Back to Authors

Jeames, Sanford

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3192-1692

Mayo Clinic

Huston–Tillotson University

Citations 2

Assessing the needs of those who serve the underserved: A national survey among cancer care clinicians.
Patel, Manali I. , Merrill, Janette K. , Smith, Kimberly T., Carrizosa, Daniel R. , Florez, Narjust, Gomez, Scarlett Lin , Hinyard, Leslie , Jeames, Sanford , Kalwar, Tricia, Kircher, Sheetal , Tap, William D. , Fashoyin-Aje, Lola , Giuliani, Meredith Elana , Hlubocky, Fay J. , Kamaraju, Sailaja

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 30, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 28_suppl | Pages: 175-175

10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.175 Get It

175 Background: In 2009, ASCO confirmed that addressing cancer care disparities is critical for the Society and committed to approaches to eliminate such disparities. Yet, gaps remain in identifying the best approaches to do so. It remains unknown which cancer care providers serve patients from “underserved populations'' (defined as individuals who have historically received inadequate health care and health care services), what unmet needs they experience in their cancer care delivery, and how best to engage and support these providers. The objectives of this study were to explore challenges faced by providers serving underserved patients to inform development of a broader online survey and identify solutions that ASCO can implement to better support these providers. Methods: A multi-phase mixed-methods approach was utilized. Phase 1 involved key informant semi-structured interviews with 12 oncology providers caring for adult patients in the US from April to May 2021. Phase 2 involved survey development based on themes identified in Phase 1. The survey assessed: provider needs; processes for eliciting, documenting, and addressing social and economic needs of patients; and how ASCO could best support these providers. Phase 3 involved email distribution of the online survey in May 2022 to 5800 individuals identified through ASCO’s customer database. Eligibility criteria included providing care for adults with cancer in the US and prior consent to receive ASCO survey communications. Results: Of 477 respondents, the majority were ASCO members (88%), in an academic practice (57%), medical oncologists (77%), non-Hispanic (89%) and/or Caucasian/White (67%) and had > 15 years’ clinical experience (57%). A majority (60%) provided ≥25% of their clinical time providing cancer care to underserved populations and routinely engaged with administration to secure resources (61%) and local community organizations to obtain services (42%) for patients. Most (43-77%) indicated that a social worker/case manager was primarily responsible for addressing patient social needs. The majority reported that identification and dissemination of best practices (55%) and development of a return-on-investment business model (60%) would best help address patient needs. Some respondents expressed a desire to collaborate with ASCO on policy reform (32%) and for ASCO to help build or strengthen partnerships with local initiatives (29%). Conclusions: This is the first US-based survey assessing barriers and solutions to delivering cancer care among underserved populations. The findings from this work provide insights about how ASCO can help equip practices to address the social needs of their patients. Further work will be conducted to develop and implement suggested solutions.
Increasing Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Cancer Clinical Trials: An American Society of Clinical Oncology and Association of Community Cancer Centers Joint Research Statement
Oyer, Randall A. , Hurley, Patricia A. , Boehmer, Leigh , Bruinooge, Suanna S. , Levit, Kathryn , Barrett, Nadine J. , Benson, Al B. , Bernick, Lea Ann, Byatt, Leslie, Charlot, Marjory , Crews, Jennie R. , DeLeon, Kyle, Green, Sybil, Guerra, Carmen E. , Hamroun, Leila, Hardy, Claudia M. , Hempstead, Bridgette, Jeames, Sanford , Mann, Mel , Matin, Khalid , McCaskill‐Stevens, Worta , Merrill, Janette K. , Nowakowski, Grzegorz S. , Patel, Manali I. , Pressman, Alice , Segura, Juanita, Segarra-Vasquez, Barbara, Williams, Jen Hanley, Williams, J.E. Caerwyn , Winkfield, Karen M. , Yang, Eddy S. , Zwicker, Victoria, Pierce, Lori J. , Hurley, Patricia , Bruinooge, Suanna Steeby , Barrett, Nadine , Benson, Al , Fashoyin-Aje, Lola , Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth , Gralow, Julie R , Guerra, Carmen E , Jeames, Sanford , Mann, Mel , Merrill, Janette , Nowakowski, Grzegorz S , Patel, Manali I , Pressman, Alice , Ramirez, Amelie G , Hanley Williams, Jen , Williams, James E , Winkfield, Karen M , Yang, Eddy S , Pierce, Lori J , Charlot, Marjory , Oyer, Randall A , Garrett‐Mayer, Elizabeth , Gralow, Julie R. , Segarra-Vasquez, Barbara

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 19, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 2163-2171

10.1200/jco.22.00754 Get It

A concerted commitment across research stakeholders is necessary to increase equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) and address barriers to cancer clinical trial recruitment and participation. Racial and ethnic diversity among trial participants is key to understanding intrinsic and extrinsic factors that may affect patient response to cancer treatments. This ASCO and Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) Research Statement presents specific recommendations and strategies for the research community to improve EDI in cancer clinical trials. There are six overarching recommendations: (1) clinical trials are an integral component of high-quality cancer care, and every person with cancer should have the opportunity to participate; (2) trial sponsors and investigators should design and implement trials with a focus on reducing barriers and enhancing EDI, and work with sites to conduct trials in ways that increase participation of under-represented populations; (3) trial sponsors, researchers, and sites should form long-standing partnerships with patients, patient advocacy groups, and community leaders and groups; (4) anyone designing or conducting trials should complete recurring education, training, and evaluation to demonstrate and maintain cross-cultural competencies, mitigation of bias, effective communication, and a commitment to achieving EDI; (5) research stakeholders should invest in programs and policies that increase EDI in trials and in the research workforce; and (6) research stakeholders should collect and publish aggregate data on racial and ethnic diversity of trial participants when reporting results of trials, programs, and interventions to increase EDI. The recommendations are intended to serve as a guide for the research community to improve participation rates among people from racial and ethnic minority populations historically under-represented in cancer clinical trials. ASCO and ACCC will work at all levels to advance the recommendations in this publication.