Back to Authors

Wick, Cameron C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1779-2385

Mayo Clinic

Washington University in St. Louis

Citations 1

Catchment Profile of Large Cochlear Implant Centers in the United States
Nassiri, Ashley M. , Holcomb, Meredith A. , Perkins, Elizabeth L. , Bucker, Andrea L., Prentiss, Sandra , Welch, Christopher M. , Andresen, Nick S., Valenzuela, Carla V. , Wick, Cameron C. , Angeli, Simón I., Sun, Daniel Q. , Bowditch, Stephen P., Brown, Kevin D. , Zwolan, Teresa A. , Haynes, David S. , Saoji, Aniket A. , Carlson, Matthew L. , Perkins, Elizabeth L

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | January 18, 2022 | Volume: 167 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 545-551

10.1177/01945998211070993 Get It

ObjectiveTo characterize the catchment area and patient profile of large cochlear implant (CI) centers in the United States.Study DesignMulti‐institutional retrospective case series.SettingTertiary referral CI centers.MethodsPatients who underwent CI surgery at 7 participating CI centers between 2015 and 2020 were identified. Patients’ residential zip codes were used to approximate travel distances and urban vs rural residential areas.ResultsOver the 6‐year study period (2015‐2020), 6313 unique CI surgical procedures occurred (4529 adult, 1784 pediatric). Between 2015 and 2019, CI procedures increased by 43%. Patients traveled a median 52 miles (interquartile range, 21‐110) each way; patients treated at rural CI centers traveled greater distances vs those treated at urban centers (72 vs 46 miles, P <. 001). Rural residents represented 61% of the patient population and traveled farther than urban residents (73 vs 24 miles, P <. 001). Overall, 91% of patients lived within a 200‐mile radius of the institution, while 71% lived within a 100‐mile radius. In adults, multiple regression analysis redemonstrated an association between greater travel distances and (1) older age at the time of CI and (2) residential rural setting (both P <. 001, r2 = 0.2).ConclusionsWhile large CI centers serve geographically dispersed populations, most patients reside within a 200‐mile radius. Strategies to expand CI utilization may leverage remote programming, telemedicine, and strategic placement of new centers and satellite clinics to ameliorate travel burden.