Citations 13
Association of Year of Surgery and Carotid Stenting Outcomes in High-risk Patients, 2015-2021
Stonko, David P. , Bose, Sanuja , Keegan, Alana , Stonko, David P , McDermott, Katherine M. , Morrison, Jonathan J. , Hicks, Caitlin W.
JAMA Surgery | April 12, 2023 | Volume: 158 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 768
This cohort study quantifies the yearly trends and outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization vs transfemoral carotid artery stenting among high-risk patients from 2015 to 2021.
Exploring Intra-arterial Contrast Administration for Intraoperative Imaging Using a Swine Model
Poe, Kelly, Stonko, David P. , Edwards, Joseph , Morrison, Jonathan J. , Morrison, Jonathan J , Stonko, David P , Treffalls, Rebecca N. , Abdou, Hossam , DeMartino, Randall R. , Ptak, Thomas
Angiology | February 8, 2023 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 833-840
Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging with endovascular delivery of intra-arterial (IA) contrast could potentially provide higher attenuation with lower contrast volumes than intravenous (IV) administration. We aimed to compare IA and IV contrast use for organ-specific CT abdominal imaging. Five anesthetized swine had external jugular and brachial artery access with ascending aortic pigtail placement. An IV protocol was 100 mL at 5 mL/sec over 20 sec vs 50 mL of IA contrast at 5 mL/sec over 10 sec. Region-of-interest markers were applied to anatomical regions to measure attenuation (HU) over time. IA and IV contrast protocols achieved adequate aortic opacification (IA, 455 ± 289 vs IV, 450 ± 114 HU). The IA contrast aortic attenuation curve reached peak attenuation compared with IV contrast (IA, 8 vs 23 sec; P < .001). Time to peak attenuation was similar between IA and IV contrast in the portal vein (IA, 38 vs IV, 42 sec, P = .25). IA administration achieved a superior contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in less time compared with IV (R 2 = .94; P < .001). IA contrast achieved adequate opacification with less bolus broadening and a superior CNR compared with IV contrast while using a smaller contrast volume for directed organ-directed imaging.
Five Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Risk: Results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Gaudet, Mia M., Cox, Angela , Camp, Nicola J. , Goode, Ellen L. , Humphreys, Manjeet K., Dunning, Alison M. , Giles, Graham G. , Severi, Gianluca , Baglietto, Laura , English, Dallas R. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Flesch‐Janys, Dieter, Abbas, Sascha, Salazar, Ramona, Mannermaa, Arto, Kataja, Vesa , Kosma, Veli-Matti, Lindblom, Annika , Margolin, Sara , Heikkinen, Tuomas , Kämpjärvi, Kati, Aaltonen, Kirsimari, Nevanlinna, Heli , Bogdanova, Natalia , Coinac, Irina, Schürmann, Peter , Dörk, Thilo , Bartram, Claus R., Schmutzler, Rita K., Tchatchou, Sandrine, Burwinkel, Barbara , Brauch, Hiltrud , Torres, Diana , Hamann, Ute, Justenhoven, Christina , Ribas, Gloría , Flyger, Henrik L., Peto, Julian , Fletcher, Olivia , Johnson, Nichola , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Fasching, Peter A. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Strick, Reiner , Ekici, Arif B. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Leeuwen, Flora E. van , Veer, Laura J. van’t , Southey, Melissa C. , Hopper, John L. , Apicella, Carmel, Haiman, Christopher A., Henderson, Brian E., Kolonel, Laurence N. , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Alnæs, Grethe Grenaker, Hunter, David J. , Cox, David G. , Hankinson, Susan E. , Seynaeve, Caroline, Tollenaar, Rob A.�E.�M. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Brinton, Louise A. , Pepłońska, Beata , Czene, Kamila , Li, Yuqing , Liu, Jianjun , Balasubramanian, Sabapathy P. , Rafii, Saeed , Reed, Malcolm , Pooley, Karen A. , Conroy, Don, Baynes, Caroline, Kang, Daehee , Yoo, Keun-Young, Noh, Dong‐Young , Ahn, Sei-Hyun, Shen, Chen‐Yang , Wang, Hui‐Chun , Yu, Jyh-Cherng, Wu, Pei-Ei, Ziogoas, Argyrios, Egan, Kathleen M. , Titus‐Ernstoff, Linda, Dietz, Amy Trentham, Sigurdson, Alice J., Bhatti, Parveen , Allen‐Brady, Kristina , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Wong, Jathine , Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Beesley, Jonathan, Easton, Doug , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Thorne, Heather , Li, Yuqing , Milne, Roger L. , Morrison, Jonathan J. , Couch, Fergus J. , Olson, Janet E. , Wang, Xianshu , Mannermaa, Arto, Arias, José Ignacio , Benı́tez, Javier , Bojesen, Stig E. , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Flyger, Henrik, Broeks, Annegien , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Kraft, Peter , Vreeswijk, Maaike P.G. , Devilee, Peter , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Hall, Per N , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Newcomb, Polly A. , Alexander, Bruce H. , Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Nevanlinna, H , Dörk, Thilo , Giles, Graham G , Spurdle, Amanda B , Lissowska, Jolanta , Southey, Melissa C , English, Dallas R , Cannon-Albright, Lisa A , Dunning, Alison M , Cox, Angela , Torres, Diana , García-Closas, Montserrat , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Severi, Gianluca , Ekici, Arif B , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Bhatti, Parveen , Czene, Kamila , Rafii, Saeed , Baglietto, Laura , Fletcher, Olivia , Brauch, Hiltrud , Lindblom, Annika , Liu, Jing , Kang, Daehee
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | May 7, 2009 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1610-1616
Abstract Previous studies have suggested that minor alleles for ERCC4 rs744154, TNF rs361525, CASP10 rs13010627, PGR rs1042838, and BID rs8190315 may influence breast cancer risk, but the evidence is inconclusive due to their small sample size. These polymorphisms were genotyped in more than 30,000 breast cancer cases and 30,000 controls, primarily of European descent, from 30 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) as a measure of association. We found that the minor alleles for these polymorphisms were not related to invasive breast cancer risk overall in women of European descent: ECCR4 per-allele OR (95% CI) = 0.99 (0.97-1.02), minor allele frequency = 27.5%; TNF 1.00 (0.95-1.06), 5.0%; CASP10 1.02 (0.98-1.07), 6.5%; PGR 1.02 (0.99-1.06), 15.3%; and BID 0.98 (0.86-1.12), 1.7%. However, we observed significant between-study heterogeneity for associations with risk for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in CASP10, PGR, and BID. Estimates were imprecise for women of Asian and African descent due to small numbers and lower minor allele frequencies (with the exception of BID SNP). The ORs for each copy of the minor allele were not significantly different by estrogen or progesterone receptor status, nor were any significant interactions found between the polymorphisms and age or family history of breast cancer. In conclusion, our data provide persuasive evidence against an overall association between invasive breast cancer risk and ERCC4 rs744154, TNF rs361525, CASP10 rs13010627, PGR rs1042838, and BID rs8190315 genotypes among women of European descent. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(5):1610–6)