Abstract Background Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is increasingly recognized among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH), which is likely related to metabolic alterations and fat redistribution. Anthropometric measures such as body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) are commonly used for assessing metabolic risk. However, their predictive accuracy for MASLD in this population remains uncertain. Method This multicenter cross-sectional study enrolled adults with HIV who underwent transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measurement. Anthropometric and metabolic indices, including BMI, WC, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and visceral adiposity index (VAI), were collected from the study participants. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic performance of these indices for detecting hepatic steatosis, defined as CAP value of ≥248 dB/m. Analyses were stratified by sex assigned at birth. Results Altogether, 256 participants were included. WC demonstrated the numerically highest discrimination for CAP-defined steatosis (area under the ROC curve 0.769), followed by BMI and hip circumference, whereas WHR and VAI showed weaker performance. In sex-stratified analyses, WC remained the numerically highest-performing measure among males, whereas BMI, WC, hip circumference, and VAI showed similar discrimination among females. Conclusions Simple anthropometric measures, particularly WC, show fair ability to discriminate CAP-defined hepatic steatosis in PWH and may facilitate targeted fatty liver screening in routine HIV care.
Efficacy and Safety of Twice-Daily versus Three-Times Daily Saquinavir Soft Gelatin Capsules as Part of Triple Combination Therapy for HIV-1 Infection
Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether a triple therapy regimen incorporating twice-daily saquinavir is as effective as a three-times daily regimen. Methods This was an open-label, Phase III, multicentre, 48-week study involving 837 HIV-1-infected patients randomised to one of the following: saquinavir soft gel capsule (SGC) 1200 mg three-times daily, plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (arm A); saquinavir SGC 1600 mg twice-daily, plus two NRTIs (arm B); saquinavir SGC 1200 mg twice-daily and nelfinavir 1250 mg twice-daily, plus a single NRTI (arm C). The primary outcome measure was the virological response in arm A versus B and in arm A versus C with respect to the percentage of patients whose plasma HIV-1 RNA levels fell below the level of quantification for the Amplicor assay (<400 copies/ml) at weeks 24 and 48. Results At 48 weeks, the percentage of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/ml was 47.1% (arm A), 45.3% (arm B) and 42.7% (arm C) in the intention-to-treat analysis. The treatment difference between arm B–arm A was -1.8% (95% confidence intervals -10.1, 6.5) and for arm C–arm A was -4.5% (95% confidence intervals -12.7, 3.7) in the intention-to-treat analysis. These differences fell within the maximum allowable difference (±12%) for arm B compared with arm A. At week 24, the percentage of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/ml was 59.6% (arm A), 57.6% (arm B) and 51.3% (arm C). Conclusions A twice-daily triple therapy regimen incorporating saquinavir SGC plus two NRTIs was of equivalent efficacy to the three-times daily regimen studied. All regimens were generally well tolerated.