Murray, David

Abstract Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a precursor to multiple myeloma (MM). Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is a precursor to either myeloid or lymphoid malignancy, depending on whether the mutation is in a gene associated with lymphoid (L-CHIP) or myeloid (M-CHIP) outcome. Little is known about the association between CHIP and MGUS and their combined effect on risk of MM. We examined this question within Mayo Clinic Biobank cohort of participants aged 50 years or older with no prior history of hematological malignancies. Using whole blood, individuals were screened for MGUS using a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry assay. M-CHIP and L-CHIP were defined based on mutations in 56 genes associated with myeloid malignancies or mutations in 235 genes associated with lymphoid malignancies, respectively, using whole-exome-sequencing. Incident MM was identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes and confirmed via medical record review. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals for the association of CHIP and MGUS. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR), with time defined as date between blood sample and the first incident MM, date of death, or 12/31/2023. All models were adjusted for age and sex. Of the 16, 479 individuals (median age 65 years, 45% male) screened, 12.3% were positive for MGUS, 9.8% were positive for M-CHIP, and 1.5% were positive for L-CHIP. There was no evidence of an association between M-CHIP and MGUS (OR=0.97, 95% CI:0.83-1.12) nor L-CHIP and MGUS (OR=1.12, 95% CI:0.78-1.57), including with any MGUS isotype (IgA, IgG, or IgM; P-values>0.22). Next, we investigated the association of these precursors on risk of MM. Median follow-up was 11.7 years (range 0.1-15.1), and 46 individuals developed incident MM. Both MGUS (HR=29.7, 95% CI: 14.1-62.4) and L-CHIP (HR=4.1, 95% CI: 1.3-13.2) were significantly associated with incident MM, but not M-CHIP (HR-1.0, 95% CI: 0.4-2.5). Investigating the combined effect of MGUS and L-CHIP, we found those with MGUS alone had a 27.5-fold (95% CI: 13.0-58.2) increased risk of incident MM compared to those with no precursors. No individuals with L-CHIP only developed MM, but those with both L-CHIP and MGUS had a 129.4-fold (95% CI: 34.4-486.4) increased risk of incident MM. In the largest cohort with screened MGUS and CHIP, we found no evidence of an association between either definition of CHIP with MGUS. However, individuals with both L-CHIP and MGUS were at the highest risk of developing MM. Citation Format: Nicholas J. Boddicker, Cristine Allmer, Danelle H. Moonen, Aaron D. Norman, Angelica Macauda, Alyssa Clay-Gilmour, Janet E. Olson, Mrinal S. Patnaik, Vincent Rajkumar, Esteban Braggio, David L. Murray, Shaji Kumar, Susan L. Slager, Celine M. Vachon. The association between MGUS and CHIP and their impact on multiple myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4917.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of multiple myeloma (MM) in individuals of genetic European ancestry (EA) have identified 35 susceptibility loci. Co-heritability analyses have revealed a strong genetic correlation between MM and its precursor condition, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Previous research validated the association between a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 23 MM risk loci and the risk of MGUS. Went and colleagues recently reported 12 new MM risk loci. We constructed a MM-PRS using all 35 MM risk variants and assessed its association with MGUS. Additionally, among individuals with MGUS, we assessed associations of MM-PRS with established prognostic factors [M-protein (<0.2 g/dL; 0.2-1.5 g/dL; >1.5 g/dL); isotype (IgG, IgA, IgM); free light chain (FLC) ratio (Normal (0.26-1.65), Abnormal (<0.26 or >1.65))]. Our study population included 1,723 individuals with MGUS seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and 14,175 controls from the Mayo Clinic Biobank who lived in the 27-county region around Rochester, MN, and screened negative for MGUS using MALDI-TOF MS. The majority of MGUS patients and controls were of EA. We used logistic or multinomial regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All models were adjusted for age, sex, and the first three principal components. The MM-PRS was significantly associated with MGUS when assessed continuously (OR, 1.28 per standard deviation (SD); 95% CI, 1.22-1.35). When comparing to the middle quintile of the MM-PRS distribution, individuals in the highest quintile had 1.41-fold increased risk of MGUS (95% CI, 1.21-1.64), and individuals in the lowest quintile had 0.68 decreased risk of MGUS (95% CI, 0.57-0.81). Of the 35 SNPs evaluated, 27 demonstrated consistent directions of effect for risk of MGUS with published risk estimates for MM. The effect of MM-PRS differed by isotype (P = 2.2 x 105), with higher MM-PRS associated with IgA MGUS (OR, 1.40 per SD; 95% CI, 1.08-1.81) and a lower MM-PRS associated with IgM (OR, 0.66 per SD; 95% CI, 0.52-0.84) compared to IgG MGUS. The MM-PRS was higher in MGUS patients with M-protein > 1.5 g/dL compared to M-protein of size 0.2-1.5 g/dL, although not statistically significant (OR, 1.41 per SD; 95% CI, 0.95-2.08); there were no differences in the MM-PRS between MGUS patients with M-protein size <0.2 g/dL compared to 0.2-1.5 g/dL (OR, 1.01 per SD;95% CI, 0.81-1.26). There were also no differences in MM-PRS by FLC ratio, (OR, 0.95 per SD; 95% CI, 0.852-1.10 for abnormal vs. normal). Our findings of an association of the MM-PRS with risk of MGUS provides further evidence for shared heritability between MGUS and MM. Future studies are needed to examine whether the expanded MM-PRS adds to existing models for MGUS progression. Citation Format: Angelica Macauda, Alyssa Clay-Gilmour, Cristine Allmer, Danelle Moonen, Aaron D. Normann, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Joselle M. Cook, Linda Baughn, Elizabeth E. Brown, Vincent S. Rajkumar, Esteban Braggio, David L. Murray, Susan L. Slager, Shaji Kumar, Celine M. Vachon. Implications of multiple myeloma polygenic risk scores (PRS) for MGUS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 2274.

Abstract Background Immunoglobulin (Ig) measurements in the clinical laboratory have been traditionally performed by nephelometry, turbidimetry, electrophoresis, and ELISA assays. Mass spectrometry (MS) measurements have the potential to provide deeper insights on the nature of these markers. Content Different approaches—top-down, middle-down, or bottom-up—have been described for measuring specific Igs for endogenous monoclonal immunoglobulins (M-proteins) and exogenous therapeutic monoclonal antibody therapies (t-mAbs). Challenges arise in distinguishing the Ig of interest from the polyclonal Ig background. MS is emerging as a practical method to provide quantitative analysis and information about structural and clonal features that are not easily determined by current clinical laboratory methods. This review discusses clinically implemented examples, including isotyping and quantification of M-proteins and quantitation of t-mAbs within the polyclonal Ig background, as examples of how MS can enhance our detection and characterization of Igs. Summary This review of current clinically available MS proteomic tests for Igs highlights both analytical and nonanalytical challenges for implementation. Given the new insight into Igs from these methods, it is hoped that vendors, laboratorians, healthcare providers, and payment systems can work to overcome these challenges and advance the care of patients.

Background: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a severe thrombotic thrombocytopenia that predominantly occurs after adenoviral vector-based vaccines. VITT patients produce anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies with restricted clonality (i.e., mono/oligoclonal) with lambda light chains. Long-term follow-up studies in VITT show a disconnect in the persistence of anti-PF4 antibodies, whereby ELISA-positive antibodies persist significantly longer than platelet-activating antibodies. The mechanistic basis of this is unclear and could be explained by a couple of hypotheses: (1) Epitope spreading where, with time, the specificity of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies may “spread” to recognize only PF4 complexed to heparin vs. (2) Persistence of clonally restricted platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies which decrease in titers with time such that their levels are insufficient to crosslink platelet FcGRIIa and induce platelet activation. Methods: Acute, convalescent patient sera and affinity-purified anti-PF4 antibodies were evaluated in antigen-based, functional (platelet-activation-based), and mass spectrometry studies as previously described (Blood, 2022 Jul 7;140(1):73-77). The median time to last follow-up was 243 days after the acute episode (range: 114-664 days). Results: Follow-up samples were obtained from 6 VITT patients after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. At last follow-up, anti-PF4 IgG antibodies reactive in PF4/polyanion ELISA were detected in the sera of 5/6 VITT patients. However, only one of these samples stimulated platelet activation in the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA; 199 days after acute presentation). Affinity-purified anti-PF4 antibodies were detected by ELISA in all follow-up samples and three of the six affinity-purified anti-PF4 antibody samples activated platelets in the PEA. Four of the six VITT patients demonstrated a monoclonal anti-PF4 antibody, while one each had a biclonal and triclonal profile. Five VITT patients produced IgG lambda light chain antibodies, while one produced an IgG kappa. All six VITT patients demonstrated synonymous anti-PF4 antibody profiles when comparing acute and follow-up antibody repertoires, without evidence of VITT patients producing new anti-PF4 antibodies after the acute episode. In all cases, levels of anti-PF4 antibodies were significantly lower in convalescent samples relative to acute samples. Given this data on the persistence of clonally-restricted VITT antibodies, samples from another VITT patient with thrombocytopenia (100-150,000/uL) persisting for more than three years were similarly evaluated. This patient, who experienced severe thrombosis after ChAdOx1 nCoV19 vaccination, demonstrated persistent ELISA and PEA positivity even three years after symptom onset but had not experienced breakthrough thrombosis while on anticoagulation therapy. Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) did not detect a monoclonal gammopathy. Anti-PF4 antibodies immuno-enriched from a sample obtained >2 years after acute presentation demonstrated a monoclonal profile. While non-availability of an acute sample for anti-PF4 antibody characterization precluded a firm determination of whether this “Long VITT” case represented a subset of monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS; Blood 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1772-1776; New Eng J Med 2024 Aug 8), the chronicity of thrombocytopenia, presence of a monoclonal anti-PF4 antibody and persistently positive anti-PF4 serology supports this diagnosis. Conclusions. Clonally-restricted VITT antibodies persist for months-years with no evidence for the production of novel anti-PF4 antibodies after the acute event. Decreased abundance of anti-PF4 antibodies leads to negative functional results with follow up samples. Some platelet-activating antibodies can persist for very long periods (>3 years) and mediate persistent thrombocytopenia, representing an SPEP-negative MGTS-like state. This study also demonstrates the first example of a VITT antibody with a kappa light chain. The requirement for anticoagulation in patients demonstrating ELISA-positive/functional test-negative results is not clear, but the persistence of mono/oligoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies raises the possibility for the upregulation of pathogenic antibody production in proinflammatory settings.

Introduction: Uniform assessment of response to treatment is crucial to managing myeloma and developing new therapies. Measurement of the monoclonal protein (s) secreted by the myeloma cells forms the cornerstone of disease assessment in MM and has primarily been performed by electrophoretic methods in the serum and urine, as well as assessment of free light chains in the serum. According to international myeloma working group (IMWG) guidelines, serial serum-free light chain (sFLC) is included in MM response assessment to define stringent complete response and for evaluating partial response (PR) or progressive disease (PD) in non/oligo-secretory MM. This study aims to determine the added value of serial sFLC measurements in monitoring response and progression in MM with measurable disease by comparing the kinetics of FLC with M spike measured by electrophoresis in serum or urine. Methods: This retrospective observational study included newly diagnosed MM patients evaluated at Mayo Clinic in Rochester between 2011-2021. All patients had measurable sFLC (involved FLC level ≥ 10mg/dL, with abnormal sFLC ratio) along with measurable M-protein by serum or urine protein electrophoresis at diagnosis. Serial measurements of sFLC and M-protein by electrophoresis (sPEP/uPEP) were prospectively collected from the electronic medical records at different time points. FLC-response and FLC-PD were evaluated based on IMWG criteria. Results: The study cohort included 839 patients, 52% with measurable M protein by electrophoresis in serum, 27% in both serum and urine, and 21% in urine-only. A significant association was observed between sFLC and electrophoretic response during the induction and at the time of best response (p <.001). Serum FLC showed a comparable response rate of 98% (≥ PR) at the time of best electrophoretic response (p <.001). Ninety-nine percent of early FLC responders eventually achieved an overall response by sPEP/uPEP (p <.001). In the urine-only group, 99% achieved at least a PR by uPEP, and all showed at least a PR based on sFLC. We observed comparable median percentage changes in serial dFLC and urine M-protein, with parallel trends (p <0.001). The correlation coefficients between the change of sFLC and urine M-protein showed a moderate/strong correlation with coefficients (r) of 0.791, 0.597, 0598, 0.545, after cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, respectively, (p < .001). The response for all cohorts was detected earlier by dFLC (median time 1.1 months, 95% CI: 1.06-1.17), in comparison with serum M-protein (1.5 months, 95% CI: 1.40-1.62) and urine M-protein (2.8 months, 95% CI: 2.42-3.10) with p < .001. In the urine-only group, earlier detection of response by dFLC (1.1 months, 95% CI: 1.00-1.2) was observed, compared to urine M-protein (2.4 months, 95% CI: 2.00-2.7) (p <.001). After a median follow-up of 52 (IQR 27.6, 72.3) months, 56% had PD: 62% by s-FLC, 56% by serum M-protein, and 24% by urine M-protein. Among patients with PD by uPEP, all except one patient met sFLC-PD. Within patients with PD, sFLC was the only detectable tumor marker in 12% of cases at the time of the second line of treatment. After four cycles of induction, there was no difference in PFS between VGPR response determined by sFLC, sPEP, and uPEP (p =0.538). The median second-PFS for patients with onlysFLC-PD was similar to those with urine M-protein PD with or without sFLC-PD (HR 1.28, 95% CI =0.77-2.13. p 0.334). However, the median overall survival (OS) from the first relapse was significantly better for patients with onlysFLC-PD than those with urine M-protein PD (HR 1.87, 95% CI =1.07-3.27. p 0.026). Conclusions: In this study, achieving sFLC-VGPR has a similar impact on PFS as electrophoretic-VGPR after induction, indicating that serial sFLC can potentially replace the requirement for urine M-protein response (< 100mg in 24-hours urine) as part of the electrophoretic-VGPR criteria, as required by IMWG. A similar response rate between sFLC and urine paraprotein confirms the current cutoffs (90% for urine and 50% for dFLC for VGPR) used for response categories for s-FLC. We also observed that in 12% of patients with PD, sFLC was the only marker of progression, highlighting the value of serial s-FLC in monitoring relapse. In conclusion, our study supports the integration of serial sFLC measurements for monitoring response and progression in MM, even with electrophoretic measurable disease.

Monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS) is a recently recognized thrombophilia characterized by the production of a monoclonal antibody that binds to platelet factor 4 (PF4) and stimulates platelet activation (Blood. 2022 Jul 7;140(1):73-77). Typical signs of MGTS include a history of recurrent thrombosis, persistent thrombocytopenia, and positive laboratory results in PF4/polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serotonin release assay (SRA) testing, as in the related thrombotic disorder heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Here, we present a case of MGTS, presenting with transient thrombocytopenia coincident with thrombotic episodes and negative test results in SRA and PF4/polyanion-based testing platforms (ELISAs and automated assays). A 56-year-old male patient initially presented with acute left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and a pulmonary embolism. Following the administration of warfarin, the patient experienced a second DVT four months later and was transitioned to a factor Xa inhibitor. Fifty-two months later, the patient developed occlusion of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins despite additional anticoagulation therapy. Further testing led to a diagnosis of an IgG2 kappa monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Eleven months later, the patient again suffered breakthrough thrombosis, specifically radial artery thrombosis, and a thrombotic cerebrovascular accident, leading to the addition of aspirin to the patient's treatment regimen. Notably, where detailed blood counts were available in the patient's clinical history, the patient experienced only transient thrombocytopenia coinciding with his two most recent thrombotic episodes and has had platelet counts in the normal range in the four-year period since his last thrombotic event. After initiating dual anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy, the patient has not developed recurrent thrombocytopenia or new thrombotic events. Antigen-based and functional testing for HIT antibodies (ELISA, SRA, and automated immunoassays) were negative in this patient, unlike in the previously described index case of MGTS, where serological testing mimicked classical HIT serology (i.e., HIT ELISA and SRA positivity). The sample was also non-reactive in a vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)-specific ELISA employing uncomplexed PF4 targets, as previously described (Am J Hematol. 2022 May;97(5):519-526). Conversely, the patient's antibody consistently stimulated platelet activation in a PF4- and IgG-dependent manner in functional testing using PF4-treated platelets. This included PF4-treated platelets that were freshly isolated and used in the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA) and cryopreserved platelets used in the thrombospondin-1 release assay. Interestingly, consistently positive PEA results have been documented from four samples over the last four years, during which the patient had normal platelet counts. To further characterize the patient's IgG2 MGUS antibody, the patient's monoclonal was immuno-enriched. Patient sera and the immuno-enriched MGUS were then compared by mass spectrometry, which generated identical mass profiles. After confirming the effective enrichment of the patient's MGUS by mass spectrometry, the antibody was de novo sequenced or “reverse-engineered” to obtain the antibody's amino acid sequence. The antibody was then expressed and tested in ELISA-based and functional platelet assays. Importantly, the recombinant antibody replicated the PF4-dependent platelet activation observed with patient serum and did not bind PF4/polyanion targets in ELISA testing. Together, these data strongly support the identification of a new class of ELISA- and SRA-negative anti-PF4 monoclonal antibodies that cause MGTS. This case illustrates the diagnostic challenges in MGTS. MGTS patients may not exhibit persistent thrombocytopenia, and diagnostic tests for detecting HIT antibodies may be ineffective in accurately diagnosing this new thrombophilia. This case emphasizes the importance of reviewing platelet counts in the peri-thrombotic period to recognize transient thrombocytopenia and establishes the utility of PF4-enhanced functional assays to detect pathogenic anti-PF4 antibodies, even in settings where classical HIT testing (i.e., ELISA/SRA) is negative.

Abstract Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is an asymptomatic premalignant disorder. The current standard of care is not to screen for MGUS, so it is often incidentally diagnosed in the clinic. It is unknown whether the outcomes of screened vs clinically detected MGUS differ. We compared the progression risk between screened vs clinical MGUS cohorts and assessed whether the MGUS detection method affected risk prediction of established clinical factors (score). We included 379 screened MGUS cases from the Olmsted County population-based study and 1384 patients with MGUS diagnosed during routine clinical evaluation at Mayo Clinic. Median follow-up time for the screened vs clinical cohort was 26.6 and 40.1 years, respectively. Accounting for death as a competing risk, the cumulative incidence of progression at 25 years was similar in the screened (11.1% [95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3-14.8]) vs clinical (10.1% [95% CI, 8.6-11.8]) MGUS cohorts, even when stratified by sex, age, or the baseline MGUS risk score. Overall, 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.2) of patients with screened MGUS vs 1.0 (95% CI, 0.9-1.2) of those with clinically detected MGUS experienced disease progression for every 100 person-years of follow-up. MGUS detection method did not modify the association between MGUS risk score and progression risk (pinteraction = 0.217) and did not add to known risk factors for progression (likelihood ratio test; P = .839). Here, we show that progression risk among patients with screened vs clinically detected heavy-chain MGUS was similar. Future studies are needed to assess whether tailored follow-up of patients with screened MGUS affects clinical outcomes.

Abstract Background Hypergammaglobulinemia poses a challenge for identifying and quantitating monoclonal proteins (M-protein). The Increased polyclonal immunoglobulin background can lead to imprecise estimation of the M-protein when quantitated by serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP). This is especially true using the perpendicular drop method of peak integration. Hypergammaglobulinemia also makes it difficult to detect small M-proteins on immunofixation electrophoresis. Overestimation of M-protein concentration can lead to unnecessary follow-ups while missing small M-proteins can mask the underlying diagnosis for patients. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the prevalence and concentration of M-protein within polyclonal hypergamma backgrounds using immunocapture matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry (MASS-FIX). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 47061 unique patients tested for SPEP and MASS-FIX in 2022 at Mayo Clinic. If a patient underwent multiple tests during this period, only the first result was included in the analysis. Polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia was defined as a gamma fraction >1.7g/dL by SPEP. MASS-FIX was used to identify and isotype M-proteins. MASS-FIX was then combined with total immunoglobin quantitation (IgG, IgA or IgM) using nephelometry to quantify concentration of the M- protein using mathematical modeling (method currently under validation). Results Of the 47,061 unique patients, 24,796 were normal by SPEP (53%). M-spikes were present in 5,808 cases (12%). Hypogammaglobulinemia (gamma fraction < 0.5g/dL) in 2897 cases (6%). Small non-quantifiable M-proteins by SPEP were present in 8363 cases (18%). [JC2] There were 4222 hypergamma cases in the cohort (9%), without a quantitative M-spike on SPEP. Of these, 16.1% (680/4222) patients had an M-protein by MASS-FIX. When polyclonal hypergamma was the sole SPEP abnormality, 5.5% were MASS-FIX positive. However, when a small abnormality pattern was observed within the polyclonal hypergamma background on SPEP, 50% of patients were MASS-FIX positive. The most common isotype was IgG (27.2%), followed by IgM (10.2%), IgA (8.1%), and biclonal (3.7%), which is similar to overall isotype distribution in other backgrounds. Using quantitative MASS-FIX, we identified that 95% MASS-FIX positive small monoclonal proteins in polyclonal hypergamma are < 1 g/dL, which is the recommended limited of quantitation for M-protein using SPEP in setting of hypergammaglobulinemia. Conclusion Majority of polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia cases (83.9%) do not have a monoclonal protein. MASS-FIX allows quantitation of small monoclonal proteins below the SPEP limit of quantitation, which can enhance our understanding of conditions which present with small M-proteins in a polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia background. Small visual abnormalities within polyclonal hypergamma background on SPEP should be followed-up with immunofixation or MASS-FIX to confirm the presence or absence of M- proteins.