Mehta, Neev

The journal retracts the article, “Effect Comparison of E-Cigarette and Traditional Smoking and Association with Stroke—A Cross-Sectional Study of NHANES” [...]

Liver transplant (LT) has become increasingly common among reproductive-aged women. The effect of the type of liver donor, either a living donor LT (LDLT) or a deceased donor LT, on pregnancy outcomes is unknown. As such, we aim to review the available literature and assess obstetric, pregnancy, or delivery outcomes in LDLT. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Random-effect meta-regression assessed the association between the percentage of women who underwent LDLT (independent variable) and the proportion of outcomes. Meta-regression results were expressed as a regression coefficient, which transforms the proportion of outcomes of interest associated with a 1% increase in the percentage of LDLT patients. A value of 0 denotes no relationship between the outcomes and LDLT. A total of 6 articles (438 patients) were included, with a total of 806 pregnancies. Eighty-eight (20.09%) patients underwent LDLT. None of the studies segregated the data based on the type of donor LT. The median time from LT to pregnancy was 4.86 (4.62–5.03) years. Twelve (1.5%) stillbirths were reported. LDLT was statistically significantly associated with a higher rate of stillbirths (coefficient 0.002, p < 0.001; I2 0%). The type of donor LT was not associated with an increased risk of other obstetric, pregnancy, or delivery complications. This is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of the type of donor LT on pregnancy outcomes. This study highlights the lack of robust literature addressing this important topic. The results suggest that pregnancy outcomes after LDLT and deceased donor LT are comparable. Despite LDLT being statistically significantly associated with a higher rate of stillbirths, the association is weak and is unlikely to be clinically significant.

Introduction: Tobacco use is a known risk factor for stroke and other cardiovascular diseases. However, the relationship between e-cigarette smoking and stroke is largely unknown. Hypothesis: This study aims to assess the effect of e-cigarettes among people who have had a history of stroke. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed using the NHANES database from 2015 to 2018 in the US population. We identified participants 18 or older with a history of stroke and their smoking habits (e-cigarette, traditional, and dual smoking). The chi-square test, unpaired t-test, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association of e-cigarette consumption among the stroke population. Results: Out of a total of 266,058 respondents, 79,825 were smokers [E-cigarette: 7,756 (9.72%); Traditional: 48,625(60.91%), Dual smokers: 23,444 (29.37%)] Overall prevalence of stroke was 5.41% (n=4194) amongst various types of smokers. Amongst females with stroke, the prevalence of e-cigarette use was higher compared to traditional smoking. (36.36% vs 33.91%; p<0.001) Mexican Americans (21.21% vs. 6.02%) and other Hispanics (24.24% vs. 7.70%) had a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use than traditional smoking. (p<0.001) E-cigarette smokers were having an early onset of stroke in comparison with dual and traditional smokers. (Median age in years: 48 vs. 50 vs. 59, respectively; p<0.001). Stroke was more prevalent amongst traditional smokers compared to e-cigarette and dual smokers (6.75% vs. 1.09% vs. 3.72% p<0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the odds of having a history of stroke were higher amongst e-cigarettes in comparison with traditional smokers. (aOR:1.15; 95%CI: 1.15-1.16; p<0.001). Conclusion: Although stroke was more prevalent in traditional smokers, e-cigarette smokers had early-onset and higher odds of stroke compared to traditional smokers. More prospective studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects and safety of e-cigarettes to mitigate the risk of cardio and cerebrovascular disorders.

Introduction: Tobacco use is one of the most significant risk factors for stroke. Besides traditional cigarettes and combustible products, the use of e-cigarettes and electronic nicotine delivery products has been widespread among young adults in the recent era. Furthermore, the trend of vaping has increased over the last decade. However, the relationship between e-cigarettes and stroke is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and identify the relationship between e-cigarette smoking and stroke. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed using the NHANES database of the US population. Adults with a history of smoking were considered in our study and divided into three groups, e-cigarette users, traditional, and dual smokers. The Chi-squared test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify the prevalence and association of e-cigarette consumption and stroke. Results: Out of a total of 266,058 respondents from 2015 to 2018, we found 79,825 respondents who smoked e-cigarettes (9.72%) or traditional (29.37%) or dual smoking (60.91%). Stroke prevalence among e-cigarette smokers was 1.57%. Stroke was more prevalent among traditional smokers than among e-cigarette smokers. (6.75% vs. 1.09%; p < 0.0001) E-cigarette smokers had early onset of stroke in comparison with traditional smokers. (median age: 48 vs. 59 years; p < 0.0001). Among females with stroke, the prevalence of e-cigarette use was higher in comparison with traditional smoking (36.36% vs. 33.91%; p < 0.0001). Among the stroke population, the prevalence of e-cigarette use was higher among Mexican-Americans (21.21% vs. 6.02%) and other Hispanics (24.24% vs. 7.70%) compared with traditional smoking (p < 0.0001). The regression analysis found higher odds of stroke history among e-cigarette users than traditional smokers [aOR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.15–1.16)]. Conclusion: Though stroke was more prevalent in traditional smokers, the incidence of stroke was early-in-onset and was strongly associated with e-cigarette use compared to traditional smokers. We have also identified vascular effects of e-cigarettes components as possible triggers for the stroke.