Sarret, Philippe

AbstractChronic neuropathic pain arising from peripheral nerve damage is a severe clinical issue where there is a major unmet medical need. We previously demonstrated that both neurotensin (NT) receptor subtypes 1 (NTS1) and 2 (NTS2) are involved in mediating the naloxone‐insensitive antinociceptive effects of neurotensin in different analgesic tests including hotplate, tail‐flick, and tonic pain. However, the role of these receptors in neuropathic pain management has been poorly investigated. In the present study, we therefore examined whether intrathecal delivery ofNTS1 agonists was effective in reducing neuropathic pain symptoms in rats. Neuropathy was induced by sciatic nerve constriction (CCImodel), and the development of mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia on the ipsi‐ and contralateral hind paws was examined 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days post‐surgery.CCI‐operated rats exhibited significant increases in thermal and mechanical hypersensitivities over a 28‐day testing period. Spinal injection ofNTtoCCIrats alleviated the behavioral responses to radiant heat and mechanical stimuli, with a maximal reversal of 91% of allodynia at 6 μg/kg. Intrathecal administration of theNTS1‐selective agonist,PD149163 (30–90 μg/kg) also produced potent anti‐allodynic and anti‐hyperalgesic effects in nerve‐injured rats. Likewise, heat hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia produced byCCIof the sciatic nerve were fully reversed by theNTS1 agonist,NT69L(5–25 μg/kg). Altogether, these results support the idea that theNTS1 receptor subtype is involved in pain modulation, and the potential use ofNTS1 agonists for the treatment of painful neuropathies.

BackgroundCentral neurotensin (NT) administration results in a naloxone-insensitive antinociceptive response in animal models of acute and persistent pain. Both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors were shown to be required for different aspects of NT-induced analgesia. We recently demonstrated that NTS2 receptors were extensively associated with ascending nociceptive pathways, both at the level of the dorsal root ganglia and of the spinal dorsal horn. Then, we found that spinally administered NTS2-selective agonists induced dose-dependent antinociceptive responses in the acute tail-flick test. In the present study, we therefore investigated whether activation of spinal NTS2 receptors suppressed the persistent inflammatory pain symptoms observed after intraplantar injection of formalin.ResultsWe first demonstrated that spinally administered NT and NT69L agonists, which bind to both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors, significantly reduced pain-evoked responses during the inflammatory phase of the formalin test. Accordingly, pretreatment with the NTS2-selective analogs JMV-431 and levocabastine was effective in inhibiting the aversive behaviors induced by formalin. With resolution at the single-cell level, we also found that activation of spinal NTS2 receptors reduced formalin-induced c-fos expression in dorsal horn neurons. However, our results also suggest that NTS2-selective agonists and NTS1/NTS2 mixed compounds differently modulated the early (21–39 min) and late (40–60 min) tonic phase 2 and recruited endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms integrated at different levels of the central nervous system. Indeed, while non-selective drugs suppressed pain-related behaviors activity in both part of phase 2, intrathecal injection of NTS2-selective agonists was only efficient in reducing pain during the late phase 2. Furthermore, assessment of the stereotypic pain behaviors of lifting, shaking, licking and biting to formalin also revealed that unlike non-discriminative NTS1/NTS2 analogs reversing all nociceptive endpoint behaviors, pure NTS2 agonists specifically inhibited paw lifting, supporting a role of NTS2 in spinal modulation of persistent nociception.ConclusionThe present study provides the first demonstration that activation of NTS2 receptors produces analgesia in the persistent inflammatory pain model of formalin. The dichotomy between these two classes of compounds also indicates that both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors are involved in tonic pain inhibition and implies that these two NT receptors modulate the pain-induced behavioral responses by acting on distinct spinal and/or supraspinal neural circuits. In conclusion, development of NT agonists targeting both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors could be useful for chronic pain management.