Anderson, Glenda G.

Abstract Context. —Molecular diagnostic applications that use microarrays to analyze large numbers of genes simultaneously require high-quality mRNA. As these genome-wide expression assays become more commonly used in medical practice, pathologists and oncologists will benefit from understanding the importance of obtaining high-quality RNA in order to generate reliable diagnostic and prognostic information, especially as these relate to cancer. Objective. —To review the effects that different tissue preservation techniques have on RNA quality and to provide practical advice on changes in tissue acquisition and handling that may soon be needed for certain clinical situations. Data Sources. —A review of recent literature on RNA quality, tissue fixation, cancer diagnosis, and gene expression analysis. Conclusions. —Studies have consistently shown that frozen tissue yields more intact RNA than formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. The chemical modification, cross-linking, and fragmentation caused by formalin fixation often render RNA unsuitable for microarray analysis. Thus, when expression analysis involving hundreds or more than 1000 gene markers is contemplated, pathologists should consider freezing a specimen within half an hour (preferably within minutes) of surgical resection and storing it at −80°C or below. In coming years, pathologists will need to work closely with oncologists and other clinicians to determine when saving frozen tissue for microarray expression analysis is both practical and necessary. In select cases, the benefit of implementing a few extra tissue-handling steps may improve diagnostic and prognostic capability.

Purpose Malignancies found in unexpected locations or with poorly differentiated morphologies can pose a significant challenge for tissue of origin determination. Current histologic and imaging techniques fail to yield definitive identification of the tissue of origin in a significant number of cases. The aim of this study was to validate a predefined 1,550-gene expression profile for this purpose. Methods Four institutions processed 547 frozen specimens representing 15 tissues of origin using oligonucleotide microarrays. Half of the specimens were metastatic tumors, with the remainder being poorly differentiated and undifferentiated primary cancers chosen to resemble those that present as a clinical challenge. Results In this blinded multicenter validation study the 1,550-gene expression profile was highly informative in tissue determination. The study found overall sensitivity (positive percent agreement with reference diagnosis) of 87.8% (95% CI, 84.7% to 90.4%) and overall specificity (negative percent agreement with reference diagnosis) of 99.4% (95% CI, 98.3% to 99.9%). Performance within the subgroup of metastatic tumors (n = 258) was found to be slightly lower than that of the poorly differentiated and undifferentiated primary tumor subgroup, 84.5% and 90.7%, respectively (P = .04). Differences between individual laboratories were not statistically significant. Conclusion This study represents the first adequately sized, multicenter validation of a gene-expression profile for tissue of origin determination restricted to poorly differentiated and undifferentiated primary cancers and metastatic tumors. These results indicate that this profile should be a valuable addition or alternative to currently available diagnostic methods for the evaluation of uncertain primary cancers.