Odedina, Folakemi T.

Abstract Introduction: Pain is one of the complications of cancer or cancer treatment and affects the quality of life of cancer patients. Unfortunately, factors that alleviate cancer pain have been understudied despite pain being one of the most common symptoms of cancer. The purpose of this secondary comparative analysis study was to identify factors that alleviate cancer pain and their relationship to specific cancer types. Methods: The study comprised 579 participants from inpatient and outpatient cancer care centers in Seattle, WA. The participants used paper or a tablet computer to complete the McGill Pain Questionnaire, which included an open-ended question: “What kinds of things relieve your pain?” Text responses were coded into six outcome categories: 1) Activity level, 2) Cognitive, 3) Environmental, 4) Medical, 5) Physical, and 6) Sedentary behavior. Race and ethnicity categories were collapsed into Black/Other and White based on frequency distribution. We conducted a multivariable regression analysis adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics using the number of activities/factors in each of the six outcome categories. Results: Patients were mostly White (86%), female (27%) and aged 58.7± 12.3 years on average. Nearly 13% of the sample were Black/Other patients. The current pain intensity was more intense for Black/Other patients than White patients (p <0.001). Activity (ρ=0.02), cognition (ρ<0.001), and medication (ρ<0.001) were more frequently used as pain-alleviating factors among lung cancer patients compared to head and neck cancer patients. Males (ρ=0.02) and lung cancer patients (ρ=0.02) engaged in significantly less physical activity alleviating factors than females and head and neck cancer patients. Differences between the race groups were not statistically significant for mean alleviating factors. Conclusion: Although pain intensity is more intense for minority patients than their White counterparts, their behaviors to alleviate their pain do not differ in this sample. Differences in pain alleviating factors by gender and type of cancer warrant additional research to understand the complexity of patients’ self-care behaviors with consideration of demographic and cancer variables as well as analgesics. Citation Format: Dottington Fullwood, Sydney Means, Diana J. Wilkie, Folakemi T. Odedina. Pain alleviating factors reported by cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B009.

Abstract Background: Access to health care is important for prostate cancer (CaP) screening and control. There is evidence of the racial disparities in health access of black men and Hispanics; however, the comparison between black men's access to health in the United States and those in Africa has not been fully elucidated. Aim: This study aims to evaluate health access and willingness to screen for CaP among black men in Nigeria, Cameroon, and United States. Methods: The Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium (CaPTC) family cohort study phase 1 data of 500 community-dwelling black men in Nigeria, Cameroon, and the United States between 35 and 70 years were used in this study. The association between healthcare access and the willingness to screen for CaP was assessed. The data were described using numbers and percentages; Chi-square was used to test for the association between healthcare access and willingness to screen for CaP. P-values < 0.05 was set as significant. Results: The study showed that 86.1% were from Nigeria, 6.1% from Cameroon, and 7.8% from the United States. Most (75.6%) had never had prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening, and 87.8% had never had digital rectal examination (DRE). Willingness to screen was found in 36.8%, while 11.6% could not decide to screen; 27.4% and 33% were willing to screen for DRE and PSA, respectively. Majority (83.8%) had no access to medical doctors in the last 12 months, and the country of residence was not found to improve access to health (p= 0.378). Healthcare insurance coverage was more available to the US participants with 68.4%, 42.9% in Nigeria, and 16.7% in Cameroon. Overall willingness to screen, willingness for DRE and PSA screening were significantly associated with the country of residence with p-values of 0.02, <0.01, and <0.01, respectively. Having healthcare coverage was also associated with overall willingness to screen (p=0.033). Conclusions: The study showed that country of residence was not associated with health access; however, willingness for CaP screening was significantly associated with the country of residence and healthcare insurance coverage. Citation Format: Opeyemi O. Bolajoko, Catherine A. Oladoyinbo, Folakemi T. Odedina. Health access and willingness to screen for prostate cancer among black men in Nigeria, Cameroon, and United States [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A098.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Despite decades of effort and proposed solutions to increase diversity in clinical trial participation, African Americans remain underrepresented. Race-specific review of clinical trial participation challenges suggests that engagement with African American physicians influence successful recruitment and appropriate enrollment of underrepresented groups in clinical research. Tailoring best-practices for minoritized populations cannot be sustainably facilitated without trusted community-academic partnerships. Engagement with African American community physicians creates capacity for leveraging resources critical to participation of African Americans in decentralized clinical trials (DCT). The Northeast Florida Clinical Trials and Translational Science (NEF-CTaTS) Consortium was formed in 2022 to address cancer health disparities experienced by minoritized, marginalized and underserved communities in NE Florida. AIM:The NEF-CTaTS Consortium convened a Focus Group with 22 African American community physicians who care for minoritized patients to solicit their input in fostering active research, research training, community outreach and engagement, and to address advantages of and barriers to forming a research network of minority physicians to conduct decentralized clinical trials and translational research. METHODS: Practicing community primary care physician members of the Northeast Florida Medical Society, a chapter of the National Medical Association where invited to participate. Physician demographic and practice information was collected from physicians who consented to participate prior to the Focus Group discussion. A Clinical Trial Needs Assessment was completed by each participating physician. The Physician Focus Group discussion was moderated by a skilled African American community physician member of the NEF-CTaTS consortium with extensive experience in conducting clinical trials. The discussion was recorded and transcribed for data analysis. IRB approval was obtained prior to informed consent, data collection and Focus Group Discussion. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis of the raw data is currently ongoing at the time of this submission. Transcribed discussion details and the observational notes identified thematic framework for descriptive statements, indexing, and sifting data. Mapping and interpretation of data is being analyzed for relationships, internal consistency, intensity of comments and specificity of responses. Analysis is scheduled to be complete within 4 weeks of abstract submission. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to appropriately address disparities in clinical trial participation and DCT participation of African Americans require distinct and deliberate efforts to engage African American physician stakeholders. Addressing issues of trust and the impact of social-determinants of health on minoritized populations can be culturally and appropriately addressed by community-academic partnerships. Citation Format: Floyd Willis, Folakemi Odedina, Kim Barbel Johnson, Rogers Cain, Jennifer Crook. Addressing African American physician engagement in decentralized clinical trial by clinical trials and translation science consortium focus group participation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B035.

Abstract Background: To date, the disparate burden of prostate cancer (CaP) in Black men (BM) is still poorly understood. More disconcerting is the limited access to effective, culturally tailored behavioral interventions to support BM diagnosed with CaP, especially at the point of prostate cancer diagnosis (PPCD). From the PPCD, the transition to CaP survivorship can be mentally and physically trying, especially for those lacking emotional and financial support. It is important to provide psycho-oncology support, address social determinants of health (SDOH) and make emotional support available to ethnically diverse BM at the PPCD. We are addressing the CaP disparities experienced by BM at the PPCD through the Inclusive Cancer Care Research Equity (iCCaRE) for Black Men Consortium. Aim: As part of the iCCaRE for Black men Consortium, the specific aim of our project is to develop a PPCD-based Augmented Reality (AR) intervention program, the iCCaRE PPCD Virtual Robot Assistant (ViRA). The ViRA is based on the established efficacy of six CaP care and survivorship (CaPCaS) video interventions, and will support BM at the PPCD. Methodology: The efficacy of six CaPCaS videos were established through formative research that included 17 BM in Florida. Based on pre- and post-test design, data were collected from participants using a structured survey tailored to each CaPCaS intervention: Prevention, Detection, Diagnosis, Treatment, Survivorship and Advocacy form. Following the efficacy study, the iCCaRE PPCD ViRA was proposed as one of five iCCaRE Science of Survivorship (S.O.S) projects to improve the quality of life of BM. Results: Most of the participants for the efficacy study reported that they were: US-born BM; married; college educated; earn less than $60,000; retired; have health insurance; have annual health examination; have a regular doctor; and were screened within the last year. The CaPCaS videos were found to be efficacious in improving attitude towards CaP screening, beliefs about CaP screening, perceived behavioral control and CaP knowledge. Participants also rated the quality of the videos high and expressed high satisfaction with the videos. We are currently in the development phase of the PPCD iCCaRE ViRA, which is based on behavioral science and health communications model. The ViRA will provide SDOH navigation services, psycho-oncology support and emotional support. The acceptance and usability of the iCCaRE ViRA will be established at urology clinics in Florida as part of the iCCaRE Consortium HEROICA Phase I study. We will test the central hypothesis that improving SDOH factors and CaPCaS-related factors will lead to an improvement in patient reported outcomes. Conclusion: We established the efficacy of the CaPCaS interventions in supporting BM across the CaP care continuum. The iCCaRE ViRA under development will target intervention at the PPCD and deliver a smart and connected personalized AR-enabled intervention system that will positively impact CaP diagnosis experience of BM. Citation Format: Folakemi Odedina, Che Ngufor, Arnold Merriweather, Deidre Pereira, Jennifer Crook, Fathi Parisa, Roxana Dronca, Ernest Kaninjing, Solomon Rotimi, Kimlin Ashing, Manisha Salinas, Sha’Reff Rashad, John McCall, Ebenezer Erefah, Ayinde Yahaya, Wes Sholes. A point of prostate cancer diagnosis (PPCD) Virtual Robot Assistant (ViRA) intervention for newly diagnosed Black men: An iCCaRE consortium for prostate cancer in Black men project [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B028.

Abstract Background: A recent report from the AACR has found that black men (BM) men have prostate cancer (CaP) death rates that are more than 2 times those for men of any other race or ethnicity. Yet, BM are less likely to receive cutting-edge, or even standard of care treatment compared to their white counterparts. Limited access to care, transportation, patient perception and medical mistrust, as well as cost of care are major contributing factors. Meeting patients where they are and offering treatment in or closer to their homes should help reduce psychological distress and increase access to care and treatment compliance. As part of the iCCaRE for Black men Consortium, we propose a PCHC model which leverages Mayo Clinic Advanced Care at Home (ACH) program and provides a package of care to support the administration of cancer therapy and/or supportive care/symptom management to CaP patients in their homes by specialist healthcare professionals. The objectives of our pilot study are to understand patients’ choice of therapy in choosing the place of treatment and to evaluate the feasibility and impact of PCHC on clinical outcomes, as well as patient reported-outcomes (PRO) and health related quality of life (HQOL). Methodology: For Aim 1, structured questionnaires are used to assess patient preference for location of therapy, at the infusion center or in the home, as well as perceived difficulties and advantages; follow up qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interviews to capture patients’ thoughts, feelings, attitudes, and questions towards cancer treatments being administered at home versus in a hospital setting. Aim 2 is an observational study of BM with advanced CaP who are participating in a pragmatic, practice-based randomized clinical trial to track acceptability by and impact of home administration of cancer directed or supportive therapy. Results: For Aim 1, data is used to identify themes regarding perceived advantages and concerns of PCHC and inform our understanding of the proportion of patients who are willing to receive and would benefit from this level of care at home. For Aim 2, the following outcomes are evaluated: (a) time to first ER visit and to first hospitalization; (b) HRQoL and quality-adjusted survival; (c) patient satisfaction and compliance, including home time, adherence with symptom self-reporting and compliance with treatment, level of comfort interacting with the care team by phone or tablet, ability to reach a team member for questions or concerns; (d) cost, including out of pocket cost for patients. Conclusion: Our project will provide data on patient understanding and acceptability of cancer care at home and strategies for overcoming cancer care delivery disparities and barriers of access to care for underserved communities. The expected outcome of our project is that PCHC intervention will positively impact CaP treatment, patients’ access and experience with healthcare by developing a new concept of closer-to home cancer care delivery that will reach more patients in underserved communities. Citation Format: Roxana Dronca, Rohit Rao, Michael Maniaci, Folakemi Odedina, Ernest Kaninjing, Kimlin Ashing, Solomon Rotimi, Manisha Salinas, Sha’Reff Rashad, Arnold Merriweather, John McCall, Ebenezer Erefah, Ayinde Yahaya. Feasibility of patient-centered home care (PCHC) to reduce disparities in Black men (BM) with advanced prostate cancer (CaP): An iCCaRE Consortium for prostate cancer in Black men project [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B046.

Abstract Background: Sub-Saharan African immigrants (SSAI) in the United States (US) constitute one of the fastest-growing segments of the immigrant population. Between 2010 and 2018, the SSAI population in the US increased by 53%, significantly outpacing the 12% growth rate for the overall foreign-born population in the US during that time frame. For the purposes of this study, we define SSAI as the 2 million individuals living in the US originally from the region of the African continent located south of the Saharan desert. Despite their growing numbers, little is published about the extent to which SSAI adapt to health behaviors more common in the US or remain immersed in the values, beliefs and practices reflective of their country of origin. Importantly, no study has comprehensively examined the social determinants of health factors among this population and its influence on health-seeking behaviors and decision-making regarding prostate cancer care and treatment options. This study employs the social determinant of migrant health framework to examine the impact of immigration on the health-seeking behaviors of SSAI including informed-decision making, psychosocial effects and coping mechanisms. This study will fill the void of research studies that link social determinant of health and immigration among SSAI. Methods: Grounded theory will guide the study design that include in-depth interviews to document the experiences of SSAI relative to health seeking behaviors, care, and treatment. We explore differences and similarities among participants based on country or region of origin in Africa. We employ the social determinants of migrant health framework to better understand the needs of SSAI prostate cancer survivors in the United States and how to effectively support these survivors. Results: We will present findings based on preliminary interviews conducted with SSAI prostate cancer survivors recruited from Florida or Minnesota. Additionally, we will report on the development of a SSAI social determinant of migration model that explains individual and structural factors that impact the health-seeking behaviors and coping mechanisms among this population. We will provide new understanding about specific social determinant of health factors that can be addressed in intervention studies among SSAI in the United States. Conclusion: This study examines the full range of racial, social, environmental, behavioral and structural factors that SSAI prostate cancer survivors experience. It will illuminate the decision-making process and overall quality of care among this understudied population. Citation Format: Ernie Kaninjing, Gladys Asiedu, Mary Ellen Young, Ebenezer Erefah, Folakemi Odedina, Roxana Dronca, Kimlin Ashing, Solomon Rotimi, Che Ngufor, Arnold Merriweather, Jennifer Crook, Manisha Salinas, Parisa Fathi, Sha’Reff Rashad, John McCall, Ayinde Yahaya. The iCCARE consortium for prostate cancer in Black men: Grounded theory study of the social determinant of health factors among African immigrant men diagnosed with prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B050.

Abstract Background: Inclusion of historically underrepresented populations in research has been a problem existing for many years. The recent Covid pandemic has exposed the significant cost of gaps in access to care. There remains a need to reevaluate current research paradigm frameworks to consider tailored approaches that accommodate any location that would ease participant burden and maintain retention. Current decentralized research models include home and mobile options. However, barriers exist, and certain demographics remain elusive to recruitment into research studies. Aim: In this paper, we aim to identify a theoretical framework that will allow for more inclusivity in research. Methodology: Current utilized community-based decentralized research models are compared, barriers in recruitment and retention of interested participants are examined, and a framework individualized to study participants is offered. Results: The proposed framework expands upon the complex adaptive systems theory to incorporate community-based research which considers dividing studies into individual study visit components that may differ in location. It allows for ease of research participant access to care and mutual collaboration among providers and institutions. This new theoretical model expansion outlines a novel approach to community-based participatory research for increased representation and inclusion. Conclusion: Investigators should carefully consider creative and effective solutions to overcome barriers to research participation access, increase diversity and representation, and provide tailored public health interventions. Minimally risk study intervention visits may occur in multiple community-driven locations such as: community resource centers, local physician offices, mobile research units, remote electronic visits, home settings, and a combination of the above (hybrid model). Breaking studies into individual study visit components expands the reach of science into the communities that have long been difficult to reach. Citation Format: Jennifer M. Crook, Manisha Salinas, Parisa Fathi, Jessica Otero Machuca, Emelina Asto Flores, Monica Albertie, Noreen Stephenson, Chelsea Reeves, Folakemi Odedina. Expanding current decentralized research model concepts for targeted community health interventions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A060.

Abstract Background: Black men across the world continue to bear the burden of prostate cancer (PCa). Although several factors account for this, studies have demonstrated that the adaptive constitutive biological factors associated with African ancestry contribute to the risk of disease development, disease aggression, and poor disease outcomes in Black men. However, the limited inclusion of Blacks in cancer biology studies limits the understanding of the extent to which biology influence outcomes among Blacks. Furthermore, beyond White-Black dichotomous disparity, there exists an under-exploited within-group geographical and ancestral disparities in the burden, clinical presentation, and outcomes of PCa among Black men globally. Aside from urological and sexual problems, Black PCa survivors experience poor mental health, with a concomitant reduction in the quality of life and overall survival. Hence, improving the overall well-being of PCa survivors requires an understanding of the biological determinants of mental health among diverse groups of Black PCa survivors. Methods: Structured questionnaires are being used to access fatigue, pain, depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, and PCa-specific symptoms burden among within a cohort of ethnically diverse Black PCa survivors in Africa. This is linked with the salivary biomarkers of inflammation, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, and tryptophan-kynurenine pathway in our studies population. Results: Data from fifty PCa survivors across different African ethnic groups (including, Yoruba, Igbo, Hausa) will be presented. This study will measure biological variables (e.g, inflammatory markers, cortisol, tryptophan, kynurenine, and serotonin) and survivors self-reported (e.g. health-related quality of life and psychoneurological symptoms) measures to better examine the interconnectedness between cancer-associated biomarkers and poor mental health. Conclusion: This study will lay an essential foundation for understanding the extent to which cancer associated-biological determinants contribute to the poor mental health of PCa survivors, unravels the within-group disparities in the mental health of Black PCa survivors, establish the contribution of genetics to poor mental health in Black PCa survivors and provide the opportunity for pharmacogenomic intervention that will improve the quality of life. Citation Format: Solomon O. Rotimi, Folakemi Odedina, Roxana Dronca, Kimlin Ashing, Ernest Kaninjing, Che Ngufor, Arnold Merriweather, Jennifer Crook, Manisha Salinas, Fathi Parisa, Sha’Reff Rashad, John McCall, Ebenezer Erefah, Ayinde Yahaya. Investigating the biological determinants of poor mental health among ethnically diverse Black prostate cancer survivors: An iCCaRE consortium for prostate cancer in Black men project [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A045.

Abstract Background: The prostate cancer (CaP) disparities experienced by Black men (BM) in the US is a microcosm of the burden of CaP seen in BM globally. The complexity of CaP disparities and the need for a unique approach to better understand and address a complex chronic disease, such as CaP, underscores the need for consortium research that is multilevel, collaborative, translational, and global. In response to this need, we brought together CaP survivors, advocates, scientists and clinicians to form the inclusive Cancer Care Research Equity (iCCaRE) for Black Men Consortium. Aim: Our overall goal is to optimize CaP diagnosis experiences, treatment and survivorship based on the Science of Survivorship (S.O.S). Our primary aim was to develop a consortium co-led by CaP scientists and survivors with multiple S.O.S research projects supported by research cores/services across multiple institutions. Methodology: The consortium was developed to comprise multiple individuals with complementary expertise and resources working collaboratively to achieve the common purpose of eliminating CaP disparities globally. Building on the expertise, resources, and relationships of collaborating CaP investigators, survivors and advocates, the iCCaRE Consortium was proposed to “advance health equity and reduce disparities in CaP” by studying the within-group differences among ethnically diverse BM and comparing US-born BM to their ancestral populations, including West African immigrant men in the US and indigenous West African men. Results: Through the Department of Defense Health Equity Research and Outcomes Improvement Consortium (HEROIC) Award, the iCCaRE Consortium was launched in 2022. There are five pilot projects (PPs), each co-led by a scientist PI and community PI: PP1 will plan and develop a Virtual Robot Assistant (ViRA) that will provide SDOH navigation services, psycho-oncology support and emotional support for BM newly diagnosed with CaP. PP2 will develop and analyze the impact of a patient-centered home cancer care system on health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL), access to healthcare, and PROs. PP3 will plan and develop a ViRA to improve HRQOL in Black CaP survivors. PP4 will employ the social determinants of migrant health framework to understand and address the needs of sub-Saharan African immigrant CaP survivors. PP5 will explore how biological factors induced by cancer cells contribute to poor mental health of CaP survivors. The PPs are supported by an Administrative Core, Translational Research & Clinical Intervention Service, Data Management and Analytics Services, Partnership Engagement Services, Pathology Resource & Biospecimen Core, Methodology and Measures Services and Digital Health & Human Services. Conclusion: The iCCaRE Consortium will “improve HRQOL to enhance outcomes and overall health and wellness for those impacted by CaP” by developing and implementing Artificial Intelligence interventions that address social determinants of health, psycho-oncology support and emotional support for newly diagnosed CaP patients. Citation Format: Folakemi Odedina, Roxana Dronca, Kimlin Ashing, Ernest Kaninjing, Solomon Rotimi, Che Ngufor, Arnold Merriweather, Jennifer Crook, Manisha Salinas, Fathi Parisa, Sha’Reff Rashad, John McCall, Ebenezer Erefah, Ayinde Yahaya. Addressing prostate cancer disparities through the Inclusive Cancer Care Research Equity (iCCaRE) for Black men consortium [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A042.

Abstract Introduction: Although prostate cancer (CaP) mortality rates are low, higher morbidity rates have been reported in Black men. In addition, the transition from treatment to survivorship can be burdensome and negatively impact quality of life (QoL). However, informal and formal support networks and resources, particularly spousal support, help enhance the sense of self and patient’s activities of daily living. Community, family involvement, and interaction with other survivors have also been found to be beneficial to survivors during diagnosis and treatment. Thus, we convened a town hall event for CaP survivors and those who care for and love them to explore the multidimensional impact of CaP and better understand the clinical and psychosocial needs of ethnically diverse Black CaP survivors. Methods: The virtual inaugural town hall meeting, organized by the University of Oklahoma (OU) Health and Stephenson Cancer Center, was held on April 28, 2022. The panelists included ethnically diverse CaP survivors, a radiation oncologist and urologist, and the spouse of a survivor. The town hall also served as a means to provide informational resources to attendees. A post-town hall survey was made available to all attendees to evaluate the town hall session and collect clinical and sociodemographic variables. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS v27. The event was audio recorded, and the transcript was content-analyzed to identify emergent themes. Results: Twenty-one out of the 43 attendees completed the survey (response rate of 49%). The respondents were aged 31-74 years old (mean±SD, 58±13), mostly males (67%), married (68%), CaP survivors (52%), and college graduates (43%). More than 80% rated the town hall to be very good/excellent and educational in light of varied approaches, perspectives, stories, and experiences shared by all the panelists. Participants appreciated updated information conveyed on anatomy, screening, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, stages of CaP, treatment, and short-term and long-term side effects shared by the oncologist. Results highlighted the physical and psychosocial impacts and stresses of CaP diagnosis on a family as a unit, especially intergenerational communication of perceived susceptibility and risk. Panelists also highlighted the burden of CaP survivorship on relationships, especially with their partners/spouses with impending functional distress. Results also underscored the positive influence CaP survivors can have on other survivors via peer advocacy and support. Finally, giving more time to panelists, extending the Q&A session, including other caregivers as panelists, and having more town hall events were top recommendations offered by participants. Conclusion: The town hall format allowed panelists, especially CaP survivors, to freely express their experiences with CaP. Overall, more awareness was raised about the importance of CaP prevention, treatment decision-making, survivorship, and advocacy: invaluable discussions needed to engage this hard-to-reach population regarding CaP prevention and care. Citation Format: Motolani E. Ogunsanya, Ernie Kaninjing, Maleeha Shahid, Darla Kendzor, Kathleen Dwyer, Mary Ellen Young, Folakemi T. Odedina. Prostate cancer survivorship and advocacy in ethnically diverse Black men: Findings from a town hall event [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A041.