Back to Authors

Kasozi, Ramla N.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9621-1619

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 4

Disparities in Offering Enrollment in Remote Patient Monitoring for COVID-19
Thompson, Joshua A. , Hersch, Derek , Kasozi, Ramla N. , Miner, Michael H. , Adam, Patricia

Telemedicine and e-Health | September 14, 2023 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 715-721

10.1089/tmj.2023.0150 Get It

Estimating glomerular filtration rate with new equations: can one size ever fit all?
Kasozi, Ramla N. , Meeusen, Jeffrey W. , Lieske, John C. , Lieske, John C

Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences | June 1, 2023 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 549-559

10.1080/10408363.2023.2214812 Get It

A Case of Confounding Back Pain
Green, C, Mbatidde, Lydia, Shah, Jehan R., Punj, Mantavya , Kasozi, Ramla N. , Maynard, Jennifer R. , Green, Cedric A

American Journal of Case Reports | May 11, 2023 | Volume: 24 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.12659/ajcr.939784 Get It

Clinical Impact of the Refit CKD-EPI 2021 Creatinine-Based eGFR Equation
Meeusen, Jeffrey W. , Kasozi, Ramla N. , Larson, Timothy S., Lieske, John C. , Lieske, John C

Clinical Chemistry | January 6, 2022 | Volume: 68 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 534-539

10.1093/clinchem/hvab282 Get It

Abstract Background The National Kidney Foundation recently endorsed the refit Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using creatinine, age and sex [2021 eGFRCr(AS)] without a coefficient for race. We evaluated the impact of adopting the 2021 eGFRCr(AS) equation or a variation of the 2009 CKD-EPI eGFR equation without race [2009 CKD-EPI eGFRCr(ASR-NB)] compared to the original CKD-EPI eGFR [2009 eGFRCr(ASR)]. Methods The studied population included patients with a clinically ordered iothalamate clearance (n = 33 889). Bias was assessed as the difference between measured and estimated GFR, P30 was defined as the percentage of estimates within 30% of measured GFR, and concordance was determined according to relevant clinical thresholds. Results Among Black patients, the median bias for 2009 eGFRCr(ASR), 2009 eGFRCr(ASR-NB), and 2021 eGFRCr(AS) was −1.32 mL min−1 (1.73 m2)−1 (95CI −2.46 to −0.26), −8.81 mL min−1 (1.73 m2)−1 (95CI −9.93 to −7.58), and −6.08 mL min−1 (1.73 m2)−1 (95CI −7.18 to −4.92), respectively. The median bias among non-Black patients was −0.15 m min−1 (1.73 m2)−1 (95CI −0.84 to −0.08) for 2021 eGFRcr(AS) compared to −3.09 mL min−1 (1.73 m2)−1 (95CI −3.17 to −3.03) for the 2009 eGFRCr(ASR). P30 and concordance were not significantly different in either racial group. The net reclassification improvement at a measured GFR <20 mL min−1 (1.73 m2)−1 was 6.4% (95CI 0.36 to 12.4) for Black patients and −5.1% (95CI −6.0 to −4.1) for non-Black patients using the 2021 eGFRCr(AS) equation. Conclusions Overall, the change in reported eGFR was minimal. However, these changes led to significant reclassification improvements at lower eGFR, which will indirectly improve equitable access to CKD resources.