Sorkin, Donna L.

Purpose: An Adult Cochlear Implant Aural Rehabilitation Special Interest Group was formed in 2023. Members represent interdisciplinary collaborators, including audiologists, speech-language pathologists, surgeons, nonclinical administrators, manufacturer/industry representatives, and researchers. Current perspectives of adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients regarding aural rehabilitation (AR) remain unknown and understudied. The aim of this study is to survey adult CI recipients to determine their perspectives on the AR process. Method: A web-based national survey was sent to adult CI recipients through multiple channels. The survey asked recipients about their demographics, state of residence, hearing loss history, and device configuration. Questions probed recipients' experiences of learning about AR options, services used, definitions of AR, and perceived value of services received. Questions were also asked about barriers to AR services, preoperative counseling, and satisfaction with their decision to pursue a CI. Results: A total of 115 CI recipients responded to the survey. Results revealed a relative lack of information provided to many CI recipients regarding AR services. Many CI recipients reported wishing they had received additional resources in the areas of music training and equipment troubleshooting. Most participants reported that both one-on-one clinician-guided AR and independent listening practice were effective methods of AR. Conclusions: Findings shed light on current gaps in providing the most effective AR services, which will need to be addressed to optimize hearing health care and outcomes for adult CI recipients. Future work should include outreach to a broader representation of CI users to expand our understanding of AR resources, education, and limitations.

Objective: To present key data from a private marketing report that characterizes U.S. cochlear implant (CI) utilization, potential CI candidate and recipient population sizes, and CI market growth. Patients: Individuals who may benefit from CI and CI recipients in the United States. Interventions: Cochlear implantation. Main outcome measures: CI utilization, potential CI candidate and recipient population sizes, and CI market size and value. Results: As of 2015, a cumulative 170,252 people (240,056 devices) had undergone cochlear implantation in the United States. In the year 2015, approximately 30% of devices were implanted in bilateral CI patients, through simultaneous or sequential implantation. When considering traditional audiometric CI candidacy criteria (patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss in the better hearing ear), utilization rates among the population who may benefit from CI approximated 12.7%. When considering expanded criteria including individuals with single-sided deafness or asymmetrical hearing loss (severe to profound hearing loss in the worse hearing ear), utilization rates approximated 2.1%. In 2015, there was a net increase of 20,093 individuals who may have benefited from CI who had not undergone CI, adding to the group of about 1.3 M untreated audiometric CI candidates who existed prior to that year. The CI market was valued at $450.8 M in 2015, with an average device selling price of $25,701 per device. Conclusions: CI utilization rates remain low among individuals who meet audiometric criteria for CI. Although the annual proportion of CI recipients to new audiometric candidates has increased, the total population of untreated audiometric CI candidates continues to rise.

AbstractPersistent underutilization of cochlear implants (CIs) in the United States is in part a reflection of a lack of hearing health knowledge and the complexities of care delivery in the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. An evaluation of the patient experience through the CI health care delivery process systematically exposes barriers that must be overcome to undergo treatment for moderate-to-severe hearing loss. This review analyzes patient-facing obstacles including diagnosis of hearing loss, CI candidate identification and referral to surgeon, CI evaluation and candidacy criteria interpretation, and lastly CI surgery and rehabilitation. Pervasive throughout the process are several themes which demand attention in addressing inequities in hearing health disparities in the United States.