Chen, Zejia

Purpose Rapid identification of hematoma expansion (HE) risk at baseline is a priority in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients and may impact clinical decision making. Predictive scores using clinical features and Non-Contract Computed Tomography (NCCT)-based features exist, however, the extent to which each feature set contributes to identification is limited. This paper aims to investigate the relative value of clinical, radiological, and radiomics features in HE prediction. Methods Original data was retrospectively obtained from three major prospective clinical trials [“Spot Sign” Selection of Intracerebral Hemorrhage to Guide Hemostatic Therapy (SPOTLIGHT)NCT01359202; The Spot Sign for Predicting and Treating ICH Growth Study (STOP-IT)NCT00810888] Patients baseline and follow-up scans following ICH were included. Clinical, NCCT radiological, and radiomics features were extracted, and multivariate modeling was conducted on each feature set. Results 317 patients from 38 sites met inclusion criteria. Warfarin use (p=0.001) and GCS score (p=0.046) were significant clinical predictors of HE. The best performing model for HE prediction included clinical, radiological, and radiomic features with an area under the curve (AUC) of 87.7%. NCCT radiological features improved upon clinical benchmark model AUC by 6.5% and a clinical & radiomic combination model by 6.4%. Addition of radiomics features improved goodness of fit of both clinical (p=0.012) and clinical & NCCT radiological (p=0.007) models, with marginal improvements on AUC. Inclusion of NCCT radiological signs was best for ruling out HE whereas the radiomic features were best for ruling in HE. Conclusion NCCT-based radiological and radiomics features can improve HE prediction when added to clinical features.

Introduction: Development of new intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) within 24 hours of presentation or expansion of 1mL or more independently predicts poor outcome. Current methods for IVH volume estimation lack sufficient precision to detect this level of change. The best method of quantification with manual/semi-automated segmentation remain clinically impractical. We aimed to train and validate a convolutional neural network (CNN) to autonomously segment and quantify IVH volume in acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients. Methods: Imaging data for training and validation was obtained from 3 international multicenter studies. IVH volumes were assessed using CNN, IVH Score (IVHS), Original Graeb Score (oGS), Modified Graeb Score (mGS), and manual segmentation using ITK-SNAP. Agreement between CNN volume and IVHS estimated volume compared to manual segmentation was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman charts. Accuracy of CNN segmentation was compared to manual segmentation with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Accuracy of hematoma expansion detection was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: A total of 172 patients and 311 CT scans were included. Intra-rater reliability was significantly greater for CNN versus IVHS method (ICC 0.99 [95%CI 0.99 - 1.00] vs 0.76 [95%CI 0.66 - 0.83]). Accuracy of CNN segmentation was satisfactory (DSC 0.76 [95%CI 0.75 - 0.78]). Accuracy of hematoma expansion detection was substantially greater in CNN (AUC 0.91 [95%CI 0.85 - 0.97]) versus IVHS, oGS and mGS. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that a fully automated CNN algorithm is capable of segmenting IVH volumes on multi-center data with higher intra-rater reliability and satisfactory accuracy over the current methods of IVH volume measurement tools. The algorithm has proven to be capable of detecting hematoma expansion with substantially greater accuracy over existing methods of IVH measurement.