Santisteban, Marta

Abstract PURPOSE: Hedgehog (HH) pathway has been implicated in maintenace and survival of breast cancer and cancer stem cells, EMT regulation, breast carcinogenesis and resistance to chemoradiation in solid tumors. Dysregulation of this pathway occurs in more than 50% of breast cancers. We have already demonstrated that immune-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) leads to the generation of breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) from a parental epithelial breast cancer cell line in an in vivo murine model (Cancer Research 2009). The aim of our study is to demonstrate that resistance in the BCSCs is linked to HH hyperactivation and that the selective blockade of this pathway could eradicate this subpopulation of BCSCs in preclinical models. METHODS: One parental epithelial (E) and three mesenchymal BCSCs cell lines (M1, M2 and M3) were used for all the in vitro experiments. qRT-PCR was used to quantify the expression of the gene components of the pathway and gene targets. Measurement of Gli1, caspase 3 and Cyclin D1 protein expression was determined by Western blot. Cell viability assays were performed with Paclitaxel and the HH inhibitor GDC-0449. Apoptosis assays were performed when cell lines were treated with paclitaxel (10nM), GDC-0449 (25uM) or the combination of them. For the in vivo xenografted mouse model, 106 cells (E and M2) were inoculated sc respectively into the flank of 6–8 week-old syngeneic female FVB/N-TgN (MMTVneu) 202Mul/J mice. Treatment was started on daily GDC-0449 (ip), paclitaxel (ip on days 1, 4 and 8) or both drugs when tumors reached 0.5 cm2. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Activity of the HH measured by the expression of Gli1 was increased in BCSC cell lines as compared to E cell line (p < 0.001). This was antagonized as expected by treatment with GDC-0449. Reporter and expression assay showed that GDC-0449 decreases Gli1 transcriptional activity and levels of a HH downstream target gene, cyclin D1. In all BCSC lines (but not in the E cell line), a synergistic effect was showed with the combination treatment as compared to control (p ≤ 0.01) and to paclitaxel or GDC-0449 alone (p ≤ 0.05 respectively) as well as a highly increased apoptotic activity (p ≤ 0.001 with control and p ≤ 0.05 with monotherapy). Tumors derived from M2 injection regressed when the combination schedule was administered (p ≤ 0.05) at 2 weeks after the start of the treatment. CONCLUSION: The inhibition of the HH pathway with GDC-0449 plus paclitaxel demonstrates a synergistic therapeutic effect in comparison to monotherapy, as shown by increased apoptotic activity, cell cycle arrest and significant reduction of tumor size in vivo. Together these results provide the rationale for future clinical trials including the blockade HH and standard chemotherapy in order to eradicate the whole population of tumor cells (also BCSCs) within the tumors and avoid disease relapse and metastasis in breast cancer patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-03-07.

Abstract p16, a nuclear protein encoded by the p16INK4a gene, is a regulator of cell-cycle regulation. Previous studies have shown that expression of p16 in tissue biopsies of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is associated with increased risk of breast cancer, particularly when considered in combination with other markers such as Ki-67 and COX-2. Here, we evaluated how expression of p16 in breast tissue biopsies of women with atypical hyperplasia (AH), a putative precursor lesion to DCIS, is associated with subsequent development of cancer. p16 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in archival sections from 233 women with AH diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic. p16 expression in the atypical lesions was scored by percentage of positive cells and intensity of staining. We also studied coexpression of p16, with Ki-67 and COX-2, biomarkers of progression in AH. Risk factor and follow-up data were obtained via study questionnaire and medical records. Forty-seven patients (20%) developed breast cancer with a median follow-up of 14.5 years. Staining of p16 was increased in older patients relative to younger patients (P = 0.0025). Although risk of developing breast cancer was not associated with increased p16 expression, joint overexpression of Ki-67 and COX-2 was found to convey stronger risk of breast cancer in the first 10 years after diagnosis as compared with one negative marker (P < 0.01). However, the addition of p16 levels did not strengthen this association. p16 overexpression, either alone or in combination with COX-2 and Ki-67, does not significantly stratify breast cancer risk in women with AH. Cancer Prev Res; 4(12); 1953–60. ©2011 AACR.

Abstract Background: p16 is a nuclear protein encoded by the p16INK4a gene that regulates the G1-S cell cycle checkpoint. Its overexpression could reflect normal proliferative arrest, but also the evolution of carcinogenic processes that have overcome the p16 block, with progression from hyperplasic lesions to invasive breast cancer. Our aim with this study was to correlate p16 expression, both individually and in combination with expression of COX-2 and Ki67, with subsequent risk of breast cancer among women with atypical hyperplasia. Methods: p16 expression was assessed by immunohistochemical assays in archival paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed sections from 233 women with atypia whose biopsy specimens were obtained via surgical excision at the Mayo Clinic from January 1, 1967, through December 31, 1991. p16 expression was scored as percent of cells positive and intensity of staining. Risk factor information and follow-up for breast cancer events were obtained via study questionnaire and the medical records. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were used to compare observed numbers of breast cancer events to population-based expected counts, both at 10 years and over the entire course of follow-up. Results: Forty-seven patients (20%) developed breast cancer with a mean follow-up of 14.3 (SD=6.96) years. The overall risk of developing breast cancer was not modified by increasing p16 overexpression (low percent of staining with RR=3.89, 95% CI=2.72 to 5.56; high percent of staining with RR=3.91, 95% CI=2.43 to 6.28; similar results for intensity of staining). However, overexpression of both p16 and COX2 conveyed a stronger risk of breast cancer (SIR=4.01, 95% CI 2.28 to 7.07) as compared to dual low expression (SIR 1.78, 95% CI 0.67-4.74). Moreover, overexpression of both Ki67 and p16 was related to a higher 10-year breast cancer risk (SIR 6.25, 95% CI 2.35-16.6) as compared to low expression of both markers (SIR 0.87, 95% CI 0.22-3.49). Conclusions: although single expression of p16 does not stratify breast cancer risk, its overexpression in concert with biomarkers that reflect other carcinogenic processes (e.g. Ki67 and COX2) could help to define risk of tumor development. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 910.

Abstract Background: Uncontrolled proliferation is a defining feature of the malignant phenotype. Ki67 is a marker for proliferating cells and is overexpressed in many breast cancers. Atypical hyperplasia is a premalignant lesion of the breast (relative risk ∼ 4.0). Here we asked if Ki67 expression could stratify risk in women with atypia.Methods: Ki67 expression was assessed immunohistochemically by digital image analysis in archival sections from 192 women with atypia diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic 1/1/67-12/31/91. Risk factor and follow-up data were obtained via study questionnaire and medical records. Observed breast cancer events were compared to population expected rates (Iowa SEER) using standarized incidence ratios (SIRs). We examined both short-term (within 10 years) and long-term (after 10 years) risk of breast cancer (BC) following atypia biopsy.Results: The median value for percent positive cells for Ki67 was 1.0%; the 75th percentile value was 2.3%. Based on the empirical distribution of staining values in our cohort, we selected a cutoff of 2% cells positive to separate high from low staining. There were no differences in Ki67 levels by age at biopsy, type of atypia (ADH, ALH, or both), number of foci of atypia, or family history. 32 women developed BC over a median of 14.6 years. Among them, those with ≥2% Ki67 expression had a shorter time to breast cancer (median 5.5 years, IQR=3.2-7.2) than those with <2% cells positive (median=13.8 years, IQR=11.6-20.3). There was a positive association between Ki67 overexpression (≥2% of cells positive) and risk of BC in the first 10 years of follow-up (SIR=4.42 [95% CI 2.21-8.84]). This excess risk resulted in a 10-year cumulative incidence of 14.1%. In contrast, in the women with low Ki67 expression, we found no increased risk of BC in the first 10 years, with SIR 1.01 (95% CI 0.38-2.70), which was significantly lower than the women with high expression (p=0.01). The 10-year cumulative incidence of BC was 3% for the low Ki67group, in line with population averages. After 10 years, risk increased significantly in the low Ki67 group [SIR 5.69 (3.63-8.92)] vs. no increased risk in the high Ki67 group [SIR 0.78 (0.11-5.55)]. We formally examined this apparent time-dependent difference in incidence patterns by Ki67 staining levels via Poisson regression analysis, and found a statistically significant interaction between pre- vs. post-10 years incidence and high vs. low staining levels (p<0.001).Conclusions: Ki67 appears to be a time-varying biomarker of risk of breast cancer in women with atypical hyperplasia. Women whose atypias show higher proliferation rates have an increased risk for an earlier BC (within 10 years). Those with lower proliferation rates tend to develop BCs later, after 10 years. Ki67 levels may help to define the time period of greatest risk for women with atypia. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 909.

Abstract The breast cancer stem cell (BCSC) hypotheses suggest that breast cancer is derived from a single tumor-initiating cell with stem-like properties, but the source of these cells is unclear. We previously observed that induction of an immune response against an epithelial breast cancer led in vivo to the T-cell–dependent outgrowth of a tumor, the cells of which had undergone epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). The resulting mesenchymal tumor cells had a CD24−/loCD44+ phenotype, consistent with BCSCs. In the present study, we found that EMT was induced by CD8 T cells and the resulting tumors had characteristics of BCSCs, including potent tumorigenicity, ability to reestablish an epithelial tumor, and enhanced resistance to drugs and radiation. In contrast to the hierarchal cancer stem cell hypothesis, which suggests that breast cancer arises from the transformation of a resident tissue stem cell, our results show that EMT can produce the BCSC phenotype. These findings have several important implications related to disease progression and relapse. [Cancer Res 2009;69(7):2887–95]