Back to Authors

Achebe, Ikechukwu

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1077-2787

Mayo Clinic

University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

Citations 3

EUS-guided gallbladder drainage vs dual stent transpapillary gallbladder drainage for management of acute cholecystitis
Amin, Dhruval , Rau, Prashanth , Cooper, Katherine M. , Sayegh, Lea N. , Mostafa, Nouran, Achebe, Ikechukwu , DeVore, Zachary, Gonzalez, Daniella, Stephanie, Stephanie , Mehta, Savant, Marshall, Christopher , Nasser‐Ghodsi, Navine , Marya, Neil B. , Cooper, Katherine M , Sayegh, Lea Nicole , Storm, Andrew C , Mostafa, Nouran, Zivny, Jaroslav, Storm, Andrew C. , Marya, Neil B.

Endoscopy International Open | January 2, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: CP | Pages: No page available

10.1055/a-2509-7076 Get It

Abstract Cholecystectomy (CCY) is the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis. For non-surgical patients, percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PT-GBD) is recommended but is associated with high readmission rates and poor quality of life. Endoscopic gallbladder decompression techniques, including endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ET-GBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), are alternatives. Studies comparing ET-GBD and EUS-GBD have shown EUS-GBD to have superior outcomes. However, these studies assessed ET-GBD mostly via single transcystic stent placement (SSET-GBD). This study aimed to compare outcomes of dual transcystic stents (DSET-GBD) and EUS-GBD in non-surgical candidates with acute cholecystitis. A multicenter analysis was conducted on patients who underwent ET-GBD or EUS-GBD between January 2019 and January 2023. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and outcomes including technical success, success, adverse events (AEs), and recurrence rates of cholecystitis were measured. Of 129 procedures (56 EUS-GBD; 73 ET-GBD), technical success was achieved in 87.5% of EUS-GBD and 86.3% of ET-GBD attempts. Immediate clinical success was achieved in 98.1% for EUS-GBD and 100% for DSET-GBD. AE rates were similar between the groups. Recurrent cholecystitis rates were 5.3% for EUS-GBD and 8.2% for DSET-GBD (P = 0.692). This study demonstrates that DSET-GBD has similarly low rates of recurrent acute cholecystitis compared with EUS-GBD. DSET-GBD should be considered as an alternative management strategy for management of acute cholecystitis in patients who are unable to undergo CCY.
S1231 Predictors of Successful Stone Fragmentation and Extraction Using Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy: A Multicentric Study
Sayegh, Lea N. , Akiki, Karl, Salame, Marita , Annan, Karim Al , Winkie, Mason, Kolachana, Sindhura, Yohannan, Ethan David, Marya, Neil B. , Pawa, Swati , Kim, Raymond , Akiki, Karl, Fadel, Anthony , Achebe, Ikechukwu , Canakis, Andrew , Marya, Neil B. , Pawa, Rishi , Storm, Andrew C.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 18, 2023 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 10S | Pages: S940-S941

10.14309/01.ajg.0000954564.56753.77 Get It

Left-Sided Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction and Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Hussain, Kifah , Kattoor, Ajoe John , Parfieniuk, Agata, Achebe, Ikechukwu , Liu, Bolun , Doukky, Rami

No container title available | April 5, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.22541/au.164915921.19600567/v1 Get It

Purpose We sought to investigate the association between left-sided prosthetic valve dysfunction and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Methods In a retrospective cohort of patients with left-sided prostheses, we identified those who experienced one or more GI bleeds. The latest or chronologically closest echocardiogram to the GI bleed was analyzed by a blinded investigator for prosthetic valve dysfunction. Results Among 334 unique patients, 166 had aortic prostheses, 127 had mitral prostheses, and 41 had both. A total of 58 (17.4%) subjects had GI bleeding events. Patients in the “GI Bleed” group had higher mean ejection fraction (56±14% vs. 49±15%; P = 0.003) and higher prevalence of hypertension, end-stage renal disease, and liver cirrhosis compared to the “No GI Bleed” group. There was a higher prevalence of moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation in the GI Bleed vs. No GI Bleed group (8.6% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.027). Moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation was independently associated with GI bleeding (odds ratio, 6.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-30.05; P = 0.024), after adjusting for ejection fraction, hypertension, end-stage renal disease and liver cirrhosis. Paravalvular regurgitation was associated with a higher incidence of GI bleeding compared to transvalvular regurgitation (35.7% vs. 11.9%; P = 0.044). The prevalence of prosthetic valve stenosis was similar between the GI Bleed and No GI Bleed groups (6.9% vs. 5.8%; P = 0.761). Conclusion In a cohort of patients with predominantly surgically placed prosthetic valves, moderate to severe left-sided prosthetic valve regurgitation was independently associated with GI bleeding.