Wolff, Bruce G.

Diverticular disease, and particularly diverticulitis, has an increasing incidence in Westernized countries because of low-fiber diet. Diverticular disease may be classified as asymptomatic, atypical, acute or uncomplicated, and complicated. Conservative or medical management is usually indicated for acute or uncomplicated diverticulitis, with elective surgical resection generally being recommended after two documented episodes. Complicated diverticulitis, because of the high rate of recurrent problems, is generally managed promptly with sigmoid resection. Sigmoid resection for diverticulitis, under appropriate circumstances, has one of the highest success rates of any of the common gastrointestinal procedures.

Multimodal fast-track (FT) pathways for both open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery have been shown to improve gastrointestinal recovery, shorten length of stay, and decrease morbidity. The aim of our study was to determine if using alvimopan (Entereg)™ in the setting of a FT minimally invasive colorectal pathway is beneficial and cost-effective. All minimally invasive colorectal surgeries performed by one surgeon using a multimodal FT pathway with and without alvimopan were reviewed. Ninety total patients were identified, 64 patients treated without and 26 with alvimopan. Main outcomes included postoperative day tolerating a soft diet, return of gastrointestinal function, length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, and patient care, anesthesia, pharmacy, and combined cost. Tolerance of a soft diet, return of gastrointestinal function, and length of stay were all shorter and showed significance in the alvimopan group (mean 2.1 vs 2.8 days, mean 1.5 vs 2.4 days, and mean 3.5 vs 4.5 days, respectively) ( P = 0.0197, P = 0.0029, and 0.0158, respectively). Patient care and combined hospital costs were both increased in the nonalvimopan group; however, combined hospital costs was not significant ( P = 0.0216 and P = 0.0875, respectively). The 30-day readmission rate of 6.3 per cent was also not significant in this group ( P = 0.0941). Patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery treated with a multimodal FT pathway tolerated a soft diet sooner, had earlier return of bowel function, a shorter length of stay, and lower patient care and combined costs when alvimopan was used.

535 Background: The most effective management of locally recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) is resection. This is also true for hepatic metastases (HM). Data remains limited, however, regarding concomitant resection of recurrent CRC and HM. The aims of this study were to determine the feasibility, safety and outcomes in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing concomitant resection of recurrent CRC with HM. Methods: All patients who underwent resection of recurrent CRC from 1/1995 to 1/2007 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester were reviewed (n=406). The study group consisted of patients who underwentconcomitant resection of locally recurrent CRC and hepatic resection for metastatic CRC (n= 45). Kaplan-Meier Survival was used to estimate DFS and OS. Results: The study group consisted of 27 men and 18 women. The median age was 59 years. Surgical management involved pelvic dissection in 43 patients and ileotransverse colectomy in two. 17 patients required resection of contiguous organs. 24 patients received intra-operative radiation. 34 patients underwent multiple hepatic wedge resections, 6 patients segmentectomy, 3 left hepatectomy, and 2 right hepatectomy. There was no perioperative mortality. Morbidity was 37%, 2 patients required re-operation. The 1, 3, and 5 year DFS was 72.2, 42.3, and 18.5%, respectively. The 1, 3, and 5 year OS was 87.7, 47.6, and 36.2%, respectively. Conclusions: Synchronous resection of locally recurrent CRC and HM is safe and feasible; morbidity is reasonable and mortality zero. DFS and OS in this patient population appear comparable to that of patients undergoing separate, staged resections.

BackgroundSynchronous colon cancers, defined as two or more primary colon cancer detected simultaneously at the time of initial diagnosis, account for up to 5% of all colon cancer diagnoses. Management principles and outcomes remain largely undefined.MethodsA retrospective institutional review of patients undergoing curative intent resection for colon adenocarcinoma (Stages I–III) from 1995 to 2007 was performed. Hereditary causes or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. Matching was performed and Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival.ResultsOf 2,387 patients, 100 (4.2%) had synchronous cancers. Patients with synchronous lesions tended to be older (median 77 vs. 72 years, P < 0.001) with more advanced tumors (41.0% vs. 31.4% Stage III, P = 0.04). After matching, there were no differences in demographics or tumor factors (all P > 0.05). Compared to solitary, synchronous cancers demonstrated an inferior 10‐year overall survival (53.9% vs. 36.5%, P = 0.009). Subset analysis of patients with synchronous cancers showed no difference in overall survival between those with extended versus segmental resections at 120‐months (P = 0.07).ConclusionSynchronous colon cancer is associated with decreased overall survival compared to patients with solitary tumors. Extended resection does not confer a survival benefit in these patients. Further research is needed to determine how to mitigate the poor outcomes. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:80–85. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

AbstractBackgroundThis study evaluated the impact of tumor regression grading (TRG) and other pathologic variates in a cohort of rectal carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The value of a grading less than pCR for predicting survival is unknown. Tumor budding has not been systematically studied in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.MethodsPathologic risk factors for survival were evaluated on surgical specimens of 237 patients with stages I, II, and III rectal cancer treated between 1996 and 2006. All patients underwent preoperative CRT followed by surgical resection 6–8 weeks later. TRG, tumor grade, budding, venous invasion, radial margin, and nodal status were evaluated. The prognostic value of TRG categories was calculated with Cox regression models and validated with resampling methods.ResultsTRG of <25% occurred in 61 (25.7%) and a complete response in 39 (16.4%) of the resected specimens. TRG of <25% was shown to be a statistically significant predictor for cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) compared to TRG ≥25% (P = 0.013). Tumor budding was present in 24 (10.1%) of the patients and was negatively associated with CSS (P = 0.013). Lymph node involvement was observed in 83 (35.0%) patients. TRG and nodal status (P < 0.001) were the most significant predictors associated with outcome.ConclusionPartial pathologic response ≥25% was a superior predictor compared to pCR for improved survival after preoperative CRT. CSS and RFS were adversely affected by the presence of lymph node metastases.

AbstractPurposeWe assessed risk factors for splenic injury during colectomy and associated outcomes for a 15‐year period at a single institution.MethodsAll adult general surgery patients who sustained a splenic injury during colectomy at our institution from 1992 to 2007 were retrospectively identified and matched 1:1 to controls without splenic injury. Putative risk factors were assessed using paired univariate analysis and conditional logistic regression. Differences in short‐ and long‐term mortality were assessed using the log‐rank test. Results are reported as a proportion, median, or odds ratio [OR (95% confidence intervals)].ResultsA total of 118 patients were included: 59 patients with splenic injury and 59 control patients. Statistically significant risk factors for splenic injury during colectomy found on univariate analysis included: splenic flexure mobilization, OR 21.00 (2.82–156.12); Charlson comorbidity index ≥5, OR 3.17 (1.26–7.93); ASA class ≥3, OR 5.33 (1.55–18.3); and nonelective surgery, OR 5.00 (1.1–22.82). On multivariate analysis, only splenic flexure mobilization was independently associated with increased risk of splenic injury (OR 18.4 (2.1–161); p = 0.0085). Splenic injured patients trended toward decrease survival both at 30 days (98 vs. 88%; p = 0.06) and at 5 years (58 vs. 55%), with a hazard ratio of 1.6 (1.0, 2.6; p = 0.05).ConclusionsSplenic flexure mobilization is the primary risk factor for splenic injury during colectomy, independent of other factors, such as higher ASA class, Charlson score, and nonelective surgery. Splenic injury during colectomy has an increased risk of death in both the short‐ and long‐term.

AbstractBackgroundA pooled post hoc responder analysis was performed to assess the clinical benefit of alvimopan, a peripherally acting mu‐opioid receptor (PAM‐OR) antagonist, for the management of postoperative ileus after bowel resection.MethodsAdult patients who underwent laparotomy for bowel resection scheduled for opioid‐based intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia received oral alvimopan or placebo preoperatively and twice daily postoperatively until hospital discharge or for 7 postoperative days. The proportion of responders and numbers needed to treat (NNT) were examined on postoperative days (POD) 3–8 for GI‐2 recovery (first bowel movement, toleration of solid food) and hospital discharge order (DCO) written.ResultsAlvimopan significantly increased the proportion of patients with GI‐2 recovery and DCO written by each POD (P < 0.001 for all). More patients who received alvimopan achieved GI‐2 recovery on or before POD 5 (alvimopan, 80%; placebo, 66%) and DCO written before POD 7 (alvimopan, 87%; placebo, 72%), with corresponding NNTs equal to 7.ConclusionsOn each POD analyzed, alvimopan significantly increased the proportion of patients who achieved GI‐2 recovery and DCO written versus placebo and was associated with relatively low NNTs. The results of these analyses provide additional characterization and support for the overall clinical benefit of alvimopan in patients undergoing bowel resection.

AbstractWide dissection of adenocarcinoma of the rectum is difficult because of the fixed structure of the anatomic pelvis. The role of lateral margins, excision of the mesorectum, and extended lymphadenectomy have recently received much attention in the literature in dealing surgically with more advanced rectal carcinomas. The basic question to be resolved in the future is whether additional radical surgery is of more benefit than adjuvant chemoradiation therapy in this setting.

AbstractPer anal excision is suitable for rectal carcinoma that is <3 cm and has not invaded into the muscular layer of the rectum. The upper margin of the lesion should not be >7 cm from the anal verge. The entire lesion is excised in its full thickness with a 1.5 cm to 2 cm normal margin, using electrocautery. It is important that the specimen is carefully examined by the pathologist for completeness of the excision and grade of the carcinoma. Abdominoperineal resection should be considered in good risk patients if adequate margins cannot be achieved and if the carcinoma is a high pathologic grade.