Hammers, Dustin B.

AbstractObjectiveThe Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) seeks to provide comprehensive understanding of early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD; onset <65 years), with the current study profiling baseline clinical, cognitive, biomarker, and genetic characteristics of the cohort nearing the data‐collection mid‐point.MethodsData from 371 LEADS participants were compared based on diagnostic group classification (cognitively normal [n = 89], amyloid‐positive EOAD [n = 212], and amyloid‐negative early‐onset non‐Alzheimer's disease [EOnonAD; n = 70]).ResultsCognitive performance was worse for EOAD than other groups, and EOAD participants were apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 homozygotes at higher rates. An amnestic presentation was common among impaired participants (81%), with several clinical phenotypes present. LEADS participants generally consented at high rates to optional trial procedures.ConclusionsWe present the most comprehensive baseline characterization of sporadic EOAD in the United States to date. EOAD presents with widespread cognitive impairment within and across clinical phenotypes, with differences in APOE ε4 allele carrier status appearing to be relevant.HIGHLIGHTS Findings represent the most comprehensive baseline characterization of sporadic early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) to date. Cognitive impairment was widespread for EOAD participants and more severe than other groups. EOAD participants were homozygous apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 carriers at higher rates than the EOnonAD group. Amnestic presentation predominated in EOAD and EOnonAD participants, but other clinical phenotypes were present.

AbstractOBJECTIVEInvestigation of learning slopes in early‐onset dementias has been limited. The current study aimed to highlight the sensitivity of learning slopes to discriminate disease severity in cognitively normal participants and those diagnosed with early‐onset dementia with and without β‐amyloid positivityMETHODData from 310 participants in the Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (aged 41 to 65) were used to calculate learning slope metrics. Learning slopes among diagnostic groups were compared, and the relationships of slopes with standard memory measures were determinedRESULTSWorse learning slopes were associated with more severe disease states, even after controlling for demographics, total learning, and cognitive severity. A particular metric—the learning ratio (LR)—outperformed other learning slope calculations across analysesCONCLUSIONSLearning slopes appear to be sensitive to early‐onset dementias, even when controlling for the effect of total learning and cognitive severity. The LR may be the learning measure of choice for such analyses.Highlights Learning is impaired in amyloid‐positive EOAD, beyond cognitive severity scores alone. Amyloid‐positive EOAD participants perform worse on learning slopes than amyloid‐negative participants. Learning ratio appears to be the learning metric of choice for EOAD participants.

AbstractBackgroundPreviously, we found that female sex is associated with greater pathology burden in early‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) in the Longitudinal EOAD Study (LEADS). Here, we have expanded our analyses by adding APOE‐ε4 carrier status as a further predictor of EOAD pathologic burden.MethodWe included 180 EOAD LEADS participants with available APOE genotype, Flortaucipir PET, Florbetaben PET, and MRI data. Demographic and biomarker differences were analyzed using ANOVA. EOAD participants were split by sex and APOE‐ε4 carrier status. Box plots were created in R and a voxel‐wise multiple linear regression in SPM12 yielded statistical brain maps of gray matter density (GMD), amyloid and tau burden.ResultCompared to males, EOAD females showed significantly greater global amyloid uptake (mean SUVR, p=0.002) and greater tau SUVR in the MetaROI, Braak 3&4 and 5&6 regions (p=0.0007, p=0.001, p=0.01, resp., Table 1). Female APOE‐ε4 carriers showed greater tau SUVR in Braak regions 1&2 than female non‐carriers (p<0.01, Figure 2B). Male APOE‐ε4 carriers showed trend‐level thinner entorhinal cortex than male non‐carriers (p=0.06, Figure 1). Interestingly however, femaleAPOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed greater global amyloid SUVR than female carriers (p<0.01, Figure 2A). Further, APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed significantly thinner medial temporal cortices than carriers in both sexes (M, p<0.05; F, p<0.01). Male APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers also showed significantly lower mean cortical thickness than male carriers (p<0.05, Figure 1). Female APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed trend‐level lower mean cortical thickness than female carriers (p=0.06, Figure 1). The FWE corrected SPM12 maps showed significantly greater GM atrophy in the right temporal lobe and greater amyloid burden in a right lateralized occipitoparietal pattern in female APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers compared to female carriers. Further, male APOE‐ε4 non‐carriers showed greater tau uptake in the left frontal lobe than male carriers (Figure 3).ConclusionThese results suggest that APOE‐ε4 non‐carrier status is associated with greater atrophy, amyloid and tau deposition in EOAD. This might be due to the presence of other strong genetic drivers of disease pathology in EOAD.

AbstractBackgroundElevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are risk factors for white matter (WM) injury associated with cognitive decline and dementia. White matter hyperintensities (WMH) on MRI, markers of WM injury, increase with aging and are more common in women than in men after the age of 60. We examined SBP and DBP in relation to WMH volume and diffusion MRI measures of WM integrity in postmenopausal women.MethodWomen (n=144) with median age of 67 (range 58‐72) and of good cardiovascular health who were previously enrolled in the multi‐site randomized clinical trial, Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS), participated in the present observational KEEPS Continuation Study. SBP, DBP, and MRI data were collected approximately 9 years after the end of KEEPS menopausal hormones versus placebo 4‐year interventions. WM integrity was assessed with WMH volume measurements (log transformed) on structural MRI and with measures of WM microstructure on diffusion MRI. Multiple linear regression analyses, adjusted for age, were used to test for associations of SBP and DBP with MRI measures.ResultThe median SBP was 128 (range 86‐180) and DBP was 77 (range 47‐106). Higher SBP (r=0.332;p=0.015) and DBP (r=0.346;p=0.007) were associated with higher WMH volumes. Among the WM tracts, higher SBP was associated with lower fractional anisotropy (FA) in lateral orbitofrontal gyrus WM (r=0.198;p=0.039) and sagittal stratum (r=0.226;p=0.043), and higher DBP was associated with lower FA in the superior occipital gyrus WM (r=0.370;p=0.045). Higher SBP and DBP were associated with higher mean diffusivity (MD) in the external capsule [(r=0.311;p=0.007);(r=375;p<0.001)] and the fronto‐occipital fasciculus [(r=0.286;p=0.016); (r=0.303;p=0.008)]. Furthermore, higher DBP was associated with higher MD in the anterior corona radiata (r=0.233;p=0.039), internal capsule (r=0.303;p=0.042), and the middle (r=0.275; p=0.03) and superior frontal gyrus (r=0.269;p=0.03) WM.ConclusionElevated SBP and DBP measurements are associated with greater WM injury in postmenopausal women. In particular, the frontal lobe WM and its connecting tracts may be more vulnerable to elevation in SBP and DBP. Whether BP control reduces the risk for WM injury, a risk factor for dementia, in post‐menopausal women warrants study.