e18584 Background: Cancer progression rates following diagnosis are readily measured. However, the progression rate of cancer during the preclinical sojourn time is generally unobserved. Understanding the duration of preclinical stages (“dwell time”) would allow clinicians to better identify appropriate screening intervals for cancer. We therefore elicited estimates of progression rate during the preclinical sojourn time for a wide variety of malignancies from a panel of clinical experts. Methods: We used a validated consensus methodology (RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel method) to elicit per-stage dwell time estimates for 20 solid cancers and lymphoma from experts. Eleven experienced oncologists (general and subspecialists) from community and academic centers reviewed literature on the natural history of disease and estimated in number of years (<1 to 9+ years) how long it would take each cancer to progress from the beginning of clinically detectable Stage I/II/III to the beginning of the next stage in untreated adults. Cancer histological subtypes were grouped and experts were asked to provide an overall rating. Ratings were completed before and after a discussion of areas of disagreement. Results: Expert estimates and range of dwell time for 21 cancer types are provided in Table. Prostate and thyroid cancer were estimated to be the slowest growing, taking approximately 7 and 5 years respectively to progress through Stage I (range 4-8), 5 years to progress through Stage II (range 3-7), and 3 and 4 (range 2-5) years respectively to progress through Stage III. Esophageal, lung, liver/intrahepatic bile-duct, gallbladder, and pancreatic cancers were estimated to progress quickly through all three stages (1-2 years per stage). Conclusions: These findings summarize practicing oncologists’ estimates of dwell time in preclinical disease. Experts agreed on dwell times although ranges were large and differences in cancer subtypes were not captured. Generally, estimates trend with published data on survival with treatment: cancers with higher survival (e.g., prostate, thyroid) were estimated to grow slower, while cancers with lower survival (e.g., pancreatic, liver/intrahepatic bile-duct, gallbladder) were estimated to grow faster. These estimates could be useful when determining screening intervals for these or any subset of these cancers. [Table: see text]
Continued high activity of figitumumab (CP-751,871) combination therapy in squamous lung cancer
8072 Background: Figitumumab (CP-751,871) is a fully human, IgG2monoclonal antibody against the insulin-like growth factor type I receptor (IGF-IR). We reported in a randomized phase II study (ASCO 2008), preliminary evidence of high activity of the combination of paclitaxel (T), carboplatin (C) and figitumumab (F) in advanced treatment-naïve NSCLC of squamous cell histology (n=11 pts). A single arm trial extension cohort was conducted to confirm those findings. Methods: Fifty-six pts with non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC were enrolled. Pts received T (200 mg/m2), C (AUC of 6) and F (20 mg/kg) q3weeks for up to 6 cycles; pts with response (PR) or stable disease were eligible to continue F as single agent until disease progression. Statistical hypotheses were 30% (null) versus 50% (response of interest). Protein expression of the IGF-IR in core tumor biopsies was quantified using automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) technology. Results: Pts were 72% male, 28% >70 years old and 91% stage IV. Median number of treatment cycles was 4, with 46% of pts receiving single agent F beyond cycle 4. TCF was well tolerated. The most common all-causality grade 3, 4 CTCAE adverse events were neutropenia (21%), hyperglycemia (14%) and fatigue (14%). Hyperglycemia adverse events almost always occurred within the first treatment cycle and were manageable with standard measures. Responses in squamous pts are currently 25 out of 40 pts according to RECIST, with final response assessment still pending for 7 additional pts (≥53%, p<0.001). One complete response and 7 striking PRs (50–80% tumor size reduction at cycle 2) were observed. Tumor size reductions with F maintenance treatment were also seen in 2 pts. Median progression free survival has not been yet reached at 4 months follow up. A trend (p=0.1) for higher IGF-IR expression in patients responding to TCF was observed in a small data set (n=12). Median tumor IGF-IR expression in pts responding to TCF therapy and non-responders were respectively 6287 and 4131 AQUA scores. Analysis of IGF-IR and other members of the IGF-IR pathway continues. Conclusions: These data further support the activity of figitumumab combination therapy in pts with squamous NSCLC. [Table: see text]
Phase II Study of the Anti–Insulin-Like Growth Factor Type 1 Receptor Antibody CP-751,871 in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Previously Untreated, Locally Advanced, or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Purpose We conducted a phase II study of combination of the anti–insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor antibody CP-751,871 with paclitaxel and carboplatin (PCI) in advanced treatment-naïve non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to paclitaxel 200 mg/m2, carboplatin (area under the plasma concentration-time curve of 6), and CP-751,871 10 to 20 mg/kg (PCI10, PCI20) or paclitaxel and carboplatin alone (PC) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. PCI10-20 patients could continue CP-751,871 (figitumumab) treatment after chemotherapy discontinuation. Patients treated with PC experiencing disease progression were eligible to receive CP-751,871 at investigator's discretion. An additional nonrandomized single-arm cohort of 30 patients with nonadenocarcinoma tumor histology receiving PCI20 was enrolled on completion of the randomized study. Results A total of 156 patients were enrolled onto the randomized portion of the study. Safety and efficacy information are available for 151 patients (98 patients treated with PCI and 53 patients treated with PC). Forty-eight patients treated with PCI received PCI10 and 50 patients received PCI20 in two sequential stages. Twenty of 53 patients treated with PC received CP-751,871 after disease progression. PCI was well tolerated. Fifty-four percent of patients treated with PCI and 42% of patients treated with PC had objective responses. Sixteen of 23 patients assessable for efficacy in the nonrandomized single-arm extension cohort also responded to treatment. Of note, 14 of 18 randomly assigned and 11 of 14 nonrandomly assigned patients treated with PCI with squamous cell carcinoma histology had response to treatment, including nine objective responses in bulky disease. Responses were also observed in two patients with squamous histology receiving CP-751,871 on PC discontinuation. PCI20/PC hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0.8 to 0.56, according to censorship. Conclusion These data suggest that PCI20 is safe and effective in patients with NSCLC.