Back to Authors

Lewis, Julia B.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1530-7115

Mayo Clinic

Vanderbilt University

Citations 3

Effects of Acoramidis on Kidney Function in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy
Testani, Jeffrey M. , Judge, Daniel P. , Borlaug, Barry A. , Cherney, David Z.I. , Gillmore, Julian D. , Lewis, Julia B. , Adler, Scott, Cao, Xiaofan , Castaño, Adam , Fox, Jonathan C. , Katz, Leonid , Mathur, V, Xiong, Kuangnan, Masri, Ahmad , Cherney, David , Cox, Zachary L , Gillmore, Julian D , Lewis, Julia B , Adler, Scott H , Cao, Xiaofan , Castaño, Adam , Fox, Jonathan C , Xiong, Kuangnan , Butler, Javed , Masri, Ahmad , Borlaug, Barry A , Testani, Jeffrey M , Judge, Daniel P , Mathur, Vandana S. , Butler, Javed

Circulation: Heart Failure | July 2, 2026 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circheartfailure.126.014656 Get It

BACKGROUND: Acoramidis achieves near-complete (≥90%) transthyretin stabilization and is approved to reduce cardiovascular-related mortality and hospitalization in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Its effects on kidney function are not well characterized. METHODS: Data from randomized phase 2 (N=49) and phase 3 (N=632) studies in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy were included. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope was generated using a linear spline mixed-effects model. The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was measured longitudinally. Relationships between changes in kidney function and clinical outcomes were explored using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Acoramidis initiation resulted in a modest acute dip in eGFR that was dose-dependent, reversible, and not associated with adverse kidney-related events. At Day 28, the mean (±SE) dip in eGFR from baseline with acoramidis was 8.5±0.48 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ; the placebo-corrected reduction in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was 15.5% (95% CI, 0.4%–28.4%; P =0.044). The rate of decline in kidney function (chronic eGFR slope) was significantly improved with acoramidis versus placebo (−1.01 versus −3.48 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 per year; P <0.001), and the reduction in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was sustained (13.7% [95% CI, 1.7%–24.2%]; P =0.026) over time. Concomitant tafamidis use did not influence the chronic eGFR slope in either arm. Comparing acoramidis versus placebo subgroups with acute eGFR dips ≥ the median (4.89 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ) favored acoramidis for all-cause mortality or cardiovascular-related hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.22–0.78]; P =0.006; P interaction=0.043) and cardiovascular-related hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.17–0.66]; P =0.002, P interaction=0.025). Within the placebo arm, eGFR dips portended worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Acoramidis initiation resulted in an acute dip in eGFR and reductions in both the chronic eGFR slope and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio versus placebo without adverse kidney-related events. Acoramidis effects on kidney function may be mediated through direct kidney-protective hemodynamic effects. Importantly, the acute dip in eGFR was associated with a reduced risk of adverse clinical outcomes within the first year. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT03458130, NCT03536767, NCT03860935, NCT04988386.
Change in Albuminuria and GFR Slope as Joint Surrogate End Points for Kidney Failure: Implications for Phase 2 Clinical Trials in CKD
Heerspink, Hiddo J.L. , Inker, Lesley A. , Collier, Willem , Haaland, Benjamin , Luo, Jiyu , Appel, Gerald B., Estacio, Raymond O. , Fervenza, Fernando C. , Floege, Jürgen , Imai, Enyu , Jafar, Tazeen H. , Lewis, Julia B. , Li, Philip Kam‐Tao , Maes, Bart , Praga, Manuel , CT, on behalf of CKD-EPI, Floege, Jürgen , Luo, Jiyu , Fervenza, Fernando, Li, Philip Kam-Tao , Torres, Vicente E , Greene, Tom , Fervenza, Fernando C , Tighiouart, Hocine , Chan, Tak Mao , Locatelli, Francesco , Perna, Annalisa , Perrone, Ronald D. , Schena, Francesco Paolo , Wanner, Christoph , Xie, Di, Greene, Tom , CT, on behalf of CKD-EPI

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology | March 15, 2023 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 955-968

10.1681/asn.0000000000000117 Get It

Significance Statement Changes in albuminuria and GFR slope are individually used as surrogate end points in clinical trials of CKD progression, and studies have demonstrated that each is associated with treatment effects on clinical end points. In this study, the authors sought to develop a conceptual framework that combines both surrogate end points to better predict treatment effects on clinical end points in Phase 2 trials. The results demonstrate that information from the combined treatment effects on albuminuria and GFR slope improves the prediction of treatment effects on the clinical end point for Phase 2 trials with sample sizes between 100 and 200 patients and duration of follow-up ranging from 1 to 2 years. These findings may help inform design of clinical trials for interventions aimed at slowing CKD progression. Background Changes in log urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and GFR slope are individually used as surrogate end points in clinical trials of CKD progression. Whether combining these surrogate end points might strengthen inferences about clinical benefit is unknown. Methods Using Bayesian meta-regressions across 41 randomized trials of CKD progression, we characterized the combined relationship between the treatment effects on the clinical end point (sustained doubling of serum creatinine, GFR <15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , or kidney failure) and treatment effects on UACR change and chronic GFR slope after 3 months. We applied the results to the design of Phase 2 trials on the basis of UACR change and chronic GFR slope in combination. Results Treatment effects on the clinical end point were strongly associated with the combination of treatment effects on UACR change and chronic slope. The posterior median meta-regression coefficients for treatment effects were −0.41 (95% Bayesian Credible Interval, −0.64 to −0.17) per 1 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year for the treatment effect on GFR slope and −0.06 (95% Bayesian Credible Interval, −0.90 to 0.77) for the treatment effect on UACR change. The predicted probability of clinical benefit when considering both surrogates was determined primarily by estimated treatment effects on UACR when sample size was small (approximately 60 patients per treatment arm) and follow-up brief (approximately 1 year), with the importance of GFR slope increasing for larger sample sizes and longer follow-up. Conclusions In Phase 2 trials of CKD with sample sizes of 100–200 patients per arm and follow-up between 1 and 2 years, combining information from treatment effects on UACR change and GFR slope improved the prediction of treatment effects on clinical end points.
Acute Treatment Effects on GFR in Randomized Clinical Trials of Kidney Disease Progression
Neuen, Brendon L. , Vonesh, Edward F. , Chaudhari, Juhi, Miao, Shiyuan , Fervenza, Fernando C. , Floege, Jürgen , Goicoechea, Marián , Imai, Enyu , Jafar, Tazeen H. , Lewis, Julia B. , Li, Philip Kam‐Tao , Locatelli, Francesco , Maes, Bart , Praga, Manuel , Woodward, Mark , Xie, Di , Inker, Lesley A. , Floege, Jürgen , Herrington, William G , Li, Philip Kam-Tao , Torres, Vicente E , Wanner, Christoph , Woodward, Mark , Greene, Tom , Fervenza, Fernando C , Tighiouart, Hocine , Heerspink, Hiddo J.L. , Chan, Tak Mao , Perrone, Ronald D. , Perna, Annalisa , Schena, Francesco Paolo , Wetzels, Jack F.M. , Greene, Tom

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology | December 3, 2021 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 291-303

10.1681/asn.2021070948 Get It

Background Acute changes in GFR can occur after initiation of interventions targeting progression of CKD. These acute changes complicate the interpretation of long-term treatment effects. Methods To assess the magnitude and consistency of acute effects in randomized clinical trials and explore factors that might affect them, we performed a meta-analysis of 53 randomized clinical trials for CKD progression, enrolling 56,413 participants with at least one estimated GFR measurement by 6 months after randomization. We defined acute treatment effects as the mean difference in GFR slope from baseline to 3 months between randomized groups. We performed univariable and multivariable metaregression to assess the effect of intervention type, disease state, baseline GFR, and albuminuria on the magnitude of acute effects. Results The mean acute effect across all studies was −0.21 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (95% confidence interval, −0.63 to 0.22) over 3 months, with substantial heterogeneity across interventions (95% coverage interval across studies, −2.50 to +2.08 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ). We observed negative average acute effects in renin angiotensin system blockade, BP lowering, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor trials, and positive acute effects in trials of immunosuppressive agents. Larger negative acute effects were observed in trials with a higher mean baseline GFR. Conclusion The magnitude and consistency of acute GFR effects vary across different interventions, and are larger at higher baseline GFR. Understanding the nature and magnitude of acute effects can help inform the optimal design of randomized clinical trials evaluating disease progression in CKD.