Schwamm, Lee H.

Importance The APOE ε4 variant is causally linked to cerebral amyloid angiopathy and is a risk factor for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) among warfarin-treated patients with atrial fibrillation. Nevertheless, its impact on those treated with apixaban remains unknown. Objective To test the hypothesis that APOE ε4 allele carriership is associated with an increased risk of ICH in patients with atrial fibrillation taking apixaban. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study involved data from the All of Us Research Program, a longitudinal, population-based study in the United States. Inclusion criteria were age older than 50 years, history of atrial fibrillation, and anticoagulation with apixaban. Participants with a history of ischemic stroke or ICH were excluded. Up to 3 years of follow-up data were available. Data were collected from 2017 to 2022 and analyzed from November 2023 to December 2024. Exposure APOE ε2, ε3, and ε4 were ascertained using variants rs429358 and rs7412. APOE ε4 was modeled dichotomously (noncarriers [no alleles] vs carriers [1 or 2 alleles]). Main Outcomes and Measures Incident ICH, including any new intraparenchymal, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhage after initiation of apixaban therapy. Results Of 413 477 All of Us participants, 2038 were eligible. Their mean (SD) age was 71 (9) years; 918 (45%) were female, 1120 (55%) were male, and 1710 (83%) had European ancestry. Among these participants, 483 (23.7%) were carriers of at least 1 APOE ε4 allele. After a median follow-up of 2.9 years, 26 participants sustained an ICH (cumulative incidence, 1.5%; 95% CI, 1.0%-2.2%), of whom 12 (cumulative incidence, 3.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.3%) were carriers and 14 (cumulative incidence, 1%; 95% CI, 0.6%-1.7%) were noncarriers ( P = .007). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models confirmed this association: compared with noncarriership, APOE ε4 carriership was associated with a 3-fold increase in the risk of ICH (hazard ratio, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.42-6.65). APOE information improved the discrimination of risk prediction scores (C statistic of 0.74 and 0.68 for models with and without APOE , respectively; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance Further research is needed to evaluate whether cerebral amyloid angiopathy mediates the observed association and whether APOE e4 information improves clinical decision-making about anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. The latter is important now that APOE information is used in clinical settings to guide antiamyloid treatment for Alzheimer disease and has been returned to millions of persons by direct-to-consumer genotyping companies.

Introduction: Coagulation factor XI (FXI) inhibitors have shown a better safety profile than other anticoagulants, offering similar reductions in ischemic stroke (IS) risk with a lower risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The APOE ε4 genotype is associated with increased risks of both IS and ICH, likely due to its effects on lipid levels, intracranial atherosclerosis, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. We hypothesized that APOE ε4 carriers would gain greater therapeutic benefit from genetically reduced FXI levels compared to non-carriers. Methods: We conducted a two-stage Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using the random-effects, inverse-variance weighted method. First, we estimated the effect of genetically proxied FXI inhibition on IS and ICH risk in the general population using summary data from genome-wide association studies of FXI levels (16,169 participants), IS (1,503,898 controls and 110,182 cases), and ICH (3,745 controls and 3,226 cases). Second, we performed stratified analyses to estimate the effect of genetically determined FXI levels on IS (10,343 cases and 476,838 controls) and ICH (2,236 cases and 484,945 controls) risk across APOE ε4 carriership strata (0, 1, or 2 alleles) using UK Biobank data. Results: In the general population, random-effects, inverse-variance weighted MR analyses showed that every 1 unit decrease in natural log-transformed FXI levels was associated with a 37% reduction in IS risk (OR:0.63; 95%CI:0.52–0.77; p <0.001) without a significant increase in ICH risk (OR:0.86; 95%CI:0.37–2.00; p =0.73). Stratified MR analyses indicated that genetically determined reductions in FXI levels had varying protective effects on IS risk based on APOE ε4 status: 31% in non-carriers (OR:0.69, 95%CI:0.53–0.91; p =0.008), 43% in carriers of 1 allele (OR:0.57, 95%CI:0.36–0.91; p =0.02), and 75% in carriers of 2 alleles (OR:0.25, 95%CI:0.06–1.06; p =0.06). Similar MR analyses showed no significant increase in ICH risk with genetically determined reductions in FXI levels in any APOE ε4 strata (all p >0.38, Figure 1). Conclusion: This two-stage genetic study provides causal evidence that lower FXI levels reduce IS risk in the general population, with an even stronger effect among APOE ε4 carriers, while not increasing ICH risk. These results indicate that FXI inhibitors might be a safer and more effective alternative to other anticoagulants among APOE ε4 carriers, who are known to be at higher risk for both ischemic and hemorrhagic events.

Importance Numerous studies show that early palliative care improves quality of life and other key outcomes in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers, although most lack access to this evidence-based model of care. Objective To evaluate whether delivering early palliative care via secure video vs in-person visits has an equivalent effect on quality of life in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized, multisite, comparative effectiveness trial from June 14, 2018, to May 4, 2023, at 22 US cancer centers among 1250 patients within 12 weeks of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC and 548 caregivers. Intervention Participants were randomized to meet with a specialty-trained palliative care clinician every 4 weeks either via video visit or in person in the outpatient clinic from the time of enrollment and throughout the course of disease. The video visit group had an initial in-person visit to establish rapport, followed by subsequent virtual visits. Main Outcomes and Measures Equivalence of the effect of video visit vs in-person early palliative care on quality of life at week 24 per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung questionnaire (equivalence margin of ±4 points; score range: 0-136, with higher scores indicating better quality of life). Participants completed study questionnaires at enrollment and at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48. Results By 24 weeks, participants (mean age, 65.5 years; 54.0% women; 82.7% White) had a mean of 4.7 (video) and 4.9 (in-person) early palliative care encounters. Patient-reported quality-of-life scores were equivalent between groups (video mean, 99.7 vs in-person mean, 97.7; difference, 2.0 [90% CI, 0.1-3.9]; P = .04 for equivalence). Rate of caregiver participation in visits was lower for video vs in-person early palliative care (36.6% vs 49.7%; P &amp;lt; .001). Study groups did not differ in caregiver quality of life, patient coping, or patient and caregiver satisfaction with care, mood symptoms, or prognostic perceptions. Conclusions and Relevance The delivery of early palliative care virtually vs in person demonstrated equivalent effects on quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC, underscoring the considerable potential for improving access to this evidence-based care model through telehealth delivery. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375489

Abstract Virtual care, introduced previously as a replacement for in-person visits, is now being integrated into clinical care delivery models to complement in-person visits. The COVID-19 pandemic sped up this process. The rapid uptake of virtual care at the start of the pandemic prevented educators from taking deliberate steps to design the foundational elements of the related learning environment, including workflow, competencies, and assessment methods. Educators must now pursue an informed and purposeful approach to design a curriculum and implement virtual care in the learning environment. Engaging learners in virtual care offers opportunities for novel ways to teach and assess their performance and to effectively integrate technology such that it is accessible and equitable. It also offers opportunities for learners to demonstrate professionalism in a virtual environment, to obtain a patient’s history incorporating interpersonal and communication skills, to interact with multiple parties during a patient encounter (patient, caregiver, translator, telepresenter, faculty member), to enhance physical examination techniques via videoconferencing, and ideally to optimize demonstrations of empathy through “webside manner.” Feedback and assessment, important features of training in any setting, must be timely, specific, and actionable in the new virtual care environment. Recognizing the importance of integrating virtual care into education, leaders from across the United States convened on September 10, 2020, for a symposium titled, “Crossing the Virtual Chasm: Rethinking Curriculum, Competency, and Culture in the Virtual Care Era.” In this article, the authors share recommendations that came out of this symposium for the implementation of educational tools in the evolving virtual care environment. They present core competencies, assessment tools, precepting workflows, and technology to optimize the delivery of high-quality virtual care that is safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered.

Abstract On July 24, 2020, a workshop sponsored by the National Brain Tumor Society was held on innovating brain tumor clinical trials based on lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience. Various stakeholders from the brain tumor community participated including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academic and community clinicians, researchers, industry, clinical research organizations, patients and patient advocates, and representatives from the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the National Cancer Institute. This report summarizes the workshop and proposes ways to incorporate lessons learned from COVID-19 to brain tumor clinical trials including the increased use of telemedicine and decentralized trial models as opportunities for practical innovation with potential long-term impact on clinical trial design and implementation.

Introduction Globally, the use of telestroke programmes for acute care is expanding. Currently, a standardised set of variables for enabling reliable international comparisons of telestroke programmes does not exist. The aim of the study was to establish a consensus-based, minimum dataset for acute telestroke to enable the reliable comparison of programmes, clinical management and patient outcomes. Methods An initial scoping review of variables was conducted, supplemented by reaching out to colleagues leading some of these programmes in different countries. An international expert panel of clinicians, researchers and managers ( n = 20) from the Australasia Pacific region, USA, UK and Europe was convened. A modified-Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus via online questionnaires, teleconferences and email. Results Overall, 533 variables were initially identified and harmonised into 159 variables for the expert panel to review. The final dataset included 110 variables covering three themes (service configuration, consultations, patient information) and 12 categories: (1) details about telestroke network/programme ( n = 12), (2) details about initiating hospital ( n = 10), (3) telestroke consultation ( n = 17), (4) patient characteristics ( n = 7), (5) presentation to hospital ( n = 5), (6) general clinical care within first 24 hours ( n = 10), (7) thrombolysis treatment ( n = 10), (8) endovascular treatment ( n = 13), (9) neurosurgery treatment ( n = 8), (10) processes of care beyond 24 hours ( n = 7), (11) discharge information ( n = 5), (12) post-discharge and follow-up data ( n = 6). Discussion The acute telestroke minimum dataset provides a recommended set of variables to systematically evaluate acute telestroke programmes in different countries. Adoption is recommended for new and existing services.

Background and Purpose— Kidney dysfunction is common among patients hospitalized for ischemic stroke. Understanding the association of kidney disease with poststroke outcomes is important to properly adjust for case mix in outcome studies, payment models and risk-standardized hospital readmission rates. Methods— In this cohort study of fee-for-service Medicare patients admitted with ischemic stroke to 1579 Get With The Guidelines-Stroke participating hospitals between 2009 and 2014, adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the independent associations of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and dialysis status with 30-day and 1-year postdischarge mortality and rehospitalizations. Results— Of 204 652 patients discharged alive (median age [25th–75th percentile] 80 years [73.0–86.0], 57.6% women, 79.8% white), 48.8% had an eGFR ≥60, 26.5% an eGFR 45 to 59, 16.3% an eGFR 30 to 44, 5.1% an eGFR 15 to 29, 0.6% an eGFR <15 without dialysis, and 2.8% were receiving dialysis. Compared with eGFR ≥60, and after adjusting for relevant variables, eGFR <45 was associated with increased 30-day mortality with the risk highest among those with eGFR <15 without dialysis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.09; 95% CI, 1.66–2.63). An eGFR <60 was associated with increased 1-year poststroke mortality that was highest among patients on dialysis (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 2.49–2.81). Dialysis was also associated with the highest 30-day and 1-year rehospitalization rates (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.95–2.26 and HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 2.44–2.66, respectively) and 30-day and 1-year composite of mortality and rehospitalization (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.90–2.18 and HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 2.36–2.56, respectively). Conclusions— Within the first year after index hospitalization for ischemic stroke, eGFR and dialysis status on admission are associated with poststroke mortality and hospital readmissions. Kidney function should be included in risk-stratification models for poststroke outcomes.

Background— We explored regional variation in 30-day ischemic stroke mortality and readmission rates and the extent to which regional differences in patients, hospitals, healthcare resources, and a quality of care composite care measure explain the observed variation. Methods and Results— This ecological analysis aggregated patient and hospital characteristics from the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke registry (2007–2011), healthcare resource data from the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care (2006), and Medicare fee-for-service data on 30-day mortality and readmissions (2007–2011) to the hospital referral region (HRR) level. We used linear regression to estimate adjusted HRR-level 30-day outcomes, to identify HRR-level characteristics associated with 30-day outcomes, and to describe which characteristics explained variation in 30-day outcomes. The mean adjusted HRR-level 30-day mortality and readmission rates were 10.3% (SD=1.1%) and 13.1% (SD=1.1%), respectively; a modest, negative correlation ( r =−0.17; P =0.003) was found between one another. Demographics explained more variation in readmissions than mortality (25% versus 6%), but after accounting for demographics, comorbidities accounted for more variation in mortality compared with readmission rates (17% versus 7%). The combination of hospital characteristics and healthcare resources explained 11% and 16% of the variance in mortality and readmission rates, beyond patient characteristics. Most of the regional variation in mortality (65%) and readmission (50%) rates remained unexplained. Conclusions— Thirty-day mortality and readmission rates vary substantially across HRRs and exhibit an inverse relationship. While regional variation in 30-day outcomes were explained by patient and hospital factors differently, much of the regional variation in both outcomes remains unexplained.

The healthcare system is undergoing a transition from paying for volume to paying for value. Clinicians, as well as public and private payers, are beginning to implement alternative delivery and payment models, such as the patient-centered medical home, accountable care organizations, and bundled payment arrangements. Implementation of these new models will necessitate delivery system transformation and will actively involve all fields of medical care, in particular medicine and surgery. This call to action, on behalf of the American Heart Association’s Expert Panel on Payment and Delivery System Reform, serves to offer support and direction for further involvement by the American Heart Association. In doing so, it (1) provides baseline review and definition of the present models and some of the early results of these delivery models, including outcomes; (2) initiates a conversation within the American Heart Association on the impact of payment and delivery system reform, as well as how the American Heart Association should engage in the interest of patients; (3) issues a call to action to our organization and to cardiovascular and stroke health professionals across the country to become educated about these models so to as to understand their impact on patient care; and (4) asks the government and other funding agencies, including the American Heart Association, to begin supporting and prioritizing meaningful research endeavors to further evaluate these models.