Abstract B065: Loss of SMARCA4 leads to intron retention and generation of tumor-associated antigens in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type
Abstract Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is a rare, deadly form of ovarian cancer that uniformly harbors mutations in SMARCA4, a member of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. SWI/SNF impacts RNA splicing, and dysregulation of splicing can generate immunogenic tumor antigens. Here, we explored the relationship between SMARCA4 loss and RNA splicing dysregulation. SCCOHT primary tumors harbored tumor-associated outlier splicing events compared to normal tissues. Many of the tumor events were retained introns encoding novel peptides predicted to bind to MHC-I complexes. Immune cells were observed in primary SCCOHT tumors, suggesting a potentially immune reactive tumor microenvironment. Mutations in several SWI/SNF subunits were associated with higher rates of outlier retained introns across tumor types in TCGA data. Interestingly, RNA sequencing of isogenic SCCOHT cell lines demonstrated a role for SMARCA4 in intron retention. Distinct protein-protein interactions between splicing factors identified in SCCOHT cell lines supported a role for SMARCA4 in splicing regulation. Further, SWI/SNF localized to genes which were differentially spliced. Mass spectrometry analyses confirmed expression of some of these novel peptides and a subset of these are predicted to bind to MHC-I complexes. A pool of these novel peptides derived from retained introns in SCCOHT triggered proliferation and expression of TNFa and INFb in primary human T cells. Together, these data suggest that SMARCA4 loss in SCCOHT leads to intron retention. Furthermore, T cell activation by novel peptides encoded by these tumor-specific splicing events suggests intron retention could be a source of tumor-associated antigens in SCCOHT. Citation Format: Elizabeth Raupach, Apurva Hegde, Krystine Garcia-Masnfield, Marice Alcantara, David Rose, Rebecca Halperin, Krystal Orlando, Jessica Lang, Ritin Sharma, Victoria David-Dirgo, Salvatore Facista, Rayvon Moore, Rochelle Kofman, Zoe Jensen, Victoria Zismann, Anthony Karnezis, Yemin Wang, Lynda Bennett, Timothy Whitsett, Marcin Kortylewski, William Hendricks, David Huntsman, Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Bernard Weissman, Jeffrey Trent, Patrick Pirrotte. Loss of SMARCA4 leads to intron retention and generation of tumor-associated antigens in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2025 Sep 19-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl):Abstract nr B065.
Safety and efficacy of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy in appendiceal and colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: A first-in-US phase I study.
125 Background: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) is being evaluated as a novel minimally invasive palliative treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM). Prior studies have established the feasibility and safety of repeated PIPAC treatments in gastrointestinal and gynecologic cancers. The goal of the present phase 1 trial was to establish the safety and feasibility of PIPAC oxaliplatin in a highly chemotherapy refractory colorectal and appendiceal cancer patient population. Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven peritoneal metastases from colorectal or appendiceal cancer underwent up to three PIPAC treatments using oxaliplatin (92 mg/m2) with a six-week interval at two academic centers. Patients with bowel obstruction, extra-peritoneal metastases, or poor performance status (ECOG>2) were excluded. PIPAC was nebulized over 5 min with a 30 min aerosol dwell time. Apart from the first PIPAC cycle, the patients also received a sensitizing dose of 5FU/LV (400mg/m2) within 24 hours of the procedure. Primary end point was safety as assessed by dose limiting toxicities within 6 weeks of the first PIPAC. Secondary endpoints included safety with the addition of 5FU/LV, efficacy, surgical morbidity, technical failure rate, progression-free and overall survival, pharmacokinetics (PK), and quality of life assessment. Results: A total of 8 patients were included: 5 colorectal; and 3 appendiceal. Median number of prior chemotherapy cycles was 2 (Interquartile range – IQR; 1.5-3.5). All patients were refractory to systemic oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Median time from diagnosis to PIPAC was 16 months (IQR; 5.6, 17.5) and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index was 29 (IQR; 20.5, 31.5). Five (62.5%) patients completed 3 PIPAC cycles while in 3 (37.5%) patients PIPAC was discontinued due to disease progression within the peritoneal cavity. No surgical complication or dose limiting toxicity was observed. Only one patient developed grade 3 treatment-related toxicity after first PIPAC (anemia), and another patient after second PIPAC (abdominal pain and anemia). At the completion of PIPAC treatment 5 patients had stable disease and 3 had disease progression. Pharmacokinetic, histologic response and preliminary survival data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: PIPAC with oxaliplatin is safe and feasible in a highly chemotherapy refractory cohort of appendiceal and colorectal carcinomatosis patients with or without sensitizing 5-FU/ LV. Clinical trial information: NCT04329494.