Aabedi, Alexander A.

OBJECTIVE Prior studies have revealed that a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 is associated with worse outcomes following surgical intervention in grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis. Using a machine learning approach, this study aimed to leverage the prospective Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) to identify a BMI threshold for patients undergoing surgical intervention for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis and thus reliably identify optimal surgical candidates among obese patients. METHODS Patients with grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis and preoperative BMI ≥ 30 from the prospectively collected QOD lumbar spondylolisthesis module were included in this study. A 12-month composite outcome was generated by performing principal components analysis and k-means clustering on four validated measures of surgical outcomes in patients with spondylolisthesis. Random forests were generated to determine the most important preoperative patient characteristics in predicting the composite outcome. Recursive partitioning was used to extract a BMI threshold associated with optimal outcomes. RESULTS The average BMI was 35.7, with 282 (46.4%) of the 608 patients from the QOD data set having a BMI ≥ 30. Principal components analysis revealed that the first principal component accounted for 99.2% of the variance in the four outcome measures. Two clusters were identified corresponding to patients with suboptimal outcomes (severe back pain, increased disability, impaired quality of life, and low satisfaction) and to those with optimal outcomes. Recursive partitioning established a BMI threshold of 37.5 after pruning via cross-validation. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter study, the authors found that a BMI ≤ 37.5 was associated with improved patient outcomes following surgical intervention. These findings may help augment predictive analytics to deliver precision medicine and improve prehabilitation strategies.

BACKGROUND: Increases in the extent of resection of both contrast-enhanced (CE) and non–contrast-enhanced (NCE) tissue are associated with substantial survival benefits in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma. The fact, however, remains that these lesions exist within the framework of complex neural circuitry subserving cognition, movement, and behavior, all of which affect the ultimate survival outcome. The prognostic significance of the interplay between CE and NCE cytoreduction and neurological morbidity is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To identify a clinically homogenous population of 228 patients with newly diagnosed isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma, all of whom underwent maximal safe resection of CE and NCE tissue and adjuvant chemoradiation. We then set out to delineate the competing interactions between resection of CE and NCE tissue and postoperative neurological impairment with respect to overall survival. METHODS: Nonparametric multivariate models of survival were generated via recursive partitioning to provide a clinically intuitive framework for the prognostication and surgical management of such patients. RESULTS: We demonstrated that the presence of a new postoperative neurological impairment was the key factor in predicting survival outcomes across the entire cohort. Patients older than 60 yr who suffered from at least one new impairment had the worst survival outcome regardless of extent of resection (median of 11.6 mo), whereas those who did not develop a new impairment had the best outcome (median of 28.4 mo) so long as all CE tissue was resected. CONCLUSION: Our data provide novel evidence for management strategies that prioritize safe and complete resection of CE tissue.

Abstract INTRODUCTION The NIH Revitalization Act, implemented 29 years ago, set to improve the representation of women and minorities in clinical trials. In this study, we investigate the progress made in neuro-oncology in all phase therapeutic clinical trials for neuro-epithelial central nervous system tumors in comparison to their demographic-specific age-adjusted disease incidence and mortality. METHODS Registry study of all published clinical trials for World Health Organization (WHO) defined neuro-epithelial CNS tumors between January 2000 and December 2019. Study participants for trials were obtained from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. Population-based data from the CBTRUS for incidence analyses. SEER-18 Incidence-Based Mortality data was used for mortality analysis. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact, and c2 tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS Among 662 published clinical trial articles representing 49, 907 accrued participants, 62.5% of study participants were men and 37.5% were women (P< 0.0001) representing a mortality specific over-accrual for men (P= 0.001) and under-accrual for women (P= 0.001). Whites, Asians, Blacks, and Hispanics represented 91.7%, 1.5%, 2.6%, and 1.7% of trial participants. Compared with their US cancer mortality, Blacks (47% of expected mortality, P=.008), Hispanics (17% of expected mortality, P< .001) and Asians (33% of expected mortality, P< .001) were underrepresented compared with Whites (114% of expected mortality, P< .001). CONCLUSIONS Nearly 30 years since the Revitalization Act, minorities and women are consistently underrepresented when compared with their demographic-specific incidence and mortality in therapeutic clinical trials for neuroepithelial tumors. This study provides a framework for investigating cancer clinical trial accrual and offers guidance regarding workforce factors associated with enrollment of vulnerable patients.