Woolley, Sandra M.

Operating room throughput variability with spinal procedures revealed task inefficiency and potential safety concerns. Using the DMAIC framework (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control), a transdisciplinary team conducted a quality improvement (QI) research project to identify and address safety concerns with prone patient positioning. The main problem with patient positioning was undefined standard practice. Clinicians reported prone patient positioning for spinal surgery patients is physically demanding. Thus, the team conducted a rapid upper limb assessment for injury risk during patient positioning and identified a greater risk of clinician injury in the manual transfer process. The QI research team recommended the mechanical process of rotating patients with the Jackson Table to improve workload for the Surgical Team and developed training and design enhancements to support this workflow. The DMAIC quality framework enabled clinician collaboration with researchers to develop interventions to support a standardized process during prone patient positioning with the Jackson Table.

Medical care providers recognize nonadjustable examination tables in clinics as a barrier to comprehensively and safely providing routine healthcare for disabled, elderly and obese patients. The aim of this study was to understand how the availability of the adjustable examination table may affect the medical care provider’s perception of the quality of care provided to patients who need physical assistance. Fifty providers answered questionnaires to report their perceptions of two different examination tables’ usability. The first one is a mid-century industrial designed table and the other adjustable and ADA compliant, as used in a community health clinic. Before implementation of the new adjustable examination table, 34 medical care providers provided feedback on their experiences with nonadjustable examination tables. A second survey was administered approximately six months after implementation of the new adjustable examination tables to 16 medical care providers (with 2 indicating participation in the prior-to-implementation survey) for their feedback on experiences with the new adjustable examination tables. Providers reported significantly (p<0.05) more comfort in getting typical patients (27%), bariatric patients (50%), and geriatric patients (30%) into a sitting position when they used the adjustable examination table compared to the nonadjustable examination table. Providers considered the adjustable examination tables to have a more ideal width (60%) and length (64%) to accommodate a wider variety of patients than the nonadjustable examination tables. Providers also considered the adjustable table (33%) easier to use and preferable to the nonadjustable table. This research showed how the adjustable examination table improves healthcare provider experience to provide access to healthcare for patients with disabilities with better ergonomics and greater safety for both patients and providers.