Back to Authors

Myers, Robert P.

Mayo Clinic

Gilead Sciences (United States)

Citations 52

Editorial Comments
Myers, Robert P.

Journal of Urology | June 30, 2017 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 78-78

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39372-2 Get It

Improving the Exposure of the Prostate in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Longitudinal Bunching of the Deep Venous Plexus
Myers, Robert P.

Journal of Urology | June 30, 2017 | Volume: 142 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1282-1284

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39057-2 Get It

Hormonal Treatment at Time of Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy for Stage D1 Prostate Cancer: Results of Long-Term Followup
Myers, Robert P., Larson-Keller, Jeffrey J., Bergstralh, Erik J., Zincke, Horst, Oesterling, Joseph E., Lieber, Michael M.

Journal of Urology | June 29, 2017 | Volume: 147 | Issue: 3 Part 2 | Pages: 910-915

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37420-7 Get It

Prostate Specific Antigen Values after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate: Impact of Adjuvant Treatment (Hormonal and Radiation)
Morgan, William R. , Zincke, Horst, Rainwater, Leslie M., Myers, Robert P., Klee, George G.

Journal of Urology | June 29, 2017 | Volume: 145 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 319-323

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38327-1 Get It

Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate Involving 2 Cell Types (Prostate Specific Antigen Producing and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Producing) with Selective Metastatic Spread
Guthman, David A., Farrow, George M., Myers, Robert P., Ferrigni, Robert G., Lieber, Michael M.

Journal of Urology | June 29, 2017 | Volume: 146 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 854-856

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37943-0 Get It

Anatomical Variation of the Superficial Preprostatic Veins with Respect to Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
Myers, Robert P.

Journal of Urology | June 29, 2017 | Volume: 145 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 992-993

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38510-5 Get It

Nuclear Deoxyribonucleic Acid Ploidy and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in Operable Prostatic Adenocarcinoma
Nativ, Ofer, Myers, Robert P., Farrow, George M., Therneau, Terry M. , Zincke, Horst, Lieber, Michael M.

Journal of Urology | June 29, 2017 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 2 Part 1 | Pages: 303-306

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39437-5 Get It

Cystectomy After Radiotherapeutic Ablation of Invasive Transitional Cell Cancer
DeWeerd, James H., Colby, Malcolm Y., Myers, Robert P., Cupps, Roger E.

Journal of Urology | June 29, 2017 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 260-261

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)57966-5 Get It

Prostate Shape, External Striated Urethral Sphincter and Radical Prostatectomy: The Apical Dissection
Myers, Robert P., Goellner, John R., Cahill, Donald R.

Journal of Urology | June 29, 2017 | Volume: 138 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 543-550

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43253-8 Get It

Preoperative Prediction of Surgical Margin Status in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated by Radical Prostatectomy
Cheng, Liang , Bergstralh, Erik J., Myers, Robert P., Zincke, Horst, Bostwick, David G., Slezak, Jeff M. , Cheng, Liang

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 2862-2868

10.1200/jco.2000.18.15.2862 Get It

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the preoperative factors associated with surgical margin status in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 339 patients who were treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Mayo Clinic. None received preoperative adjuvant therapy. The mean age at the time of surgery was 66 years (range, 45 to 79 years). All specimens were totally embedded and whole-mounted. Positive surgical margin was defined as the presence of cancer cells at the inked margins. Numerous pathologic characteristics in needle biopsies and preoperative clinical findings were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall margin positivity rate was 24%. In univariate analysis, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, perineural invasion, percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens, and number and percentage of biopsy cores involved by cancer were all associated with positive surgical margins. In multivariate analysis, preoperative serum PSA level (odds ratio for a doubling of PSA levels, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.4; P < .001) and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens (odds ratio for a 10% increase, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 1.4; P < .001) were predictive of margin status in radical prostatectomy. With use of preoperative serum PSA level and percentage of cancer in the biopsy as predictors of surgical margins, the overall accuracy as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.74. CONCLUSION: Preoperative serum PSA level and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens were independently associated with surgical margin status in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. The combination of these two factors provides a high level of predictive accuracy for margin status.