AbstractLymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare disease with variable presentations. The neoplastic cells in LAM demonstrate a unique and diagnostically important “myomelanocytic” phenotype. Cytologic reports of LAM are infrequent and have not in the past emphasized the floating island pattern in which circumscribed aggregates of lesional cells are rimmed by appliques of flattened endothelium. This case illustrates the cytology of LAM and emphasizes that the floating island cytoarchitectural pattern more classically associated with entities such as hepatocellular carcinomas may be seen in cytological preparations of LAM at unanticipated body sites.
Lack of radiosensitivity predicts poor disease specific survival in myxoid liposarcoma
AbstractBackgroundCompared to other sarcomas, myxoid liposarcoma (ML) is known to be radiosensitive, with improved oncologic outcomes. Although these tumors “shrink” following radiotherapy, there is a paucity of data examining the degree of radiosensitivity and oncologic outcome. The purpose of the study was to evaluate pre‐ and postradiotherapy tumor volume to determine if size reduction impacts outcome.MethodsWe reviewed 62 patients with ML undergoing surgical resection combined with preoperative radiotherapy, with pre‐ and postradiotherapy MRI. This included 34 (55%) males, with a mean age of 47 ± 14 years. All tumors were deep to the fascia, and 12 (19%) patients had tumors with a >5% round‐cell component.ResultsThe mean volume reduction was 54% ± 29%. Compared to patients with >25% volume reduction, patients with reduction ≤25% had worse 10‐year disease specific survival (86% vs. 37%, p < 0.01), in addition to an increased risk of metastatic disease (HR 4.63, p < 0.01) and death due to disease (HR 4.52, p < 0.01).ConclusionLack of volume reduction is a risk factor for metastatic disease and subsequent death due to disease in patients with extremity ML treated with combined preoperative radiotherapy and surgery. This data could be used to stratify patients for adjuvant therapies and follow‐up intervals.
AbstractTumor‐to‐tumor metastases are an uncommon phenomenon and are very rare in the context of malignant melanoma. This case report describes a 73‐year‐old male who underwent an excision of a melanoma from his forehead. Six months later, he developed metastatic disease, including metastasis to a genetically confirmed angiofibroma of soft tissue of the abdominal wall. Angiofibroma of soft tissue is a relatively recently described benign fibrovascular soft tissue tumor, and there appear to be no previous reports of it being a recipient tumor for a metastasis. Awareness of the phenomenon of tumor‐to‐tumor metastasis and of the distinctive morphologic and molecular genetic features of angiofibroma are critical to avoid misdiagnosis of this very rare event as “dedifferentiated” melanoma.
Pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLPS) is a highly aggressive sarcoma comprising variable numbers of pleomorphic lipoblasts mixed with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS)-like areas. Morphologic variants, such as myxofibrosarcoma-like or epithelioid, may cause diagnostic confusion, especially on a core biopsy, but there are few data on the prognostic significance of these features. A total of 120 PLPS biopsies and resection specimens were reviewed and catalogued based on the presence of myxofibrosarcoma-like, UPS-like, and epithelioid foci, in 10% increments. The clinical parameters were collected. Cases occurred in 75 males and 45 females, ranging from 8 to 98 years (median, 62.5 y). Cases arose in the extremities (n=72), trunk (n=32), head/neck (n=10), bone (n=4), mediastinum (n=1), or viscera (colon polyp, n=1). Of those with known depth (n=81), 40 were intramuscular, 34 were subcutaneous, and 7 arose in the dermis. Their sizes ranged from 1 to 24.5 cm (median, 7 cm). Of the patients with ≥1 month of follow-up (n=70), 5 had recurrence and 15 had metastasis. The 5-year overall survival and event-free survival rates were 66.2% and 63.1%, respectively. Tumors ≥5 cm had inferior overall survival compared with tumors <5 cm. The presence of epithelioid areas was also statistically significant in terms of poorer overall survival and event-free survival, while tumors with ≥50% undifferentiated pleomorphic-like areas had better overall survival. There was a trend towards poorer outcomes in tumors with necrosis (≥1%). PLPS is an aggressive adipocytic malignancy that is most commonly present in the extremities of older adults. The morphologic features of these tumors are diverse, and they may be mistaken for UPS or myxofibrosarcoma, carcinoma, and melanomas, particularly on biopsies. Tumor size, necrosis, and epithelioid morphology are associated with adverse prognosis.
‘I Can’t Keep Up!’: an update on advances in soft tissue pathology occurring after the publication of the 2020 World Health Organization classification of soft tissue and bone tumours
Progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis and diagnosis of soft tissue neoplasia is exceptionally rapid. Although the most recent World Health Organization classification of soft tissue tumours contains many new entities and refinements of older ones, even this comprehensive document is by now incomplete or in need of modification. This review will attempt to summarise the developments in soft tissue pathology that have occurred since 2020, emphasising lesions for which morphology and genetics intersect in a complementary fashion. Novel entities discussed include KMT2A ‐rearranged sarcoma, PRRX :: NCOAx fibroblastic tumours, EWSR1 :: PATZ1 sarcomas, BRAF ‐altered infantile fibrosarcoma‐like lesions, NUTM1 ‐rearranged colorectal sarcomas, and a variety of interesting giant cell‐rich and matrix‐producing lesions. In addition, recently described mimics of atypical lipomatous tumour/well‐differentiated liposarcoma are covered, as is a wholly new, morphologically defined and genetically confirmed entity, pseudoendocrine sarcoma. Finally, exciting new developments in the use of immunohistochemistry as a surrogate for molecular genetic techniques are discussed.
PRRX1–NCOA1‐rearranged fibroblastic tumour: a clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic study of six cases of a potentially under‐recognised, distinctive mesenchymal tumour
AimsPRRX1–NCOA1‐rearranged fibroblastic tumour is a recently described, rare mesenchymal tumour. Only four cases have been previously reported. The aim of this article is to report six additional cases of this unusual mesenchymal neoplasm, with an emphasis on its differential diagnosis.Methods and resultsThe six cases were from three females and three males (age, 20–49 years; median, 42 years). Three tumours were located on the abdominal wall; two from the shoulder/axillary areas, and one on the lateral hip. All presented as slow‐growing subcutaneous nodules, ranging from 26 to 55 mm (median, 40 mm). The tumours consisted of circumscribed, variably cellular nodules composed of relatively bland plump spindled to epithelioid cells arranged singly, in cords, and occasionally in nests, embedded in hyalinised and collagenous stroma. Small hypocellular myxoid zones with ropey collagen fibres were present, as were irregularly dilated, gaping, crescent‐shaped or staghorn‐like thin‐walled vessels, best appreciated at the periphery. Immunohistochemistry for CD34, S100, MUC4 and STAT6 was consistently negative. RNA‐sequencing revealed PRRX1–NCOA1 fusions in all cases. Of the four cases with limited follow‐up (1.5–4 months), none recurred following local surgical excision.ConclusionsThe morphological features of PRRX1–NCOA1‐rearranged fibroblastic tumour overlap with those of RB1‐deficient soft‐tissue tumours, solitary fibrous tumour, and low‐grade fibromyxoid sarcoma/sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. This differential diagnosis can be resolved with a combination of careful morphological study and the application of a panel of immunostains, although molecular genetic study is most definitive. The natural history of PRRX1–NCOA1‐rearranged fibroblastic tumour appears to be quite favourable, although longer‐term study of a larger number of cases is warranted.
Best Practices in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry: Pleomorphic Cutaneous Spindle Cell Tumors
Abstract Context.—Pleomorphic cutaneous spindle cell tumors can be difficult to distinguish solely on histologic grounds. The use of ancillary immunohistochemical studies can greatly assist in this differential diagnosis. Objective.—To review histologic and immunohistochemical aspects of cutaneous spindle cell tumors and discuss a basic panel of markers to assist in the differential diagnosis. Data Sources.—English-language literature published between 1981 and 2005. Conclusions.—A basic immunohistochemistry panel for high-molecular-weight cytokeratin, melanocytic markers (S100 protein, HMB-45, Melan-A), smooth muscle actin, desmin, and endothelial markers (CD31, CD34) is effective in diagnosing most cutaneous spindle cell tumors.
Update on SWI/SNF‐related gynecologic mesenchymal neoplasms: SMARCA4‐deficient uterine sarcoma and SMARCB1‐deficient vulvar neoplasms
AbstractOur knowledge regarding the role of genes encoding the chromatin remodeling switch/sucrose non‐fermenting (SWI/SNF) complex in the initiation and progression of gynecologic malignancies continues to evolve. This review focuses on gynecologic tumors in which the sole or primary genetic alteration is in SMARCA4 or SMARCB1, two members of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. In this review, we present a brief overview of the classical example of such tumors, ovarian small cell carcinoma of hypercalcemic type, and then a detailed review and update of SMARCB1‐deficient and SMARCA4‐deficient tumors of the uterus and vulva.
AbstractBackgroundNonuterine leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are common extremity soft‐tissue sarcomas. Deep LMS are at an increased risk for recurrence; however, few studies have focused on superficial LMS.MethodsWe reviewed the clinicopathological features of 82 patients with a primary superficial LMS. The mean age and follow‐up were 57 ± 15 and 7 ± 5 years. Depth was classified as dermal (based in the skin; n = 35, 43%) and subcutaneous (based below the dermis, above the fascia; n = 47, 57%) on the final resection specimen. Dermal cases were treated with negative margin resection, while subcutaneous tumors were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team for consideration of possible adjuvant therapy.ResultsThe 10‐year disease‐specific survival (DSS) for superficial LMS was 90% with no difference (p = .18) in the 10‐year DSS between patients with dermal (100%) and subcutaneous (86%) LMS. All disease recurrences occurred in subcutaneous LMS (17% vs. 0%, p = .02) and subcutaneous tumors had a worse10‐year metastatic free survival (81% vs. 100%, p = .03).ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that dermal LMS can be managed with a negative margin resection alone. Although the prognosis for patients with subcutaneous LMS is quite favorable, there is some risk for local and distant recurrence, and such patients will benefit from multidisciplinary care.