Back to Authors

Syal, Arjun

0009-0000-0793-5560

Mayo Clinic

New York Medical College

Citations 2

A comparison of treating physician versus independent core lab assessments of post–aneurysm treatment imaging outcomes: an analysis of prospectively collected data from a randomized trial
Patra, Devi Prasad, Syal, Arjun , Rahme, Rudy J. , Abi-Aad, Karl R., Turcotte, Evelyn L. , Jones, Breck A., Meyer, Jenna , Hudson, Miles , Chong, Brian W. , Dabus, Guilherme , James, Robert F. , Krishna, Chandan , Patra, Devi P. , Singh, Rohin , Dabus, Guilherme C. , Bendok, Bernard R.

Journal of Neurosurgery | December 23, 2022 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 85-93

10.3171/2022.10.jns22841 Get It

OBJECTIVE Aneurysm occlusion has been used as surrogate marker of aneurysm treatment efficacy. Aneurysm occlusion scales are used to evaluate the outcome of endovascular aneurysm treatment and to monitor recurrence. These scales, however, require subjective interpretation of imaging data, which can reduce the utility and reliability of these scales and the validity of clinical studies regarding aneurysm occlusion rates. Use of a core lab with independent blinded reviewers has been implemented to enhance the validity of occlusion rate assessments in clinical trials. The degree of agreement between core labs and treating physicians has not been well studied with prospectively collected data. METHODS In this study, the authors analyzed data from the Hydrogel Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment (HEAT) trial to assess the interrater agreement between the treating physician and the blinded core lab. The HEAT trial included 600 patients across 46 sites with intracranial aneurysms treated with coiling. The treating site and the core lab independently reviewed immediate postoperative and follow-up imaging (3–12 and 18–24 months, respectively) using the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC) scale, Meyer scale, and recanalization survey. A post hoc analysis was performed to calculate interrater reliability using Cohen’s kappa. Further analysis was performed to assess whether degree of agreement varied on the basis of various factors, including scale used, timing of imaging, size of the aneurysm, imaging modality, location of the aneurysm, dome-to-neck ratio, and rupture status. RESULTS Minimal interrater agreement was noted between the core lab reviewers and the treating physicians for assessing aneurysm occlusion using the RROC grading scale (k = 0.39, 95% CI 0.38–0.40) and Meyer scale (k = 0.23, 95% CI 0.14–0.38). The degree of agreement between groups was slightly better but still weak for assessing recanalization (k = 0.45, 95% CI 0.38–0.52). Factors that significantly improved degree of agreement were scales with fewer variables, greater time to follow-up, imaging modality (digital subtraction angiography), and wide-neck aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS Assessment of aneurysm treatment outcome with commonly used aneurysm occlusion scales suffers from risk of poor interrater agreement. This supports the use of independent core labs for validation of outcome data to minimize reporting bias. Use of outcome tools with fewer point categories is likely to provide better interrater reliability. Therefore, the outcome assessment tools are ideal for clinical outcome assessment provided that they are sensitive enough to detect a clinically significant change.
Real-Time MRI–Guided Stereotactic Aspiration of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hematoma: A Preclinical Feasibility Study
Patra, Devi Prasad, Welz, Matthew E., Turcotte, Evelyn L. , Pandey, Rajesh, Vij, Kamal, Daly, Max, Rabon, Matthew , Korszen, Stephanie, Halpin, Brooke S. , Marchese, Marco L., Syal, Arjun , Krishna, Chandan , Patra, Devi P. , Bendok, Bernard R , Pandey, Rajesh, Zhou, Yuxiang , Bendok, Bernard R.

Operative Neurosurgery | December 22, 2021 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 80-86

10.1227/ons.0000000000000005 Get It

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgical techniques have reinvigorated the role of surgical options for spontaneous intracranial hematomas; however, they are limited by the lack of real-time feedback on the extent of hematoma evacuation. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of a MRI-guided catheter-based aspiration system, the ClearPoint Pursuit Neuroaspiration Device (ClearPoint Neuro) and validation in phantom models. METHODS: In this preclinical experimental trial, 8 phantom brains with skull models were created to simulate an intracranial hematoma with 2 clot sizes, 30 cc (small clot) and 60 cc (large clot). After registration, the aspiration catheter (Pursuit device) was aligned to the desired planned trajectory. The aspiration of the clot was performed under real-time MRI scan in 3 orthogonal views. The primary end point was reduction of the clot volume to less than 15 cc or 70% of the original clot volume. RESULTS: Successful completion of clot evacuation was achieved in all models. The average postaspiration clot volume was 9.5 cc (8.7 cc for small clots and 10.2 cc for large clots). The average percentage reduction of clot volume was 76.3% (range 58.7%-85.2%). The average total procedure time (from frame registration to final postaspiration clot assessment) was 50 min. The average aspiration time was 6.9 min. CONCLUSION: This preclinical trial confirms the feasibility and efficacy of MRI-guided aspiration under real-time image guidance in simulation models for intracranial hematoma. Clinical use of the system in patients would further validate its efficacy and safety.