Barrett, Kevin M.

Despite the growing demand for emergency neurological evaluations and neurohospitalists, the supply of neurologists remains relatively fixed over time. Telemedicine is a unique tool that has the ability to put a medical specialist like a neurologist in 2 places in a relatively short period of time, expanding expertise in many rural and in some underserved urban facilities that would ordinarily be devoid of such expertise. Teleneurology is a branch of telemedicine that consults and practices through remote neurological evaluation. Telestroke is defined as remote stroke evaluation. The demand for timely neurological evaluation, especially acute stroke evaluation and treatment with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV rtPA), continues to fuel the growth of neurohospitalists, telestroke, and teleneurology services. Remote, rural, or underserved urban emergency departments and hospitals which are unable to successfully recruit a neurologist or neurohospitalist to provide this service are uniquely suited to a teleneurology option. The number of private practices and academic centers providing telestroke services has grown significantly in the past decade with continued growth expected. We describe the benefits and drawbacks of teleneurology/telestroke, as well as other practical aspects for the teleneurohospitalist.

Neurohospitalists are an emerging subspecialty group in neurology. 1 A recent survey of neurohospitalists found 75% of respondents had completed general neurology residency plus additional fellowship training (54% vascular neurology, 13% neurocritical care, and 33% other). 2 A limited number of neurohospitalist fellowship positions 3 , 4 are offered in the United States, however, a standardized curriculum or subspecialty certification examination does not currently exist. Given the recent dialogue surrounding the utility of neurohospitalist fellowship training, the purpose of this article is to provide 2 contrasting perspectives on the perceived need for neurohospitalist fellowship training.

Background: Neurohospitalists may improve the efficiency and quality of care delivered to hospitalized patients with neurological disease. However, there is limited systematic data to support this hypothesis. The primary purpose of this study was to compare length of stay (LOS) for patients with ischemic stroke cared for by either neurohospitalists or community-based neurologists at a single institution. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients with ischemic stroke discharged from St. Luke’s Hospital in Jacksonville, Florida, between January 2006 and December 2007. The LOS for patients cared for by neurohospitalists was compared to the LOS for patients cared for by community neurologists. Compliance with Joint Commission inpatient stroke quality metrics was also compared. Results: A total of 533 patients were discharged with a principal diagnosis of ischemic stroke over the 24-month study period. Neurohospitalists cared for 313 patients with mean (± SD) LOS of 4.9 (5.2) days (95% CI: 4.3-5.5 days), and community-based neurologists cared for 220 patients with a mean LOS of 6.5 (8.2) days (95% CI: 5.4-7.6 days). The mean LOS was significantly less for the neurohospitalists compared to the community-based neurologists ( P = .005). Neurohospitalists achieved a higher compliance rate in 10 of 11 inpatient stroke quality metrics and achieved significantly higher compliance rate of smoking cessation education ( P = .019). Conclusions: Neurohospitalists achieved significantly shorter LOS for patients with ischemic stroke compared to community-based neurologists. These data suggest that neurohospitalists can also improve compliance with quality metrics necessary for Joint Commission Primary Stroke Center designation.

Background and Purpose— Warfarin reduces stroke risk by approximately 60% in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Differences in awareness and treatment of AF may contribute to racial and geographic disparities in stroke mortality. The objective was to examine predictors of awareness of the diagnosis of AF and treatment with warfarin. Methods— RE asons for G eographic a nd R acial D ifferences in S troke (REGARDS) is a national, population-based, longitudinal study of 30 239 blacks and whites ≥45 years old with oversampling from blacks and the southeastern stroke belt states. Participants were enrolled January 2003 to October 2007. Data were collected using telephone interview, in-home evaluation, and self-administered questionnaires. The main variable of awareness of AF was defined by a positive answer to “Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you had atrial fibrillation?” and whether there was evidence of treatment on the basis of an in-home medications inventory. Results— From baseline electrocardiograms, 432 individuals (88 black and 344 white) had AF. Of these, 88% (360 of 409) had at least 1 additional CHADS 2 stroke risk factor and 60% (258 of 432) were aware of their AF. The odds of blacks being aware of their AF were one third that of whites (OR=0.32; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.52). Among those aware, the odds of blacks being treated with warfarin were only one fourth as great as whites (OR=0.28; 0.13 to 0.60). Conclusion— Blacks were less likely than whites to be aware of having AF or to be treated with warfarin. Potential reasons for the racial disparity in warfarin treatment warrant further investigation.

Background and Purpose— Predictive models of outcome after ischemic stroke have incorporated acute diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) information with mixed results. We hypothesized that serial measurements of DWI infarct volume would be predictive of functional outcome after ischemic stroke. Methods— The prospective Acute Stroke Accurate Prediction (ASAP) Study included a prespecified serial imaging subgroup who underwent DWI studies at baseline (<24 hours after symptom onset) and Day 5 (±2 days). DWI infarct volumes were calculated using the Analyze software (Rochester, Minn). Clinical outcomes were assessed at 3 months. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between change in DWI lesion volume and excellent neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0, 1, and Barthel Index ≥95). Results— In total, 169 cases from the ASAP study had serial DWI scans with a measurable lesion at baseline, follow-up, or both. The median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 6 (interquartile range, 3 to 13). For each 10 cm 3 of growth in DWI infarct volume, the OR for achieving an excellent outcome by modified Rankin Scale was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.71) and for the Barthel Index was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.79). Adjusting for clinically important covariates, the OR for an excellent modified Rankin Scale outcome was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.88) and excellent Barthel Index outcome was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.56 to 1.01). Conclusions— Based on these data, the likelihood of achieving an excellent neurological outcome diminishes substantially with growth in DWI infarct volume in the first 5 days after ischemic stroke of mild to moderate severity.

Background and Purpose— A simple, easily measured surrogate outcome measure for use in early treatment trials for acute ischemic stroke therapies would be highly valued. We hypothesized that day-5 NIH stroke scale score (NIHSS) and day-5 diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) volume would predict clinical outcome better than either alone and could be considered as a possible surrogate outcome in early phase acute stroke trials. Methods— The prospective Acute Stroke Accurate Prediction (ASAP) trial included a prespecified subgroup evaluated for early outcome. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the prediction of modified Rankin (mRankin) of 0 or 1. Results— A total of 204 subjects completed the substudy, and 116 (57%) had excellent outcome at 3 months. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for day-5 NIHSS predicting 3-month excellent outcome was 0.84; for DWI volume predicting outcome was 0.76, and for the multivariable model combining both was 0.84. Conclusions— The results of the early outcome substudy of the ASAP trial suggest that early stroke severity and infarct volume measures are predictive of 3-month excellent outcome. In our data set the DWI volume does not add clinically relevant information in predicting 3-month outcome. Validation of these results is required.