Back to Authors

Schaefer, Niklaus

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9732-7696

Mayo Clinic

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Citations 2

Abstract CT112: Phase I open-label, multi-center study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, dosimetry, and preliminary activity of FXX489 ([177Lu]Lu-NNS309) in patients with pancreatic, lung, breast and colorectal cancers
Geva, Ravit , Juneau, Daniel , Ferrario, Cristiano , Moradi, Farshad , Iravani, Amir , Ahnert, Jordi, Rúiz, I., Koessler, Thibaud, Ferrandiz, Aitana Calvo, Spéville, Bernard Doger de , Razak, Albiruni R. Abdul, Al-Mansour, Laure, Nienhuis, Hilde H. , Eiber, Matthias , Heuschkel, Martin, Geoffrey, J Lane, Origuchi, Shizuka, Couillebault, Xuan Mai, Garayoa, Elisa Garcı́a, Roopa, Jayarama Naidu, Straub, Christopher, Hainzl, Dominik, Chen, Xinyu , Yang, Fang , Pectasides, Eirini, Mancini, B.R. , Esfahani, Shadi A. , Ahnert, Jordi, Ruiz, Ivan Manuel Victoria, Ferrandiz, Aitana Calvo, Flamen, Patrick , Deandreis, Désirèe , Schaefer, Niklaus , Nagarajah, James , Maccauro, Marco , Filice, Angelina , Goldman, Jonathan W. , Hermann, Ken , Drzezga, Alexander E. , McConathy, Jonathan , Geoffrey, Johnson, Parent, Ephraim E. , Kuboki, Yasutoshi , Couillebault, Xuân-Mai

Cancer Research | April 25, 2025 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 8_Supplement_2 | Pages: CT112-CT112

10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-ct112 Get It

Abstract Background: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a type II integral membrane glycoprotein, highly expressed on the cell surface of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) present in the tumor microenvironment of most epithelial cancers and showing limited expression in normal tissues. Given this expression profile, FAP appears to be a promising target for radioligand therapy that has pan-cancer potential. [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 is a FAP-targeted radiopharmaceutical that shows improved tumor retention and demonstrates promising anti-tumor activity in translationally relevant preclinical models (e.g., PDAC, NSCLC) where FAP is expressed on CAFs. Methods: CFXX489A12101 (NCT06562192) is a first-in-human phase I, open-label, multi-center study of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer (BC), and colorectal cancer (CRC). The study includes a dose escalation part followed by a dose expansion part. Key eligibility criteria include prior treatment for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease and having all measurable lesions (per RECIST 1.1) showing [68Ga]Ga-NNS309 uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Patients who are eligible for treatment receive one dose of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 on day 1 of each cycle. A 6-week and a 4-week dosing schedule will be explored. Dosimetry data will be obtained from patients in the dose escalation part after the first dose and will be used to calculate the cumulative radiation exposure. Dose escalation will be guided by a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model with overdose control (EWOC) principle, and assessment of all relevant data available from all dose levels including safety, tolerability, clinical dosimetry, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy. Once the recommended dose(s) (RD) and schedule(s) of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 are determined, the expansion part may open and will include patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC (n∼20), locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (n∼20), HR+/HER2- ductal BC (n∼15), HR+/HER2- lobular BC (n∼15), and triple negative BC (; n∼24).The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 and to identify the RD(s) and regimen(s) of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 for further clinical evaluation. Secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the preliminary anti-tumor activity of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309, characterize the pharmacokinetics of [177Lu]Lu-NNS309 in blood and urine, the radiation dosimetry for organs and tumor lesions, and to evaluate the safety and imaging properties of [68Ga]Ga-NNS309. Conclusion: The study is currently enrolling in the dose escalation part. Citation Format: Ravit Geva, Daniel Juneau, Shadi Abdar Esfahani, Cristiano Ferrario, Farshad Moradi, Amir Iravani, Jordi Ahnert, Ivan Manuel Victoria Ruiz, Thibaud Koessler, Aitana Calvo Ferrandiz, Bernard Doger de Speville, Patrick Flamen, Albiruni Razak, Desiree Deandreis, Laure Al-Mansour, Niklaus Schaefer, James Nagarajah, Hilde Nienhuis, Marco Maccauro, Angelina Filice, Jonathan Goldman, Ken Herrmann, Matthias Eiber, Alexander Drzezga, Martin Heuschkel, Jonathan McConathy, Johnson Geoffrey, Ephraim Parent, Yasutoshi Kuboki, Shizuka Origuchi, Xuan Mai Couillebault, Elisa Garcia Garayoa, Jayarama Naidu Roopa, Christopher Straub, Dominik Hainzl, Xinyu Chen, Fang Yang, Eirini Pectasides, Brandon Mancini. Phase I open-label, multi-center study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, dosimetry, and preliminary activity of FXX489 ([177Lu]Lu-NNS309) in patients with pancreatic, lung, breast and colorectal cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT112.
Prospective validation of a new imaging scorecard to assess leptomeningeal metastasis: A joint EORTC BTG and RANO effort
Rhun, Émilie Le , Devos, Patrick , Winklhofer, Sebastian , Lmalem, Hafida, Brandsma, Dieta , Kumthekar, Priya , Castellano, Antonella , Compter, Annette , Dhermain, F., Franceschi, Enrico , Gempt, Jens , Hattingen, Elke , Hempel, Johann, Lukacova, Slávka , Minniti, Giuseppe , O’Brien, Barbara , Postma, Tjeerd J., Roth, Patrick , Schaefer, Niklaus , Thust, Steffi, Bent, Martin J. van den , Hoorn, Anouk van der , Vogin, Guillaume , Smits, Marion , Jaeckle, Kurt A. , Preusser, Matthias , Glantz, Michael , Wen, Patrick Y. , Weller, Michael , Le Rhun, Emilie , Gállego Pérez-Larraya, Jaime , Snijders, Tom J , Smits, Marion , Jaeckle, Kurt A , Preusser, Matthias , Weller, Michael , van den Bent, Martin J , Franceschi, Enrico , Roth, Patrick , Forsyth, Peter A , Furtner, Julia , Galldiks, Norbert , Rudà, Roberta , Schmidt, Nils Ole , Thust, Stefanie Catherine , Tonn, Joerg-Christian , Wen, Patrick Yung , Bendszus, Martin

Neuro-Oncology | February 11, 2022 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1726-1735

10.1093/neuonc/noac043 Get It

Abstract Background Validation of the 2016 RANO MRI scorecard for leptomeningeal metastasis failed for multiple reasons. Accordingly, this joint EORTC Brain Tumor Group and RANO effort sought to prospectively validate a revised MRI scorecard for response assessment in leptomeningeal metastasis. Methods Coded paired cerebrospinal MRI of 20 patients with leptomeningeal metastases from solid cancers at baseline and follow-up after treatment and instructions for assessment were provided via the EORTC imaging platform. The Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the interobserver pairwise agreement. Results Thirty-five raters participated, including 9 neuroradiologists, 17 neurologists, 4 radiation oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons, and 2 medical oncologists. Among single leptomeningeal metastases-related imaging findings at baseline, the best median concordance was noted for hydrocephalus (Kappa = 0.63), and the worst median concordance for spinal linear enhancing disease (Kappa = 0.46). The median concordance of raters for the overall response assessment was moderate (Kappa = 0.44). Notably, the interobserver agreement for the presence of parenchymal brain metastases at baseline was fair (Kappa = 0.29) and virtually absent for their response to treatment. 394 of 700 ratings (20 patients x 35 raters, 56%) were fully completed. In 308 of 394 fully completed ratings (78%), the overall response assessment perfectly matched the summary interpretation of the single ratings as proposed in the scorecard instructions. Conclusion This study confirms the principle utility of the new scorecard, but also indicates the need for training of MRI assessment with a dedicated reviewer panel in clinical trials. Electronic case report forms with “blocking options” may be required to enforce completeness and quality of scoring.