Wang, Lu

Bivalirudin offers several important advantages of relevance to the management of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients. This multicenter retrospective analysis evaluated the bivalirudin dosing in pediatric ECMO and correlated these doses with the severity of renal dysfunction. A total of 75 patients were included in this analyses: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 29), eGFR 30–60 (n = 18), eGFR < 30 (n = 28), and of those 23 were on renal replacement therapy (RRT). The initial bivalirudin dose used to reach therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with eGFR > 60 was significantly higher than the dose required in those with renal impairment (0.25 mg/kg/hr in patients with eGFR > 60 and 0.19 mg/kg/hr in patients on RRT, 0.18 mg/kg/hr in patients with eGFR 30–60 and 0.13 mg/kg/hr in patients with eGFR < 30 with no RRT). Progressive dose escalations (two to threefold increase) were required to maintain therapeutic range over the initial 4 days of ECMO that coincided with improving renal creatinine clearance during that same time period. Establishing an initial starting dose of bivalirudin contingent upon eGFR is essential for the rapid achievement of target anticoagulation intensity. Further dose adjustments guided by laboratory monitoring is necessary given the dynamic changes in creatinine clearance following ECMO initiation.

Abstract Background The extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit causes pharmacokinetic alterations of medications which impact drug selection and dosing. Although hydromorphone has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, it is unclear whether hydromorphone provides better patient‐centered benefits compared to fentanyl. The objective of this study is to compare opioid and sedative requirements in ECMO patients started on a fentanyl‐ versus hydromorphone‐based analgesia regimen. Methods This was a non‐interventional retrospective cohort study. It was conducted at a single center in the cardiovascular intensive care units and cardiac intensive care units. We included venovenous (VV) or venoarterial ECMO patients. Patients who were started on a fentanyl continuous infusion within 24 h of cannulation were compared to patients started on a hydromorphone continuous infusion. Results A linear mixed effects model was performed to compare doses of opioid, sedative, and propofol between groups over time. We included 28 hydromorphone patients and 53 fentanyl patients, with 85% on VV ECMO. There were no differences between hydromorphone and fentanyl groups in opioid or sedative (including propofol and benzodiazepine) doses for any ECMO day ( p value for interaction .63 and .83, respectively). Propofol doses alone, however, were significantly higher in the fentanyl group on ECMO days three, four, and five. Conclusions There appear to be no major differences in opioid or sedative requirements whether ECMO patients are initiated on a hydromorphone‐ or fentanyl‐based regimen.