Anisetti, Bhrugun

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between Framingham Stroke Risk Profile (FSRP) score and rate of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) progression and cognition. Methods: Consecutive patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Florida Familial Cerebrovascular Diseases Registry (2011-2020) with 2 brain-MRI scans at least 1 year apart were included. The primary outcome was annual change in WMH volume (cm3/year) stratified as fast versus slow (above vs. below median). Cognition was assessed using a Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE, 0-30). FSRP score (0 to 8) was calculated by summing the presence of age 65 years or older, smoking, systolic blood pressure greater than 130 mmHg, diabetes, coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, and antihypertensive medication use. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between FSRP and WMH progression, and cognition. Results: In all, 207 patients were included, with a mean age of 60±16 y and 54.6% female. FSRP scores risk distribution was: 31.9% scored 0 to 1, 36.7% scored 2 to 3, and 31.4% scored ≥4. The baseline WMH volume was 9.6 cm3 (IQR: 3.3-28.4 cm3), and the annual rate of WMH progression was 0.9 cm3/year (IQR: 0.1 to 3.1 cm3/year). A higher FSRP score was associated with fast WMH progression (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI: 1.22-1.72; P<0.001) and a lower MMSE score (23.6 vs. 27.1; P<0.001). There was a dose-dependent relationship between higher FSRP score and fast WMH progression (odds ratios, 2.20, 4.64, 7.86, 8.03 for FSRP scores 1, 2, 3, and ≥4, respectively; trend P<0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrated an association between higher FSRP scores and accelerated WMH progression, as well as lower cognition.

Introduction: Collateral cerebrovasculature is important for the survival of penumbral tissue in patients with large vessel occlusive (LVO) stroke, and adequate collateralization is associated with favorable outcomes. The presence of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) have been implicated in vessel wall remodeling and impaired vasoreactivity. We investigated whether the presence of deep and/or lobar CMB predicts poor collateral recruitment in patients with LVO stroke who underwent thrombectomy (MT). Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center study of adults who presented with LVO stroke and had MT between January 2012-June 2020. CT angiography of head prior to MT was used to assess collateral status with poor status defined as ≤50% filling and good status as >50% filling. CMBs were assessed using T2*-weighted gradient echo or susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance images. Location of CMB was further characterized as deep vs. lobar using consensus definitions. Poor stroke outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥3 at 90 days. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the associations between CMB, CMB types (lobar, deep, lobar+deep) and poor collaterals after adjusting for vascular risk factors. Results: Consecutive 151 subjects were included (mean age 68±15 years, 47% women), with a median NIHSS of 18. CMB were identified in 57 subjects (37.4%). Of these, 20.5% had lobar CMB, 5.3% had deep CMB and 11.9% had combined lobar & deep CMB. Patients with CMB had higher odds of having poor collaterals compared to those without CMB (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.23, P=0.015). The association of CMB with poor collaterals was strongest in patients with combined lobar & deep CMB (OR 4.78, 95% CI 1.43-15.93, P=0.011), compared with those with exclusively deep CMB (OR 2.78, 95% CI 0.44-17.62, P=0.278) or lobar CMB (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.19-1.38, P=0.188). Patients with poor collaterals were more likely to have poor outcome compared with those with good collaterals (48.4% vs. 31.0%, P=0.03). Conclusion: Cerebral microbleeds are independently associated with poor collateral recruitment when adjusted for traditional vascular risk factors. Further study is warranted to elucidate the differential effects of CMB types on collateral recruitment.

Background and Objectives: It is unclear whether induced hypertension in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) may improve long-term outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of induced hypertension vs standard medical care in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset. Methods: Two reviewers systematically searched PubMed using the prespecified terms “induced hypertension” or “blood pressure augmentation” plus “ischemic stroke” for clinical trials that reported functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. The safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI across trials were synthesized using fixed-effect model based on Mantel-Haenszel methods. Forest plots were constructed. Results: Three clinical trials with 270 AIS patients treated with induced hypertension (n=126) or standard medical care (n= 144) were included. Mean age was 66.6 years, 35.2% were women, and the mean initial NIHSS was 7.5. The rate of functional independence at 90 days was higher in patients treated with induced hypertension (70.6%) versus control (54.9%) (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.13-3.11; p=0.01). sICH did not differ between patients treated with induced hypertension (<1%) versus control (<1%) (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.14-7.45; p=0.98). Discussion: Among patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with 72 hours of symptoms onset, induced hypertension resulted in better functional outcome at 90 days than standard medical care and did not increase risk of sICH. Large RCTs to test this observation are ongoing and needed to guide clinical practice.