4%], odds ratio [OR] = 6.6, P = 2.7 × 10 −5 ), mainly polymyalgia rheumatica (6 of 11) and rheumatoid arthritis (5 of 11). Replication in the All of Us cohort identified 65 individuals with gain‐of‐function variants and confirmed an increased odds of incident immune‐mediated rheumatic diseases compared to controls (OR = 7.7, P < 5 × 10 −4 ), predominantly rheumatoid arthritis. There was no association between loss‐of‐function variants in IDH1/IDH2 and immune‐mediated rheumatic diseases in either cohort. Conclusion Rare gain‐of‐function variants in IDH1 / IDH2 are associated with increased risk of immune‐mediated rheumatic diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. image

Abstract Objectives To examine the clinicopathologic features of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) who had thoracic aorta repair surgery. Findings were compared with those of a cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) requiring thoracic aorta repair. Methods All patients evaluated at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, with Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for thoracic aorta repair surgery between 2000–2021 were identified. All patients were screened for prior PMR diagnosis. Patients with PMR and no signs of GCA were categorized as clinically isolated PMR. The medical records of all patients were manually reviewed, and pathologists re-examined all the aortic tissues. Results Of the 4621 patients with at least one CPT code for thoracic aorta repair surgery, 43 patients were diagnosed with clinically isolated PMR before the surgery. Detailed histopathological examination of the aortic tissues revealed active inflammation in 30/43 (70%) patients after a median (IQR) of 10.0 (4.7–13.3) years from the PMR diagnosis. When compared with aortic tissue from patients with a prior diagnosis of GCA, the aorta of patients with PMR had more severe inflammation (Grade 3: 15/30 [50%] vs 5/34 [15%], P = 0.002). Patients with PMR and thoracic aorta repair may experience a 40% increased risk of mortality compared with the general population, but this did not reach statistical significance (standardized mortality ratio: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.91–2.07). Conclusions Some patients with PMR have subclinical aortic inflammation that is detectable many years after initial diagnosis and may contribute to the development of aortic aneurysm.

Objective To evaluate the incidence and outcomes of large artery (LA) involvement among patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and to compare LA involvement to non-GCA patients. Methods The study included Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA residents with incident GCA between 1950 and 2016 with follow-up through 31 December 2020, death or migration. A population-based age-matched/sex-matched comparator cohort without GCA was assembled. LA involvement included aortic aneurysm, dissection, stenosis in the aorta or its main branches diagnosed within 1 year prior to GCA or anytime afterwards. Cumulative incidence of LA involvement was estimated; Cox models were used. Results The GCA cohort included 289 patients (77% females, 81% temporal artery biopsy positive), 106 with LA involvement. Reported cumulative incidences of LA involvement in GCA at 15 years were 14.8%, 30.2% and 49.2% for 1950–1974, 1975–1999 and 2000–2016, respectively (HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.67 to 7.27 for 2000–2016 vs 1950–1974). GCA patients had higher risk for LA involvement compared with non-GCA (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.83 to 5.68 adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities). Thoracic aortic aneurysms were increased in GCA versus non GCA (HR 13.46, 95% CI 1.78 to 101.98) but not abdominal (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.33 to 3.55). All-cause mortality in GCA patients improved over time (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.93 in 2000–2016 vs 1950–1974) but remained significantly elevated in those with LA involvement (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.56). Conclusions LA involvement in GCA has increased over time. Patients with GCA have higher incidences of LA involvement compared with non-GCA including thoracic but not abdominal aneurysms. Mortality is increased in patients with GCA and LA involvement highlighting the need for continued surveillance.

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) are large-vessel vasculitides affecting the aorta and its branches. Arterial damage from these diseases may result in ischemic complications, aneurysms, and dissections. Despite their similarities, the management of GCA and TAK differs. Glucocorticoids are used frequently but relapses are common, and glucocorticoid toxicity contributes to significant morbidity. Conventional immunosuppressive therapies can be beneficial in TAK, though their role in the management of GCA remains unclear. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors improve remission rates and appear to limit vascular damage in TAK; these agents are not beneficial in GCA. Tocilizumab is the first biologic glucocorticoid-sparing agent approved for use in GCA and also appears to be effective in TAK. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of both conditions and the availability of targeted therapies hold much promise for future management.

Abstract Objectives ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is currently categorized under the small vessel vasculitides. There is limited knowledge about large vessel involvement in AAV (L-AAV), mainly described in case reports and small series. L-AAV can involve temporal arteries (TA-AAV), aorta (A-AAV), and periaortic soft tissue (PA-AAV). We sought to characterize the features of patients with L-AAV. Methods Patients older than 18 years at diagnosis of TA-AAV, A-AAV and PA-AAV seen at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2021 were identified through a proprietary medical text search algorithm. Patients were included if diagnosed with L-AAV, fulfilled 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for GPA, MPA or EGPA, had positive ANCA test results, and had more than one outpatient or inpatient visit. Results The study cohort consists of 36 patients with L-AAV. Of those, 23 had p-ANCA and/or MPO-ANCA, and 13 had c-ANCA and/or PR3-ANCA. Mean (s.d.) age at AAV diagnosis was 63.4 (12.79) years; 20 (56%) were male. Seventeen patients had TA-AAV, 10 had A-AAV and 9 had PA-AAV. Most patients (n = 25, 69%) were diagnosed with large vessel vasculitis and AAV within a 1-year timespan. Twenty-five (69%) patients had histopathological confirmation of AAV diagnosis in a location other than temporal artery, aorta or periaortic soft tissue. Glucocorticoids (36/36), rituximab (19/36) and methotrexate (18/36) were the most frequent treatments. Conclusion This is the largest single-centre cohort of patients with L-AAV to date. AAV can involve large arteries, albeit infrequent. AAV-targeted therapy should be considered in patients with L-AAV.